User talk:Rjwilmsi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fairness And Accuracy For All (talk | contribs) at 19:28, 28 March 2007 (Thanks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

D. gray-man

The d. gray-man page is becoming more active. I saw your name in the history page, and I wondered if you would like to contribute to it more often. Contact me through my talk page - User: Countmall

Hi, Rjwilmsi!

Thanks for your intervention on Attraction to disability.

Now...

To be disinterested is to be altruistic (to lack a material incentive to do something; to do something pro bono). Motherly help is disinterested, because moms don't send their children bills for the care they lavished on them.

To be uninterested is not to be motivated at all. One may be uninterested in going to see Evita or A Holiday on Ice because one finds them deathly boring.

A nice distinction to remember :)

Hey

Thanks for Your "Typo fixing". :) NAHID 19:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My use of scripts to correct spelling and formatting

I currently use WP:AWB, the spelling correction script of User:Wmahan/Spelling, and the live spelling script of User:Lupin/Anti-vandal tool in an attempt to correct spelling mistakes or typos and to correct formatting to meet wikipedia standards defined in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. I make mistakes now and again, so if I do make a mistake, please report it here and I'll repair it and try to update my scripts / usage procedures so I don't make the mistake again. I have posted my AWB script at User:Rjwilmsi/AWB. Rjwilmsi 08:56, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

I was merrily using your misspelling script to edit articles yesterday, but now get a “database empty” error — have I already broken it? Rjwilmsi 12:21, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't break it; I just didn't get around to updating the database. It should work again. Thanks for letting me know. -- Wmahan . 03:45, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling Correction For Jean Harris: I noticed that you changed "pled" to "plead" in a spelling correction for the Jean Harris article. For your information, "pled" was correct in the first place. "pleaded" is also correct, but "plead" is incorrect in the sentence. I'll give you a chance to correct it again. Done. You're right. For some reason 'pled' doesn't appear in the Aspell en_US or en_GB dictionaries, but I've added it to my own lists. Rjwilmsi 08:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just updated my misspelling database with most of the new entries submitted by you and others. I hope your exam goes (went?) well. Wmahan. 16:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

125mm->125&#160mm

I'm not sure why you changed this on the article on Traube's space, please explain on my talk page. --Steven Fruitsmaak 18:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Fixed Rjwilmsi 22:30, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

earnt

"Earnt" is the simple past of "earn" — a perfectly legitimate form, used widely in the U.K. I've had this discussion before, and it's getting tiring. If Wiktionary doesn't think it's a word, so much the worse for Wiktionary. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:55, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied Rjwilmsi 22:30, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the Wiktionary entry, and given a citation on the Talk page (from Fowler's). It's billed there as non-standard, but increasingly common in print (and Googling reveals the extent of its usage). I've seen (and used) it in modern academic English in reputable publications. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:27, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on Kelly Van Der Veer

Your edit on this article is not correct. The translation from dutch to English of "Kelly Van Der Veer" is "Kelly of of the feather" on Babelfish you can see it for a proof using [|Babelfish]. Therefore I am reverting your edit. Unitedroad 05:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replied Rjwilmsi 12:18, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Chihara

Thanks for cleaning up the multiple typos in that little article, Rjwilmsi. Jeez! I must have been hitting the bottle pretty hard that night! -- Rizzleboffin 22:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Features of the Marvel Universe

As you can see here[1], you corrected the spelling of a name. It was correct in the first place. If this was done by a bot, could you tweak it to recognize Mar-Vell as a proper name? CovenantD 14:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PAGE INTERUPTIONS / VANDALISM

205.188.117.6 "BEATLEWILL" This user has repetedly used a main article page to use it for a forum to rant his "opinions" (not facts) - it has already been reverted to the talk or discussion page where is belongs by a wise monitor/editor. But he refuses to take heed and puts up the same "disputes" and "opinion pieces" on a main subject page. THis is esp. true for the article on ART LORIA where the article shows his contributions to the music industry and is sourced, referenced and cited and properly formated.

