User talk:Semitransgenic

Statement at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms

Hi Semitransgenic. You recently added a statement at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms. The case has been opened and new statements are no longer allowed. Evidence is welcome at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms/Evidence until 12 October 2015. Thanks, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 20:39, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Re: Removal of sourced content from Electronic dance music

Since there isn't an article on EDM festivals as a concept in general, I think the removal of that information was simply arbitrary because you didn't like the EDM page to be used as an "anti-drug platform". These issues emphasize a major contrast between these commercially-sanctioned events and the unsanctioned rave culture of the past. ViperSnake151  Talk  20:25, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Reverting edits

Please refrain from reverting my edits. The AFDs are justified, and if you are positive of the articles' notability, then you have nothing to worry about. I, on the other hand, have deemed those articles as dubious in the own right, and symptomatic of a much larger music genre issue at Wikipedia and think it is something the community should discuss.--Coin945 (talk) 13:56, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

I have since withdrawn all of my AFDs. Thanks.--Coin945 (talk) 14:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Your recent editing history at Shah Rukh Khan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Human3015^TALK  22:01, 15 November 2015 \ (UTC)

shit!!! o nooooooo, the white hand of DOOOOMMMMMM!!!!! AHHHHHHHHH....... Semitransgenic _talk. 22:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Human3015^TALK  22:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

oh shit, nooooo, is someone going to spank me now? Semitransgenic _talk. 22:33, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

You should cool down first. You are suppose to be polite while editing Wikipedia. You are experienced enough editor, you should set an example for other new editors by your behavior. Editors like you usually lose their reputation or community trust and their edits are not taken as seriously. Regards. --Human3015^TALK  23:35, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

dude, I'm like totally cool, but thank you for your words of support, peace out, word. Semitransgenic _talk. 23:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Novembre 2015

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms/Proposed decision. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. NativeForeigner ^Talk 01:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms/Proposed decision. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. You're continuing to push the envelope. While I understand you have a problem with Jytdog, your edits here are doing nothing to help the situation, they merely inflame it. NativeForeigner ^Talk 01:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for personal attacks and incivility. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Roger Davies ^talk 01:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Fuck you Roger

Swivel. Semitransgenic _talk. 01:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Oh please, please, please, can I be unblocked sir?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Semitransgenic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

the sensation of your cock in my ass is unpleasant Semitransgenic _talk. 8:37 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Declined and block extended to 1 week. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sympathy card

I sympathize with your feelings and recent actions. I dealt with the same anger, but I decided to channel it into more constructive criticism that is still within the paradigm of community norms. I hope I can encourage you to join me when your block expires. Viriditas (talk) 01:53, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

History of Tibet (1950–present) Semitransgenic _talk. 02:10, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Re. your comment the other night: Bluntly said but straight on. Beautiful, just beautiful.--TMCk (talk) 13:29, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:47, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! BollyJeff | talk 04:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Since you appear to be blocked, I suggest you logon and respond there as an IP, while identifying yourself as Semitransgenic. BollyJeff | talk 21:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

No, please don't. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

@Bollyjeff: I think that will be a block evasion, maybe he need permission of ArbCom for that. There is no hurry for dispute resolution. I have been involved in many DRN cases, such disputes don't resolve quickly, it can go on and on. One of dispute in which I was involved lasted for 3 months, so there is no hurry, he can comment after 4-5 days once his block ends. Till then we have restored pre-dispute FA version. If DRN fails to resolve dispute then matter goes to WP:Mediation committee for mediation. There is long way to go. --Human3015^TALK  21:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Okay then, thank you BollyJeff | talk 02:34, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

If you are comfortable doing so, feel free to close the DRN discussion as resolved. Thanks! -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 17:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)