User talk:Ulric1313: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
User F203 (talk | contribs)
Sea888 (talk | contribs)
Line 163: Line 163:


Thanks for watching my talk. Much obliged! [[User:Mlaffs|Mlaffs]] ([[User talk:Mlaffs|talk]]) 00:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for watching my talk. Much obliged! [[User:Mlaffs|Mlaffs]] ([[User talk:Mlaffs|talk]]) 00:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

== Strikeforce ==

Hey, could you take a look at [[Talk:Strikeforce]] and maybe chip in so we get closer to a consensus for the latest issue? There have been quite a few issues about ignoring sources from mma websites and restructuring the page. Thanks, [[User:Sea888|Sea888]] ([[User talk:Sea888|talk]]) 00:33, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:33, 22 August 2009

Hey!

Thanks for reverting that vandalism! :) Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 07:52, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grass Fight

There is still some vandalism that needs sorting on this article. I'm not familiar with the article's subject though. Mjroots (talk) 18:04, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback enabled on your account

Hello Ulric1313,

I have noticed that you revert quite a bit of vandalism. Since you have demonstrated that you have a good grasp of what constitutes vandalism, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! J.delanoygabsadds 05:39, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should have had it long ago. I saw you revert vandalism on 3 or 4 pages on my watchlist, looked at your contribs, and was like "Whoa". Have fun, and keep up the good work! J.delanoygabsadds 05:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Patar knight

Why did my edit blank the page? --70.48.56.21 (talk) 19:08, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THANKs for the explanationn. --70.48.56.21 (talk) 19:18, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your assistance in keeping USS New Jersey (BB-62) vandal free while the article was up on the mainpage I herby award you The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. Keep up the good work! TomStar81 (Talk) 00:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on my user page

That was quick! Thanks. William Avery (talk) 07:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User Page

You're welcome :) We all get it at some point. Welcome to the club! Pinkadelica Say it... 07:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


that person

on the Kama Sutra should we ban him or give him 2 more chances? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yowiki (talkcontribs) 05:00, 18 October 2008 (UTC) Thnx Ulric i gave him 2, but he did it 4 times. SO what? u know who im talking about right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yowiki (talkcontribs) 05:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But he keeps doing attacks on my page this shit is getting annoying.--Yowiki (talk) 05:32, 18 October 2008 (UTC) Alright Hi5.--Yowiki (talk) 05:38, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage vandalism revert

Thanks for your efforts. Much appreciated. —Vanderdeckenξφ 14:38, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page it was greatly appreciated. -Vcelloho (talk) 03:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Credit default swap

  • Hi there, please refrain from deleting entire sections of this article without discussing your rationale on the talk page. Thanks! 78.146.25.119 (talk) 23:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Hi Ulric1313, Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page!   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 00:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers,   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 01:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Invitation

WikiProject Texas Tech University

As a current or past contributor to a related article or as someone who may otherwise be interested, I wanted to let you know about WikiProject Texas Tech University, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Texas Tech and the Texas Tech University System. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of tasks. Thanks! — Wordbuilder (talk) 21:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please check the comment on this page, Talk:British Columbia Coast. IMHO, a whole section should be re-written or put into wikiquotes. I noticed you had done some revisions and corrections on the article page. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 21:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Red Raiders Kicker Matt Williams

Hey, I couldn't find a thing on his date of birth. Maybe when he gets a little bigger somebody will publish it.--Almosthonest06 (talk) 06:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for the ruining of the articles —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.7.126.253 (talk) 05:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

For the quick revert on my userpage. Much appreciated! --Faradayplank (talk) 06:45, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, they truly do not know when to stop. Thanks again. --Faradayplank (talk) 07:01, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

mind explaining why?

If you think my edit did not improve the article, that's fine and I'm happy to discuss. Drive-by reversions without any explanation about the actual merits of the change just strikes me as quite rude and counterproductive. The guidelines WP:BOLD explicitly encourage bold improvement of an article, so simply saying the changes are too big, without actual comment on the substance of the change doesn't fly. Thanks. As to my changes, they were actually not big, and I did explain them in the edit summaries they were (1) leave the definition at an actual quote rather than the quote plus a pov paraphrase (2) integrate a one-line section into the main text (3) add another example of a spin-off (4) remove one quite pov statement (at the end of palin) that was in no way necessary to the point. Which of those do you have a problem with? Thanks. 130.56.65.24 (talk) 04:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation, and the self-revert. Must have checked in during the wrong few second. Had been a bit put-off by the previous revert, so was not as courteous as I should have been. 130.56.65.24 (talk) 04:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My user page

Thanks a lot for reverting vandalism!! LeaveSleaves talk 07:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Oops

That's okay, we're all on the same team. And we all make mistakes, but you caught it quickly, which I applaud. Cheers. – Alex43223 T | C | E 08:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wow

I am impressed that you are still actively working on New Year Eve :D. I were gonna revert the vandalism from the French_Third_Republic article but you were faster than me. Thank you a lot for keeping wikipedia clean and free. And Happy New Year :). Mgz (talk) 08:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage vandalism

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage! :-) —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 09:15, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Me too, thanks! :D Matt (Talk) 01:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Me three! Vicenarian (talk) 23:22, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks!

I would just like to thank you for Reverting some vandalism from my userpage. Thank you very much! Renaissancee (talk) 00:13, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I noticed your work on disambiguating pages; if anything requires tireless devotion, that's it. Cheers. Bobak (talk) 20:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hello Ulric1313...., i've just accidentally visited the history of my user page, thanks for reverting that vendalism. nomi887 (talk) 10:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IP vandal on android page

We both seem to be watching the same page...that vandal has been reported to WP|AIV Frmatt (talk) 05:40, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And has now been blocked.Frmatt (talk) 05:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Janke

How did you get to the Scott Janke article? Just curious. Thank you for your edit to the article. User F203 (talk) 16:17, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You better read the Scott Janke article again because it looks like it will be deleted. I think it should be a redirect and very limited merge. User F203 (talk) 15:19, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Much obliged

Just a quick note to say thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. --Muboshgu (talk) 00:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie!

Thanks for watching my talk. Much obliged! Mlaffs (talk) 00:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strikeforce

Hey, could you take a look at Talk:Strikeforce and maybe chip in so we get closer to a consensus for the latest issue? There have been quite a few issues about ignoring sources from mma websites and restructuring the page. Thanks, Sea888 (talk) 00:33, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]