Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron – Rescue list

 Main page Rescue list Content menus Article Rescue guide Newsletter Members Awards Talk page 

ARS Code of Conduct Note that this wikiproject is only intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting votes or vote-stacking. Be sure to follow the guideline on canvassing. This means, in part, that you should use Template:Rescue list on the deletion discussion page when you list the discussion here. Focus on improving content. For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic notability by adding reliable-source references with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion. Show the light. If you comment in an AfD discussion, try to describe points in the nomination that have been corrected. Note any remaining deficiencies (e.g. lack of organization, structural problems, lack of balance, etc.). Base comments upon Wikipedia's deletion policy. If an article has been rewritten, you may place a comment in the AfD as a courtesy to assist the closing admin in determining which article version others were referring to.

For more information about article rescue, please refer to ARS Tips to help rescue articles and ARS Rescue guide

For additional article improvement listings, check out this project's archives and listings at WikiProject Cleanup

This is a list and discussion of Wikipedia content for rescue consideration. When posting here, please be sure to:

• First familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's guidelines for topic notability and identifying reliable sources.
• Include specific rationale why the article/content should be retained on Wikipedia, and any ideas to improve the content.
• Sign posts with four tildes ~~~~.
• Place the {{subst:rescue list|~~~~}} template in Articles for deletion discussions, to notify editors about the listing here. The tag can be placed below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

The following templates can be used for articles listed here:

• *{{Find sources|Article name}} - Adds source search options
• *{{lagafd|Article name}} - Adds relevant links
• *{{lagafd|Article name|Article name (Nth nomination)}} - Likewise but for page nominated N ≥ 4 times

— Please post new entries at the top of the list —

Nazi architecture

A few editors keep deleting the article and placing a copy vios complaint. This article was first started on 23 March 2004‎ with thousands of edits done by hundreds of editors. The article includes many valid citations from notable sources including books written by recognized experts on the topic. This article is not copy vios and I would appreciate some help saving it. It is a substantial article with valid and meaningful information. Thank you IQ125 (talk) 17:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

The topic of Nazi architecture is clearly important, and we need an article on the topic. The problem is that, 10 years ago, three editors added large amounts of text, most of which remains in the article, which was directly copied from several books or unattributed. Much of this text has footnotes, but there is (a) no indication that it is a direct quotation; (b) no indication of where the copying starts and stops; (c) far too extensive use of copying to count as "brief quotation". Unfortunately, this means that the article is heavily contaminated with copyrighted material, with no reasonable way to remove the violations. I have talked with IQ125 both on his Talk page and on the article Talk page, but not only has he persisted in removing the Copyvio template (added by an administrator), but he has restored text which I had confirmed to be a copyright violation. --Macrakis (talk) 02:55, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Kresten Bjerg

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

• I need sources to confirm his notability! --Magnus bjerg (talk) 07:41, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

• @Magnus bjerg - The only thing I found is an article that might be written by Kresten Bjerg: Måling af markedsføring fjerner fokus Dagbladet Børsen February 27, 2008. Likely, any sources will be non-English source. Try requesting sources at the Dansk language Wikipedia. -- Jreferee (talk) 03:13, 11 January 2016 (UTC)