Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Decrease: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:53, 11 March 2024

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection
Click here to return to Requests for page protection. Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection

Indefinite semi-protection: way fewer transclusions now. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 17:21, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

533 transclusions is still a fairly high number. Favonian (talk) 17:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But few enough that EC is likely enough protection. Thoughts, @TheresNoTime? Courcelles (talk) 17:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging TheresNoTime again, as they are active but might have missed the first ping. Same for the one below. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 13:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah thank you. @Courcelles: I'll defer to y'all, EC seems reasonable, same with below — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 13:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Noticed this one is template protected too. It has even fewer transclusions than Template:Taxonomy/Theriimorpha above. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 17:39, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same question, @TheresNoTime. Courcelles (talk) 18:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the chief minister has been chosen so the results are valid now

Automated comment: Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given. This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: @Cyberbot I: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57: protecting admin: any thoughts? Lectonar (talk) 13:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ::But few enough that EC is likely enough protection.  Thoughts, @[[User:TheresNoTime|TheresNoTime]]? [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] ([[User talk:Courcelles|talk]]) 17:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 *Pinging {{u|TheresNoTime}} again, as they are active but might have missed the first ping.  Same for the one below.  [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<b>2&cent;</b>]] 13:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
+*:Ah thank you. {{ping|Courcelles}} I'll defer to y'all, EC seems reasonable, same with below {{p}} — [[User:TheresNoTime|TheresNoTime]] ([[User talk:TheresNoTime|talk]] • they/them) 13:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 === [[:Template:Taxonomy/Prototribosphenida]] ===