Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of non-sovereign countries: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 11: Line 11:
*:*:It may be more appropriate to discuss a potential re-definitions of headings or a move to "Non-sovereign states" as discussed in: https://www.thoughtco.com/country-state-and-nation-1433559 for example, rather than just deleting the entire page. [[User:Titus Gold|Titus Gold]] ([[User talk:Titus Gold|talk]]) 11:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
*:*:It may be more appropriate to discuss a potential re-definitions of headings or a move to "Non-sovereign states" as discussed in: https://www.thoughtco.com/country-state-and-nation-1433559 for example, rather than just deleting the entire page. [[User:Titus Gold|Titus Gold]] ([[User talk:Titus Gold|talk]]) 11:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
*:*::Those are not definitions, those are names/labels. This page lacks any definitions. As for the link discussed (not that it appears to be that high quality a source), we already have articles for those topics at [[Country]], [[State (polity)]], and [[Nation]]. Any rename of this article would face the same issue of SYNTH, the issue is not the title per se. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 12:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
*:*::Those are not definitions, those are names/labels. This page lacks any definitions. As for the link discussed (not that it appears to be that high quality a source), we already have articles for those topics at [[Country]], [[State (polity)]], and [[Nation]]. Any rename of this article would face the same issue of SYNTH, the issue is not the title per se. [[User:Chipmunkdavis|CMD]] ([[User talk:Chipmunkdavis|talk]]) 12:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
:* All inhabited BOTs should be included. Why not? [[Special:Contributions/219.76.18.205|219.76.18.205]] ([[User talk:219.76.18.205|talk]]) 13:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
*'''Strong delete'''. Article is pure [[WP:OR]], and is impossible to recreate without OR. As CMD says, the phrases defining the list, {{tq|recognised as countries by their respective sovereign states}} and {{tq|non-sovereign "nations" that are recognised as such either by their respective sovereign state or internationally}} are essentially meaningless. There is no "country" or "nation" status that exists in any sense that can meaningfully be applied internationally, except that of a sovereign state. The statuses of the entities in the list are not at all the same, while entities that do have the same status are not treated as parallel. It's a bit like making a ''list of Indians'' that includes both [[Mahatma Gandhi]] and [[Pocahontas]], but excludes both [[Sacagawea]] and [[Srinivasa Ramanujan]] as insufficiently "Indian".
*'''Strong delete'''. Article is pure [[WP:OR]], and is impossible to recreate without OR. As CMD says, the phrases defining the list, {{tq|recognised as countries by their respective sovereign states}} and {{tq|non-sovereign "nations" that are recognised as such either by their respective sovereign state or internationally}} are essentially meaningless. There is no "country" or "nation" status that exists in any sense that can meaningfully be applied internationally, except that of a sovereign state. The statuses of the entities in the list are not at all the same, while entities that do have the same status are not treated as parallel. It's a bit like making a ''list of Indians'' that includes both [[Mahatma Gandhi]] and [[Pocahontas]], but excludes both [[Sacagawea]] and [[Srinivasa Ramanujan]] as insufficiently "Indian".


Line 16: Line 17:
::Given [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_non-sovereign_countries&diff=1111153904&oldid=1111146200 this edit], I feel I should mention for the benefit of the closer that, while I have been contributing to the wider topic editor for many years, I was not aware of this article before I was pinged to this discussion. I am not aware of having had any other previous contact with the nominator. '''''[[User:Kahastok|Kahastok]]'''''&nbsp;<small>''[[User Talk:Kahastok|talk]]''</small> 19:25, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
::Given [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_non-sovereign_countries&diff=1111153904&oldid=1111146200 this edit], I feel I should mention for the benefit of the closer that, while I have been contributing to the wider topic editor for many years, I was not aware of this article before I was pinged to this discussion. I am not aware of having had any other previous contact with the nominator. '''''[[User:Kahastok|Kahastok]]'''''&nbsp;<small>''[[User Talk:Kahastok|talk]]''</small> 19:25, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
:::Yes, I've pinged two random editors who I've seen from the page's history have made major contributions to this topic for many years. [[User:Privybst|Privybst]] ([[User talk:Privybst|talk]]) 19:36, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
:::Yes, I've pinged two random editors who I've seen from the page's history have made major contributions to this topic for many years. [[User:Privybst|Privybst]] ([[User talk:Privybst|talk]]) 19:36, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
:: Are you talking about the German language or the English language? Is there any evidence that German or Austrian states are called "countries" or "federal countries" in the English language? If we are to talk about other languages, what about [[Shikoku]] or any of the geographical regions in Japan which were ''ryōseikoku''/​''ritsuryōkoku''? Why don't we focus ''only'' on the English language and related concepts in other languages such as the case of the ''pays d'outre-mer'' of French Polynesia? [[Special:Contributions/219.76.18.205|219.76.18.205]] ([[User talk:219.76.18.205|talk]]) 13:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' -- The concept is ill-defined. England is part of the United Kingdom (and included), but why are Texas and California, which were independent polities incorporated into the United States not included? [[User:Peterkingiron|Peterkingiron]] ([[User talk:Peterkingiron|talk]]) 19:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' -- The concept is ill-defined. England is part of the United Kingdom (and included), but why are Texas and California, which were independent polities incorporated into the United States not included? [[User:Peterkingiron|Peterkingiron]] ([[User talk:Peterkingiron|talk]]) 19:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
** Any evidence that California or Texas or Florida or Massachusetts are called or described as countries? [[Special:Contributions/124.217.188.170|124.217.188.170]] ([[User talk:124.217.188.170|talk]]) 12:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
** Any evidence that California or Texas or Florida or Massachusetts are called or described as countries? [[Special:Contributions/124.217.188.170|124.217.188.170]] ([[User talk:124.217.188.170|talk]]) 12:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Line 21: Line 23:
** '''Strong delete''' per nom and discussion. [[User:TNstingray|TNstingray]] ([[User talk:TNstingray|talk]]) 16:43, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
** '''Strong delete''' per nom and discussion. [[User:TNstingray|TNstingray]] ([[User talk:TNstingray|talk]]) 16:43, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
*'''Commemt''': Why are there countries which are "non-sovereign"? [[Special:Contributions/124.217.188.170|124.217.188.170]] ([[User talk:124.217.188.170|talk]]) 12:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
*'''Commemt''': Why are there countries which are "non-sovereign"? [[Special:Contributions/124.217.188.170|124.217.188.170]] ([[User talk:124.217.188.170|talk]]) 12:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

