Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 December 19: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Energy Institute: note |
Close this discussion and start one at AfD |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Overturn''' the [[WP:A7|A7]] and allow an AFD. Having seen the deleted article, there is a [[WP:CCS|credible claim of significance]] that deserves to be discussed rather than speedily deleted. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 17:06, 19 December 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Overturn''' the [[WP:A7|A7]] and allow an AFD. Having seen the deleted article, there is a [[WP:CCS|credible claim of significance]] that deserves to be discussed rather than speedily deleted. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 17:06, 19 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
*I'm confused. The A7 tag removed at 10:21 by {{U|Anarchyte}}, but deleted at 10:25 by {{U|RHaworth}}, four minutes after the tag was removed. [[WP:CSD]] says, {{tq|If an editor other than the creator removes a speedy deletion tag in good faith, it should be taken as a sign that the deletion is not uncontroversial and another deletion process should be used.}} {{U|RHaworth}}, could you give some insight into why this was deleted after the tag was removed? -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 17:20, 19 December 2019 (UTC) |
*I'm confused. The A7 tag removed at 10:21 by {{U|Anarchyte}}, but deleted at 10:25 by {{U|RHaworth}}, four minutes after the tag was removed. [[WP:CSD]] says, {{tq|If an editor other than the creator removes a speedy deletion tag in good faith, it should be taken as a sign that the deletion is not uncontroversial and another deletion process should be used.}} {{U|RHaworth}}, could you give some insight into why this was deleted after the tag was removed? -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 17:20, 19 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
* '''Close this discussion''' and start one at AfD. It was an edit conflict. I had the version of 2019-12-19 15:06:37 open in my browser but got distracted by something. I did the deletion at 15:25:46 on the basis of that version and thus never realised that at 15:21:55 the speedy tag had been removed. — [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 18:57, 19 December 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:57, 19 December 2019
19 December 2019
Energy Institute
This was deleted A7 after another admin objected and had been here since 2006. While I'm not sure if it's truly notable and was actually researching it myself for an AFD, I do think that it rises well above the low, low bar of A7. Praxidicae (talk) 15:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- I have undeleted so others may consider its history and the applicability of A7. As best as I can tell outside of one version deleted by Bradv there was no COPYVIO in what I restored despite the presence of an RD1 tag at the time of its speedy deletion. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Overturn the A7 and allow an AFD. Having seen the deleted article, there is a credible claim of significance that deserves to be discussed rather than speedily deleted. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:06, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- I'm confused. The A7 tag removed at 10:21 by Anarchyte, but deleted at 10:25 by RHaworth, four minutes after the tag was removed. WP:CSD says,
If an editor other than the creator removes a speedy deletion tag in good faith, it should be taken as a sign that the deletion is not uncontroversial and another deletion process should be used.
RHaworth, could you give some insight into why this was deleted after the tag was removed? -- RoySmith (talk) 17:20, 19 December 2019 (UTC) - Close this discussion and start one at AfD. It was an edit conflict. I had the version of 2019-12-19 15:06:37 open in my browser but got distracted by something. I did the deletion at 15:25:46 on the basis of that version and thus never realised that at 15:21:55 the speedy tag had been removed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:57, 19 December 2019 (UTC)