Then 205.188.117.6 "BEATLEWILL" will come along and deface the article and rant about his opinions on his particular taste in music. Seems that because Mr. Loria was a "DOO WOP" performer, this vandal who has a more un-flattering for that genre of music, rather would share his opionin of the Beatles instead. BEATLEWILL even calims to be a spokesperson foe the Beatles and offers statements on what Yoko Ono or Psul McCartney would have to say. This is a disgrace! But totally acceptable if placed in the right forum. He has been corrected officially once, warned several times, but his banter continues.

That is is right and opinion of course - we just ask that he not be allowed to deface and disgrace an article main page in doing so. It takes away from the integrity of the music, theartist and WIKIPEDIA. Please follow the history of this user and look into this matter / complaint I have discussd. I'm doing research for a book and this is getting quite annoying. I'm not interested in his opinions of the Beatles, I'm interested in certain Doo Wop artists - it is greatly appriciated.

Please avoid sweeping non-changes.

Hi Rjwilmsi,

If you could avoid making sweeping non-changes like this one, I'd appreciate it; they don't serve any purpose, but make the diffs useless. (Also, they can be taken as rude or imperious, as they impose one editor's preference without any actual benefit, much like changing an article from U.K. spelling to U.S. spelling. I'm sure that wasn't your intent, though.) It's not a huge deal, it would just make me happier. :-)

Thanks in advance! Ruakh 23:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you left a comment at my talk-page; I've replied to it there. Thanks for getting back to me. :-) Ruakh 11:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

list of film formats changes

Thanks for catching the Pharaoh's Woman typo! I'm not entirely sure I understand your edits to the link names, though. 8mm vs 8 mm, perhaps, but why 8 mm instead of 8 mm? Thanks, Girolamo Savonarola 17:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Correct wikipedia formatting has a non-breaking space for units such as millimetres, so I'm correcting them as part of my misspelling correction. In this case it's probably unnecessary to correct them, but they don't break the links, so I haven't bothered to cancel those changes. Rjwilmsi 18:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful ':)

Just a note, but although some or most of the spelling of an article meets normal conditions, sometimes misspellings must remain in order to be factually correct. Just letting you know. By the way, thanks for taking care of it. :) Ste4k 20:22, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you're referring to my edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Authorship_of_A_Course_in_Miracles&curid=3663921&diff=60878527&oldid=60878370 ? In which case I think my edit was correct. However, I do understand the need to quote sources directly and carry over spelling mistakes with a [sic] etc. and I'm trying to write my script / perform edits in such a way that these quotes aren't 'corrected'. If I do make mistakes let me know and I will rectify them. Rjwilmsi 20:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
yes, however, I am surprised that you can quote from PDF files. Great Job!! :) Ste4k 20:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

refered misspellings

sure I can get that. i'll make it my next run. 'refered' is one of the top most common ones, along with 'prefered', 'occured' and 'offical'. those double r's get people. i haven't run it for refered though in about a month so it must be piling up! JoeBot 14:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'succeded' and 'precceded' shall be next! :) JoeBot 17:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moose (dog actor)

Just to let you know I've reverted back your correction of spelling as the dog is staring at Frasier not starring with. (Pally01 21:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Regarding the Pascual Jordan article...

Thanks for the back-up on spelling. If it isn't obvious, it's not my strongest suit. ;-) Abt 12 08:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saiful azam

The above article listed his name in the text as Saif-ul Azam and when you spelled checked you changed it to Saif-upload Azam. I've changed it back and no harm done, but it might be worth looking at the automated bot to ensure this doesn't happen indiscriminately. Good work. --Richhoncho 08:53, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of sock puppetry on the Center for Science in the Public Interest page

Allegations of sock puppetry have been made against some of the accounts that have edited the Center for Science in the Public Interest page. I have instigated the wiki process for handling such allegations. See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/David Justin. As someone who has contributed to the CSPI page, please add your views to the Comments section. You have up to 10 days to make comments on the allegation. Nunquam Dormio 18:47, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Correction of "Misspellings" that shouldn't remain

Rjwilmsi,

I think the correction of numerous misspellings is honorable. I found a few instances where misspellings are being improperly applied. The ones I'm particularly referring to are corrections to quotations of people who lived long enough ago to use non-contemporary spellings of English words that are also not incorrect either.