* Strong '''keep'''. An alternative option would be '''merge ''and'' redirect''' to the list of dependent territories and keep all edit history. [[Special:Contributions/219.76.18.205|219.76.18.205]] ([[User talk:219.76.18.205|talk]]) 13:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:10, 21 September 2022

List of non-sovereign countries

List of non-sovereign countries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no definition of a 'non-sovereign country'. Therefore such a list cannot exist, it is WP:OR. If there is a source that 'non-sovereign country' means dependent territory then I could redirect there. Privybst (talk) 07:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Lists. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:16, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Shortly after this list's creation, issues with it were raised on Talk:List of non-sovereign countries. They remain unresolved. Put simply, this list is a WP:SYNTH compilation of vastly different entities based on finding particular semantics in a source. (Two different semantics since "nations" were added to the list and are apparently different.) A month on from creation, not a single secondary source has been found for the topic. The phrase "recognised as countries" shows one of the key issues with this list, as there is no "country" status that can be recognised. The list misleading presents this term as a specific category of thing, when it's simply a term applied to some entities sometimes, and an arbitrary one at that. There is very little linking Indian tribes with Scotland. There is no reason with some British Overseas Territories are here and others aren't. That there is a Varied terminology subsection is odd, as that would apply to every entity on this list. CMD (talk) 11:18, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep (or move/re-defined) . It's important to be clear about the two headings currently used in the article, "non-sovereign country" and "non-sovereign nations". Scotland for example is a "country' according to ISO and the tribal nations of the USA are referred to as "nations", both clear definitions.
      It may be more appropriate to discuss a potential re-definitions of headings or a move to "Non-sovereign states" as discussed in: https://www.thoughtco.com/country-state-and-nation-1433559 for example, rather than just deleting the entire page. Titus Gold (talk) 11:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      Those are not definitions, those are names/labels. This page lacks any definitions. As for the link discussed (not that it appears to be that high quality a source), we already have articles for those topics at Country, State (polity), and Nation. Any rename of this article would face the same issue of SYNTH, the issue is not the title per se. CMD (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete. Article is pure WP:OR, and is impossible to recreate without OR. As CMD says, the phrases defining the list, recognised as countries by their respective sovereign states and non-sovereign "nations" that are recognised as such either by their respective sovereign state or internationally are essentially meaningless. There is no "country" or "nation" status that exists in any sense that can meaningfully be applied internationally, except that of a sovereign state. The statuses of the entities in the list are not at all the same, while entities that do have the same status are not treated as parallel. It's a bit like making a list of Indians that includes both Mahatma Gandhi and Pocahontas, but excludes both Sacagawea and Srinivasa Ramanujan as insufficiently "Indian".
It is worth considering that there are many other entities called "countries", but they are generally different things in different places. For example, all States of Germany and all States of Austria are formally referred to in German as "countries" or "federal countries". For example, France has a concept of a "country" that is a small cultural region. All of these statuses are different. Essentially the only point of commonality between these entities is that some Wikipedian has found some document that happened to describe them with the word "country". Kahastok talk 13:55, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Given this edit, I feel I should mention for the benefit of the closer that, while I have been contributing to the wider topic editor for many years, I was not aware of this article before I was pinged to this discussion. I am not aware of having had any other previous contact with the nominator. Kahastok talk 19:25, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I've pinged two random editors who I've seen from the page's history have made major contributions to this topic for many years. Privybst (talk) 19:36, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Are you talking about the German language or the English language? Is there any evidence that German or Austrian states are called "countries" or "federal countries" in the English language? If we are to talk about other languages, what about Shikoku or any of the geographical regions in Japan which were ryōseikoku/​ritsuryōkoku? Why don't we focus only on the English language and related concepts in other languages such as the case of the pays d'outre-mer of French Polynesia? 219.76.18.205 (talk) 13:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep. An alternative option would be merge and redirect to the list of dependent territories and keep all edit history. 219.76.18.205 (talk) 13:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]