User talk:Sarahehill: Difference between revisions
Yngvadottir (talk | contribs) Answering help request; moving section to bottom, creating section header above block notice for clarity |
→Blocked: no worries, this is a softblock because of the orgname, it will get sorted out shortly. sorry about the byzantine bureaucracy |
||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
:As to the block on your account, I am not sure what you mean about the new account name; have you already registered a new one? In any event, if you wish to have this one unblocked, follow the instructions in the template; but you must understand that if you are unblocked, just as any article on the company must not be purely promotional, you must not use the account simply to promote the company. [[User:Yngvadottir|Yngvadottir]] ([[User talk:Yngvadottir|talk]]) 01:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
:As to the block on your account, I am not sure what you mean about the new account name; have you already registered a new one? In any event, if you wish to have this one unblocked, follow the instructions in the template; but you must understand that if you are unblocked, just as any article on the company must not be purely promotional, you must not use the account simply to promote the company. [[User:Yngvadottir|Yngvadottir]] ([[User talk:Yngvadottir|talk]]) 01:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
:: Here it is — [[User_talk:Sarahehill]]. I've left a nice note over there. [[Special:Contributions/74.192.84.101|74.192.84.101]] ([[User talk:74.192.84.101|talk]]) 01:19, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:19, 19 March 2014
Welcome!
|
Hi Smpcorp: Thanks for the thank you :-) I'd like to thank you also for registering an account and seeking to help improve Wikipedia. However, to justify an article on Standard Motor Products, Inc., there needs to be evidence that the company is frequently written about in reliable independent sources. Here's a summary of the requirements; Here are specific guidelines for companies. All I see so far in your draft is that linked from the New York Times summary, there is one news article. You need a couple more of those to demonstrate notability in the sense in which we use it.
Also, thank you for being open about your conflict of interest on your user page. I appreciate that, and that you are drafting the article in user space. However, your user name, being that of the company, violates our username policy: see this section. You will need to change it: Wikipedia:Changing username has the directions. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:38, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Blocked
If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice.
You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice. Thank you.
Template:Z15--Orange Mike | Talk 23:56, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
My account and the information has been blocked. I understand this is because the username was too close to the organization being written about. I have changed the username and made one under sarahehill. However all the information has disappeared under smpcorp. Yngvadottir also suggested the organization needs more references to legitimate sources, because we "only had one reference" from The New York Times. I am not sure where this knowledge came from or what draft he was looking at, but we had about a dozen more listed. I referenced the NYSE, and multiple New York Times articles. I referenced The New York Post, USA Today and more. In fact, we have well over a dozen or more legitimate sources. We have entire books written by outside sources about the company's history and economic model. I was not finished writing and the article, and the article was still in draft stage before seeking approval when we were blocked. We are a 96 year old company publicly traded on the NYSE. Google the name Standard Motor Products, Inc. and you will find us. How can I proceed? I am creating a very unbiased article using only information from outside sources. We sought a consultant earlier in the year who gave us tips and encouraged us that we would be able to create a page based on how many sources we have. They even said they were confidant we would be able to be on Wikipedia with their "editors'" help or we could try it ourselves and not have to pay them. We are wanting to resolve our non representation on Wikipedia internally using your guide. We are even on Wiki Invest already. Please help.
- Smpcorp: I have asked the fellow administrator who deleted the draft to undelete it; I and another editor were able to find further references and I've offered to do some rewriting so that it does not appear promotional in tone. However, the reason Wikipedia has rules against conflict of interest editing is that encyclopedic writing has to be neutral, and therefore is quite different from other corporate writing, and can be extremely hard to do when one cares deeply about the topic. Wiki Invest, for example, has very different requirements.
- As to the block on your account, I am not sure what you mean about the new account name; have you already registered a new one? In any event, if you wish to have this one unblocked, follow the instructions in the template; but you must understand that if you are unblocked, just as any article on the company must not be purely promotional, you must not use the account simply to promote the company. Yngvadottir (talk) 01:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- Here it is — User_talk:Sarahehill. I've left a nice note over there. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 01:19, 19 March 2014 (UTC)