Fossil preparation
| Part of a series on |
| Paleontology |
|---|
 |
|
Paleontology Portal Category |
Fossil preparation is the act of preparing fossil specimens for use in paleontological research or for exhibition, and involves removing the surrounding rocky matrix and cleaning the fossil.[1]
Techniques
Acid maceration
Acid maceration is a technique to extract organic microfossils from a surrounding rock matrix using acid. Hydrochloric acid or acetic acid may be used to extract phosphatic fossils, such as the small shelly fossils, from a carbonate matrix. Hydrofluoric acid is also used in acid macerations to extract organic fossils from silicate rocks. Fossiliferous rock may be immersed directly into the acid, or a cellulose nitrate film may be applied (dissolved in amyl acetate), which adheres to the organic component and allows the rock to be dissolved around it.[2]
Film pull
The film pull technique is a means of recovering carbonaceous compression fossils for study under transmitted light microscopy. An acid is applied to the surface of the rock to etch away the matrix from the surface, leaving carbonaceous tissue protruding. (Surfaces not to be etched can be coated in a wax (e.g. Vaseline or grease). This is usually accomplished by placing the rock upside-down in a weak, continually stirred acid, so that any debris can be washed away. Nitrocellulose is then painted on to the fossil-bearing surface, and once dry may be peeled from the rock, or the rock dissolved in hydrofluoric acid.[3]
The method was pioneered by John Walton in 1928 as a method to derive serial thin-sections without the time, expense and lost material incurred by dissolving the rock.[4] An improvement on the method, using gelatine (with glycerin and formalin) instead of cellulose, was reported in 1930, and is especially suitable for larger samples.[5] This solution-based method was largely superseded by the use of pre-formed sheets of film, similar to those used in overhead transparencies; cellulose nitrate and cellulose acetate can be used, although the latter is preferable.[6] By wetting the reverse surface of the film with acetate, the film becomes more labile and makes a better contact with the material. The peel can be washed in acid to remove any remaining matrix before mounting onto a slide with resin for further study.[7] The method is somewhat destructive, as the acid etching used to remove the rock matrix can also destroy some finer detail; the fizzing caused by the reaction of the acid with the matrix breaks up less-robust cellular material.[7] A second peel without further etching, a "rip peel", will remove any cell walls that are parallel to the surface, and would otherwise be destroyed when subjected to acid.[7]
Details of the modern application of the method can be found in reference ([8]). Even the latest technique does have some disadvantages; most notably, smaller fossils that may lie between cell walls will be washed away with the acid etch, and can only be recovered by a thin section preparation.[9]
In order to mount the slides for microscopy, a series of steps are necessary:[7]
- A glass slide is wetted with acetone, and a fresh layer of acetate is placed upon it. The acetone allows the acetate to 'suck' itself onto the slide, maintaining a good contact by suction. This will later be dissolved, allowing sections of the resin-mounted peel to be cut for transmission electron microscopy.
- A thin layer of epoxy resin is applied, covering the acetate and spreading onto the slide. This will serve to attach the preparation to the slide once the underlying acetate has been dissolved.
- A glass plate is greased, and the smooth side of a peel pressed down onto it.
- The rough side of this peel is covered with warmed (55 °C) epoxy resin, and pressed down onto the previously-prepared slide. After about 45 minutes the glass plate is removed, and the resin is left, warm, to cure.
- The preparation is washed in acetone and acid to remove any residues, which would otherwise produce optical artefacts when imaged.
Specimens recovered by film pull are prone to wrinkling, especially if the surface to be peeled is not perfectly smoothed—if acetone pools, it can cause the acetate to wrinkle.[8]
Transfer technique
The transfer technique is a technique to stabilise and prepare fossils by partially embedding them in plastic resins (i.e. epoxy or polyester) in order to preserve the position of the preserved fossil once all of the rock matrix is subsequently removed. Notable examples of this technique are fossils preserved in oil shale (such as those from the Messel Pit) or other substrates that will deteriorate under atmospheric conditions, or fossils preserved in acid-soluble carbonates (such as fossils from the Santana Formation).[10] The technique is notable for delivering exquisite preparations of both very high scientific and display value, as the area exposed in this method is protected by the matrix prior to the preparation, while the initially exposed fossils are often subject to damage from improper mechanical removal of sediment or where the plane of splitting has extended through the fossil. This allows the potential to preserve microscopic details on the surface of the fossil.[11]
The method was pioneered by Harry Toombs and A. E. Rixon of the British Museum in 1950[12] with the introduction of the technique as a means of extracting fish fossils from acid-soluble carbonates. The technique permitted the preparation of delicate, fragmented, or otherwise unstable fossils by the removal of virtually all of the surrounding rock matrix. The resulting preparation retains the position of all of the parts of the fossil in the position in which they were preserved in the fossil. While the method developed by Toombs and Rixon calls for plastic resins, other substances, such as a mix of ground chalk and beeswax have been used.[13]
While the original method was developed to deal with fossils freed from the matrix by acid, its most well known application is to the fossils from The Messel pit. These fossils, noted for their exquisite preservation, including soft tissue, body outline and even colour sheen on beetle wings, are notoriously difficult to preserve. The fossils themselves are flat, sometimes film-like on the surface of the rock layers. The oil shale contains 40% water. When a slab is broken free of surrounding rock, it will soon dry out and crack.[14] A slab with a perfect fossil will turn to a heap of rubble in a few hours, destroying the fossil with it. This was the fate of numerous Messel fossils until the transfer technique was started to be applied in the 1970s.
