Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anatomy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Credibility bot: new section
Line 57: Line 57:


As this is a highly active WikiProject, I would like to introduce you to [[User:Credibility bot|Credibility bot]]. This is a bot that makes it easier to track source usage across articles through automated reports and alerts. We piloted this approach at [[Wikipedia:Vaccine safety]] and we want to offer it to any subject area or domain. We need your support to demonstrate demand for this toolkit. If you have a desire for this functionality, or would like to leave other feedback, please endorse the tool or comment at [[WP:CREDBOT]]. Thanks! [[User:Harej|Harej]] ([[User talk:Harej|talk]]) 17:50, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
As this is a highly active WikiProject, I would like to introduce you to [[User:Credibility bot|Credibility bot]]. This is a bot that makes it easier to track source usage across articles through automated reports and alerts. We piloted this approach at [[Wikipedia:Vaccine safety]] and we want to offer it to any subject area or domain. We need your support to demonstrate demand for this toolkit. If you have a desire for this functionality, or would like to leave other feedback, please endorse the tool or comment at [[WP:CREDBOT]]. Thanks! [[User:Harej|Harej]] ([[User talk:Harej|talk]]) 17:50, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

:Thanks {{u|Harej}}, another useful project of yours. Would it be possible to run a once-off report? I am not sure we could sustain regular reports but it would be interesting to have a look at. [[User:Tom (LT)|Tom (LT)]] ([[User talk:Tom (LT)|talk]]) 23:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:42, 2 September 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Muscle tissue#Requested move 19 April 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – MaterialWorks 21:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Kidney#Requested move 3 July 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 21:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bad photos

I and @Claes Lindhardt have been working on the List of skeletal muscles of the human body and it has become clear that several of the muscles have "reused" images or are just scans of Gray's Anatomy 20th edition that do not really explain what the muscle is. For example, just for the head muscles:

I'm not really an illustrator, so what is the best way to go about fixing these? Mathnerd314159 (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Claes Lindhardt (talk) 21:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalene_muscles - have all the scalenus muscles except the minimus Claes Lindhardt (talk) 19:07, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interspinales_muscles have no picture yet Claes Lindhardt (talk) 21:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subcostalis_muscle also do not have a picture yet Claes Lindhardt (talk) 21:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coccygeus_muscle , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levator_ani also seems to be using the same primary pictures. There is a lot of articles using the same picture where both muscles are likely visable but not marked. This might not be a major issue, but it would be very neat to also have resolved. Claes Lindhardt (talk) 21:55, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
puboperinealis, pterygoideus proprius, Muscle of terminal notch, ceratocricoideus and puboprostaticus (males) / pubovaginalis (females) are also still missing pictures Claes Lindhardt (talk) 22:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Same goes for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triceps and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Articularis_cubiti_muscle Claes Lindhardt (talk) 12:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guideline on Multiple muslces in one article

Sometimes there is a lot of muscles covered in one article and sometimes each muscle get thier article, would it make sense to make a kind of guideline on when what makes sense? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 20:50, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Credibility bot

As this is a highly active WikiProject, I would like to introduce you to Credibility bot. This is a bot that makes it easier to track source usage across articles through automated reports and alerts. We piloted this approach at Wikipedia:Vaccine safety and we want to offer it to any subject area or domain. We need your support to demonstrate demand for this toolkit. If you have a desire for this functionality, or would like to leave other feedback, please endorse the tool or comment at WP:CREDBOT. Thanks! Harej (talk) 17:50, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Harej, another useful project of yours. Would it be possible to run a once-off report? I am not sure we could sustain regular reports but it would be interesting to have a look at. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]