User talk:Volunteer Marek: Difference between revisions

Thank you for your note. It's an interesting article. Frankly, I'm surprised Wikipedia didn't have an article about the ghetto previously. Thanks for taking care of that. :-) — [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] (talk · contribs) 03:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AE

Hi, Skäpperöd just started another WP:AE against me and he also mentioned you and Jacurek.. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. Loosmark (talk) 17:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas on cost of recession

Nice article. I've added a little bit on the equity premium, will expand if I get time.JQ (talk) 21:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfCU for Viriditas

Although you are not a party, I am letting you know that I cited an attack upon you and a comment of yours to Viriditas -- as one of many comments by other editors to Viriditas re his/her posting behavior -- in the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Viriditas, which covers Viriditas' WP:Wikihounding campaign. Mosedschurte (talk) 05:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lublin Ghetto

On July 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lublin Ghetto, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Giants27 (

c|s) 08:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal

Thanks for your note. I don't have any issue with you mentioning me. Good luck with your appeal. It does seem unfair that you would be sanctioned before you were given warning. — [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] (talk · contribs) 04:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

Notice of editing restrictions

File:Yellow warning.png

Notice: Under the terms of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren, "any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict (defined as articles which relate to Eastern Europe, broadly interpreted) if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.

Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision by an uninvolved administrator; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines."

Note: This notice is not effective unless given by an administrator and logged here.

-- Thatcher 20:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Expulsion of Germans / Warsaw

An RfC has opened about this issue at Talk:Expulsion of Germans after World War II#RfC: Nazi atrocities in Warsaw. Skäpperöd (talk) 05:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Herzog speech

Here is the text-[4]--Woogie10w (talk) 14:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I read the speech, there is nothing in the text concerning the Expulsion of the Germans after WW2. --Woogie10w (talk) 15:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm struggling through it in German and I'm not seeing it. Perhaps the source I gave was referring to a different speech of Herzog's (he gave a few related ones)?radek (talk) 15:15, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He would never ever mention the expulsions in Warsaw, that would only anger the Poles. Think, man. Try harder, I bet there is a reliable scholarly Polish source on public opinion in 1945-46, a sociological study that mentions the fact that Germans were persona non grata because of the war. I don't read Polish, I am busy learning Korean--Woogie10w (talk) 17:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're right that in that particular speech he probably wouldn't. But the source does note the two together. I'll look through the Polish sourcesradek (talk) 17:33, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Kołobrzeg

I commented there and urge you to reconsider. Skäpperöd (talk) 16:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented back and I don't see where you get the idea that a town's website cannot be used. It's certainly not on RSN as you suggest.radek (talk) 16:55, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AE

Since you stick to your accusations of disruption and forum shopping, I filed WP:AE#Radeksz. Skäpperöd (talk) 12:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 :I've commented back and I don't see where you get the idea that a town's website cannot be used. It's certainly not on RSN as you suggest.[[User:Radeksz|radek]] ([[User talk:Radeksz#top|talk]]) 16:55, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
+== AE ==
+Since you stick to your accusations of disruption and forum shopping, I filed [[WP:AE#Radeksz]]. [[User:Skäpperöd|Skäpperöd]] ([[User talk:Skäpperöd|talk]]) 12:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC)