Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 21: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:21, 21 April 2020

< April 20	April 22 >

April 21

File:11 iamond with holes polyiamond tiling.png

Failed Prod - orphaned image with no information on an encyclopedic use. When uploader rejected prod, stated in edit summary "image used in the OEIS link supplied". The file itself does not appear to be used in the link, but seems to be a duplicate image of one of the links on the OEIS listed (in the last link of the Link section "Craig Knecht, Tilings with fixed triangles in a frame.") User has many similar orphaned images uploaded. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, as well as the rest of his uploads in a separate nom (too many to list). He is clearly promoting his mathematical art. Licensing is dubious as well. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:19, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:PhenX Toolkit Screenshot.jpg

Tagged US federal government, but stated author is RTI International, a private organization that claims copyright. Wikiacc (¶) 03:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polomolok.jpg

Found this image on the web. Possible copyvio, with incorrect desc.; certainly won't pass through Commons' "checkpoint." Also tagging two more files by this user, with doubtful origins. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

other affected files:

File:Unidentified beach (20111026T0910).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Bongao.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:WestcliffUWarriorsLogo.png

Delete per WP:NFCC#8/3. The logo is not the subject of critical commentary. It is the Westcliff University Athletics logo, not the Westcliff University logo (File:WestcliffULogo.png). — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:04, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Logo meets criteria under WP:NFCCP #8 Contextual significance since the logo is one of the primary identifications for the university significantly increase readers' understanding of the article. Additionally, the logo is added into the article at the infobox parameter designed to host that particular university logo. Many universities have multiple primary logos and often intertwined with athletics uses. As WP:UNIGUIDE Template:Infobox university notes, that infobox parameter is "Use for an athletics logo, corporate emblem, or similar graphic." As examples Here show, the university uses this logo significantly in conjunction with their other primary wordmark logo as primary university identification, including on major announcements such as COVID19 campus updates. In addition, universities often use athletics as a way to extend reach and branding, that relevantly connects to the use of athletics logos as many times those are more well known for general branding than other particular logos such as seals, etc... --Bhockey10 (talk) 16:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You only get one for identification per WP:NFC#CS. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Since universities often use logos like that as 1A and 1B to define their brand, that supports the inclusion for contextual significance. Per WP:NFC#CS, both provide WP:DUE Weight because the use of 1A and 1B logos balance each other as the two primary logos of the university. Other universities (often older ones) are balanced by a seal and logo. --Bhockey10 (talk) 15:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To identify a subject of discussion, depiction of a prominent aspect of the subject generally suffices, thus only a single item of non-free content meets the criterion. (emphasis added) — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Before debating NFCC points, this conversation might not even be needed looking into things more. Does WestcliffULogo even fall under WP:NFCC? Is it actually a public domain of "simple geometric shapes or text" similar to University of Michigan logo or University of Miami logo? If it is a PD-textlogo, that just requires a simple edit to change license and satisfies/negates all NFCC points. Bhockey10 (talk) 18:44, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Weeknd - After Hours (Target edition).jpeg

Image fails per both WP:NFCC#3a and #8. Additional image is not required to enhance the reader's understanding of the article in-question, After Hours (The Weeknd album), and its exclusion would not be detrimental of the reader's understanding. livelikemusic talk! 16:42, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The following image is discussed in the article's "Artwork and aesthetic" section, and its inclusion enhances the reader's understanding of that particular portion (and others as well) of the article, especially if they are art or photography minded. Also to individuals interested in the album's aesthetics whom suffer from Aphantasia or another similar condition, it can be detrimental, and thus the inclusion of the image can be particularly beneficial. DovahDuck (talk) 05:14, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Weeknd - After Hours (Remixes).jpg

Image fails per both WP:NFCC#3a and #8. Additional image is not required to enhance the reader's understanding of the article in-question, After Hours (The Weeknd album), and its exclusion would not be detrimental of the reader's understanding. livelikemusic talk! 16:42, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The following image is discussed in the article's "Artwork and aesthetic" section, and its inclusion enhances the reader's understanding of that particular portion (and others as well) of the article, especially if they are art or photography minded. Also to individuals interested in the album's aesthetics whom suffer from Aphantasia or another similar condition, it can be detrimental, and thus the inclusion of the image can be particularly beneficial. DovahDuck (talk) 05:14, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babbit cover (photo).jpg

This file was originally under File:Babbit.jpg but then the file now at File:Babbit cover (scan).jpg was uploaded there instead. I did split the file per the recommendation on my user talk page from Marchjuly as these aren't the same images and because the filename is vague, but now that begs the question of which file to use at Babbitt (novel).

The (scan) file is presumably in the public domain (the book was written in 1922) and if that's so the (photo) file might need to be deleted if it's copyrighted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:55, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:N4.road.boyle.bypass.JPG

Failed Prod (based on this diff on my talk page [1]. Image is orphaned and is simply a picture of a road. The writer on my talk page (who will be notified of this nom) indicated it had been used on a page but I can not see how it added any value there at all. He also suggested moving it to Commons, which is something someone could do if they wished. Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 This file was originally under [[:File:Babbit.jpg]] but then the file now at [[:File:Babbit cover (scan).jpg]] was uploaded there instead. I did split the file per the recommendation on my user talk page from {{U|Marchjuly}} as these aren't the same images and because the filename is vague, but now that begs the question of which file to use at [[Babbitt (novel)]]. <p> The (scan) file is presumably in the public domain (the book was written in 1922) and if that's so the (photo) file might need to be deleted if it's copyrighted. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]]) 11:55, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
+====[[:File:N4.road.boyle.bypass.JPG]]====
+:<span class="plainlinks nourlexpansion lx ffd-file" id="File:N4.road.boyle.bypass.JPG">[[:File:N4.road.boyle.bypass.JPG]] ([{{fullurl:File:N4.road.boyle.bypass.JPG|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3AFiles+for+discussion%2F2020+April+21%23File%3AN4.road.boyle.bypass.JPG%5D%5D}} delete] {{!}} [[File talk:N4.road.boyle.bypass.JPG|talk]] {{!}} [{{fullurl:File:N4.road.boyle.bypass.JPG|action=history}} history] {{!}} [[Special:WhatLinksHere/File:N4.road.boyle.bypass.JPG|links]] {{!}} [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3AN4.road.boyle.bypass.JPG}} logs])</span>&#x20;– uploaded by [[User talk:Ivanrlynn#File:N4.road.boyle.bypass.JPG listed for discussion|Ivanrlynn]] (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User talk:Ivanrlynn|action=edit&preload=Template:Fdw_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=File%3AN4.road.boyle.bypass.JPG&editintro=Template:Fdw_editintro&section=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify]</span> {{!}} [[Special:Contributions/Ivanrlynn|contribs]] {{!}} [[Special:ListFiles/Ivanrlynn|uploads]] {{!}} [[Special:Log/upload/Ivanrlynn|upload log]]).&nbsp;
+Failed Prod (based on this diff on my talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jordan_1972&curid=12119959&diff=952252603&oldid=950996316]. Image is orphaned and is simply a picture of a road.  The writer on my talk page (who will be notified of this nom) indicated it had been used on a page but I can not see how it added any value there at all.  He also suggested moving it to Commons, which is something someone could do if they wished. [[User:Jordan 1972|Jordan 1972]] ([[User talk:Jordan 1972|talk]]) 15:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)