In order to preserve the fossils once their slab is taken out of the rock, the fossil need to be transferred from the rock surface on to a durable, artificial surface. The water in the fossil itself also needs to be replaced.
As soon as the slab bearing the fossil is worked free from the rock, it is submerged in water to stop it from cracking. This involves packing it in plastic and sometimes wet newspaper. While in the wet state, it is cleaned up and all preparation needed for the transfer conducted.[15]
Once ready for transfer, the fossil (but not the surrounding rock) is dried off with a blow-dryer. As soon as the fossil starts to lighten (a sign of drying), water-soluble lacquer is applied. The lacquer will penetrate the bone and other organic remains, but not the shale itself, as shale is impenetrable to watery solutions.
When the lacquer has set, a frame of modelling clay is built on the rock face around the fossil. A two-component epoxy is poured onto the frame, forming the new artificial surface for the fossil. The composition of the resin is important, as it will have to soak into the fossil to further strengthen it and to bind it to the new surface. This can be controlled by varying the resin viscosity.[11]
When the epoxy has set, the slab is turned over, and preparation begins from the shale at the back. Layer by layer of oil-shale is removed with brush and scalpel. When the preparator hits the fossil, more lacquer and glue is applied to further stabilize the fragile fossil. When the work is done, all traces of oil-shale have been removed, only the fossil itself remains on the epoxy slab.[16]
The contrasting physical property of the rock and fossil are essential for this technique to succeed. The organic remains of the fossil are porous and hygroscopic, while the oil-containing rock is not. Thus, the lacquer can penetrate fossils, and not rock, enabling the preparator to “glue” the fossil to the artificial slab, without at the same time gluing it to the shale.
References
- ^ Wylie, Caitlin Donahue (2009). "Preparation in action: Paleontological skill and the role of the fossil preparator". Fossil Preparation: Proceedings of the First Annual Fossil Preparation and Collections Symposium.
- ^ Edwards, D. (1982), "Fragmentary non-vascular plant microfossils from the late Silurian of Wales", Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 84 (3): 223–256, doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1982.tb00536.x
- ^ Hernick, L.; Landing, E.; Bartowski, K. (2008). "Earth's oldest liverworts—Metzgeriothallus sharonae sp. Nov. From the Middle Devonian (Givetian) of eastern New York, USA". Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 148 (2–4): 154–162. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2007.09.002.
- ^ Walton, J. (1928). "A Method of Preparing Sections of Fossil Plants contained in Coal Balls or in other Types of Petrifaction". Nature. 122 (3076): 571. Bibcode:1928Natur.122..571W. doi:10.1038/122571a0. S2CID 4102720.
- ^ Walton, J. (1930). "Improvements in the Peel-Method of Preparing Sections of Fossil Plants". Nature. 125 (3150): 413–414. Bibcode:1930Natur.125..413W. doi:10.1038/125413b0. S2CID 4083168.
- ^ Joy, K. W.; Willis, A. J.; Lacey, W. S. (1956). "A Rapid Cellulose Peel Technique in Palaeobotany". Annals of Botany. 20 (4): 635–637. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083546.
- ^ a b c d Holmes, J.; Lopez, J. (1986). "The disappearing peel technique: an improved method for studying permineralized plant tissues". Palaeontology. 29 (4). 787–808.
- ^ a b Galtier, J.; Phillips, T. L. (1999). "The acetate peel technique". In Jones, T. P.; Rowe, N. P. (eds.). Fossil Plants and Spores: Modern Techniques. The Geological Society, London. pp. 67–70. ISBN 978-1-86239-035-5.
- ^ Taylor, T. N.; Krings, M.; Dotzler, N.; Galtier, J. (2011). "The Advantage of Thin Section Preparations over Acetate Peels in the Study of Late Paleozoic Fungi and Other Microorganisms". PALAIOS. 26 (4): 239–244. Bibcode:2011Palai..26..239T. doi:10.2110/palo.2010.p10-131r. S2CID 128546972.
- ^ Maisey, J. G., Rutzky, I., Blum, S. & W. Elvers (1991): Laboratory Preparation Techniques. In Maisey, j:G. (ed): Santana Fossils: An Illustrated Atlas, Tfh Pubns Inc.ISBN 0866225498. pp 99–103.
- ^ a b Barling, Nathan; David M. Martill; Florence Gallien (2019). "The resin transfer technique: an application to insect fossils in laminated limestones of the Crato Formation (Lower Cretaceous) of north-east Brazil". Cretaceous Research. 98: 1–2. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2019.02.009.
- ^ Toombs, Harry; A. E. Rixon (1950). "The use of plastics in the "transfer method" of preparing fossils". The Museums Journal. 50: 105–107.
- ^ Keller, T.; Frey, E.; Hell, R.; Rietschel, S.; Schaal, S.; Schmitz, M. (1991). "Ein Regelwerk für paläontologische Grabungen in der Grube Messel". Paläontologische Zeitschrift. 65 (1–2): 221–224. doi:10.1007/BF02985786. S2CID 128399238.
- ^ Messel Oil Shale Fossil Site Lagerstatte, Virtual fossil museum website
- ^ Messel Research Station, Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum website
- ^ Messel Fossils from Germany website