For example, the title "Compleat Works of Shakespeare" should be left alone.

The quote in Early life of Joseph Smith, Jr. referring to the "fulness of the Gospel" should probably be left that way.

Does each edit go through any sort of manual oversight, or is it a mass search-and-replace? When corrected to a modernly spelling recognized as correct, these sorts of edits are difficult to detect, as when I see the "Complete" works of Shakespeare, I (and probably most people) don't see anything inherently wrong unless I am overly familiar enough to know there's a misspelling that should persist.

I am curious about your thoughts regarding ways to leave these sorts of archaic spellings included, noting that I tend to believe that the value in correcting zillions of spelling errors to the encyclopedia is probably far greater than the hassle of a few people having to revert the odd change that shouldn't have been changed. Reswobslc 16:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'comercial' etc.

Done! There is a bank and a couple other industries in Mexico/South America it appears that use the spanish spelled 'Comericial'; thus there may be hits via a Google inquery. Cheers! JoeBot 18:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC) [reply]

wikEd

The wikEdlogo
The wikEdlogo

Hi, I have seen that you are using the Cacycle editor extension. This program is no longer actively maintained in favor of its much more powerful successor wikEd.

wikEd has all the functionality of the old editor plus: • syntax highlighting • nifty image buttons • more fixing buttons • paste formatted text from Word or web pages • convert the formatted text into wikicode • adjust the font size • and much, much more.

Switching to wikEd is easy, check the detailed installation description on its project homepage. Often it is as simple as changing every occurrence of editor.js into wikEd.js on your User:YourUsername/monobook.js page.

Cacycle 22:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling Script

Hi, thanks for correcting spelling. But I think in your script is a bug. It correctly replaces spelling in Jiří Grossmann Rjwilmsi (Talk | contribs) m (Correcting spelling: beleive->believe) but it left additional unwanted character in word: establishedç -> established. Tulkolahten 21:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UGM-27 Polaris

Hi, thanks for correcting my repeated and inexcusable mis-spellings of equivalent etc, but you do need to consider the context when making other spelling changes. Your changes of 'allotted' to 'alloted' and 'targetting' to 'targeting' are misjudged in the context they appear in. That section on the British Polaris programme (get it ... with mme...) reads badly when changed because it was written from a British perspective about a British strategy. As I (perhaps imperfectly) understand Wiki policy on these matters, spelling in either American English or English English (the Scots, Welsh and Irish have their own languages, LOL) is perfectly acceptable, and where there is a spelling conflict the context should indicate which is most suitable. Its not a big deal; not worth dying in a ditch for, but a reversion would be appreciated. Brian.Burnell 12:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bank of Korea

Just want to let you know that I reverted the typo correction in Bank of Korea from "preceded" back to "preceeded". The typo is part of the script of Template:Infobox central bank. Like I said, it's just to let know this situation happend. And fixing the template means fixing every page that use that template (even though it's a lesser used line).
Luccas 01:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon World

Please see Talk:Dragon World dispute for your vote on whether we should keep the Human (Dragon World) article or have it merged into Dragon World. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 16:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Satoko Urata

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Thanks! --Vox Causa 22:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tritone

So, um...do you realize that you changed one misspelling to a different misspelling in the Tritone article?--Roivas 02:54, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry, I don't know much about these fancy editing programs. Well, I guess it's best to bring it to the user's attention so they know something's up.--Roivas 20:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

Hi Rjwilmsi, I am Smcafirst, the creator of WP:GHR. Thank you so much for cleaning up my articles under the WikiProject WP:GHR. For example, you fixed typos on York Regional Road 1 and Henderson Avenue. Your effort is much appreciated.

Due to your excellent job of cleaning up of our WP:GHR, we want to invite you to be our Clean-up Counsellor, on behalf of my group members. Please consider joining our Wikiproject.

See Also

Thank you once again!

P.S. Do you mind if I add you as a Wikifriend? See User:Smcafirst/Best Friends on Wikipedia for more!

-- Smcafirst is Glad to serve you, click here • Sign here • Chit-Chat with me • What I give at 15:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your type correction. That article was one of the poorest episodes I have started I will write more detail later. Feel free to read through the other episodes I have started in the right hand navigation box and the main article I have written from a stub itself. cheers Ernst Stavro Blofeld 19:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling corrections in Nicolas Bouvier article, thanks!

Thanks for fixing my spelling mistakes in the Nicolas Bouvier English article. It's really quite embarrassing how badly French messes up my English. Really appreciate the help and this evidence of the article being read!

Cheers!

Tobateksingh 21:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling of "Staf"

Hello,

Thank you for catching the typos in the article on the Royal Carillon School "Jef Denyn". I have reverted one of your revisions. "Staf Nees" is the proper spelling of the name of the former director of the school. Staf is a Flemish name, short for Gustaf, although in my research I have never come across documents of his in which he was designated as Gustaf.

Carillonista 01:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Apprentice

Hello, Rjwilmsi and thank you for your contributions on articles related to The Apprentice UK. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject The Apprentice UK, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Apprentice UK and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! Dalejenkins 21:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

Hi! Your edit Correcting spelling: worshipped->worshiped is incorrect. The article uses British English spellings, and worshipped is the correct spelling. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 11:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that one out. I've removed the incorrect entry from Wikipedia:Lists of common misspellings/For machines.

Hello

Thanks for visiting a Pashtun tribe Swati article. I was trying to improve that but certainly, I would need some minor help from friends around also. Thanks. 202.154.255.4 09:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meagan Good's character's name in You Got Served

actually is spelled 'Beautifull'. I've fixed it.

Replied & added exception Rjwilmsi 17:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent Feedback Help!

I'm looking for someone to give feedback to my page Cellular Manufacturing

Please help!

Meganlaw15 06:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling "mw"

Your edit of Preston#Local Radio Stations changed "mw" to "mW". In fact it should be "MW" = "medium wave" (not milliwatts).--Dr Greg 11:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YES!

Thank you for your spelling AWB work. Please let me give you a random High five! —ScouterSig 18:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling note

Hello. Regarding your user page request to report mistakes, "ballon" was spelt correctly in the Roberto Baggio article. Regards. --Muchness

Replied & fixed. Rjwilmsi 17:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling "corrections" in Canonical hours

"Typica" is spelled correctly. It's the name of a kind of church service in Eastern Orthodoxy. Last time someone did this I even inserted a comment informing prospective spellcheckers that this word was not misspelled. TCC (talk) (contribs) 22:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling kidnaped

I don't believe kidnaped is a misspelling. In any case, your "correction" defeats the purpose of the sentence. Your bot also failed to mention in its edit summary the huge number of citation-punctuation changes it made. jnestorius(talk) 23:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied & fixed Rjwilmsi 17:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please be a bit more careful when using AWB

When you go through fixing spelling mistakes using AWB, can you please be more careful to check whether the word used is grammatically sound in the sentence? Here it is clearly obvious that the word used should be "broadcast" not "broadcasted". Thanks! -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 07:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied - 'broadcasted' is an acceptable variant in this case, though accept need to fix grammar. Rjwilmsi 17:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your cleanup on the Altavista petroglyphs article. I was unsure about the capitalization. Is the word European always capiltalized - even in cases like "The European stance on the issue..." ? - FaAfA Aloha 19:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rjwilmsi&oldid=118587380"