Microstate

The world's five smallest sovereign states by area, from largest to smallest: San Marino, Tuvalu, Nauru, Monaco, and Vatican City shown in the same scale for size comparison

A microstate or ministate is a sovereign state having a very small population or very small land area, usually both. However, the meanings of "state" and "very small" are not well-defined in international law.^[1] Some recent attempts to define microstates have focused on identifying qualitative features that are linked to their size and population, such as partial delegation of their sovereignty to larger states, such as for international defense.

Commonly accepted examples of microstates include Andorra, Liechtenstein, the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Monaco, Nauru, Palau, San Marino and Tuvalu. The smallest political entity recognized as a sovereign state is Vatican City, with fewer than 1,000 residents and an area of only 49 hectares (120 acres). Some microstates – such as Monaco – are city-states consisting of a single municipality.

Definitions

Quantitative

Most scholars identify microstates by using a quantitative threshold and applying it to either one variable (such as the size of its territory^[2] or population^[3]) or a composite of different variables.^[4] While it is agreed that microstates are the smallest of all states, there is no consensus on what variable (or variables) or what cut-off point should be used to determine which political units should be labelled as "microstates" (as opposed to small "normal" states).^[1]^[5]^[6]^[7] According to some scholars the quantitative approach to defining microstates suffers from such problems as "inconsistency, arbitrariness, vagueness and inability to meaningfully isolate qualitatively distinct political units".^[5]

Sovereign states with a land area less than 1,000 km² (386 sq mi)^[8]^[9] ^[10]^[11] and/or with a population of less than 500,000 people^[8]
Rank	Country	Area (km² or sqmi)	Population	Density (pop./km²)	Capital	Continent	Subregion
1	Vatican City	0.44 km² (0.17 sq mi)	801	1913.6	Vatican City	Europe	Southern Europe
2	Monaco	2.02 km² (0.78 sq mi)	39,244	18469.3	Monaco City	Europe	Western Europe
3	Nauru	21 km² (8 sq mi)	10,834	451.8	Yaren	Oceania	Micronesia
4	Tuvalu	26 km² (10 sq mi)	11,448	414.7	Funafuti	Oceania	Polynesia
5	San Marino	61 km² (24 sq mi)	34,467	536.8	San Marino	Europe	Southern Europe
6	Liechtenstein	160 km² (62 sq mi)	39,425	233.2	Vaduz	Europe	Western Europe
7	Marshall Islands	181 km² (70 sq mi)	78,831	392.2	Majuro	Oceania	Micronesia
8	Saint Kitts and Nevis	261 km² (101 sq mi)	54,149	197.5	Basseterre	Americas	Caribbean
9	Maldives	298 km² (115 sq mi)	390,669	1320.8	Malé	Asia	South Asia
10	Malta	316 km² (122 sq mi)	514,564^[12]	1,633	Valletta	Europe	Southern Europe
11	Grenada	344 km² (133 sq mi)	113,570	320.2	St. George's	Americas	Caribbean
12	Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	389 km² (150 sq mi)	101,145	264.6	Kingstown	Americas	Caribbean
13	Barbados	430 km² (166 sq mi)	301,865	673.7	Bridgetown	Americas	Caribbean
14	Antigua and Barbuda	443 km² (171 sq mi)	99,175	206.1	St. John's	Americas	Caribbean
15	Seychelles	455 km² (176 sq mi)	96,387	201.4	Victoria	Africa	Eastern Africa
16	Palau	459 km² (177 sq mi)	21,613	46.2	Ngerulmud	Oceania	Micronesia
17	Andorra	468 km² (181 sq mi)	85,645	182.6	Andorra la Vella	Europe	Southern Europe
18	Saint Lucia	616 km² (238 sq mi)	166,637	265.2	Castries	Americas	Caribbean
19	Federated States of Micronesia	702 km² (271 sq mi)	101,675	150.5	Palikir	Oceania	Micronesia
20	Singapore	714 km² (276 sq mi)	5,866,139	8247.8	Singapore	Asia	Southeast Asia
21	Tonga	747 km² (288 sq mi)	105,780	142.5	Nukuʻalofa	Oceania	Polynesia
22	Dominica	751 km² (290 sq mi)	74,584	97.8	Roseau	Americas	Caribbean
23	Bahrain	765 km² (295 sq mi)	1,526,929	1491.4	Manama	Asia	Western Asia
24	Kiribati	811 km² (313 sq mi)	113,001	128.8	Tarawa	Oceania	Micronesia
25	São Tomé and Príncipe	1,001 km² (386 sq mi)	213,948	197.5	São Tomé	Africa	Central Africa
26	Samoa	2,831 km² (1,093 sq mi)	204,898	69.5	Apia	Oceania	Polynesia
27	Brunei	5,765 km² (2,226 sq mi)	471,103	73.3	Bandar Seri Begawan	Asia	Southeast Asia
28	Vanuatu	12,189 km² (4,706 sq mi)	303,009	21.9	Port Vila	Oceania	Melanesia
29	Bahamas	13,880 km² (5,359 sq mi)	352,655	23.2	Nassau	Americas	Caribbean
30	Belize	22,966 km² (8,867 sq mi)	405,633	14.8	Belmopan	Americas	Central America
31	Iceland	103,000 km² (39,769 sq mi)	354,234	3.1	Reykjavík	Europe	Northern Europe

- With the exception of The Bahamas, Belize, Brunei, Iceland, Samoa, and Vanuatu, all the above countries have a non-EEZ area less than 1,000 km² (386 sq mi).

- With the exception of Malta, Bahrain and Singapore, all the above countries have fewer than 500,000 people.

Qualitative

Some academics have suggested defining microstates according to the unique features that are linked to their geographic or demographic smallness.^[5]^[9]^[13] Newer approaches have proposed looking at the behaviour or capacity to operate in the international arena in order to determine which states should deserve the microstate label.^[13]^[14] Yet, it has been argued^{[by whom?]} that such approaches could lead to either confusing microstates with weak states^[6]^[9] (or failed states) or relying too much on subjective perceptions.^[5]

An alternative approach is to define microstates as "modern protected states".^[5] According to the definition proposed by Dumienski (2014): "microstates are modern protected states, i.e. sovereign states that have been able to unilaterally depute certain attributes of sovereignty to larger powers in exchange for benign protection of their political and economic viability against their geographic or demographic constraints."^[5] Adopting this approach permits limiting the number of microstates and separating them from both small states and autonomies or dependencies.^[5] Examples of microstates understood as modern protected states include such states as Liechtenstein, San Marino, Monaco, Niue, Andorra, the Cook Islands or Palau.

The smallest political unit recognized as a sovereign state is the Vatican City, though its precise status is sometimes disputed, e.g., Professor Maurice Mendelson, QC, argues that it does not meet the "traditional criteria of statehood".^[15]

Politics

Statistical research has shown that microstates are more likely to be democracies than larger states. In 2012, Freedom House classified 86% of the countries with less than 500,000 inhabitants as "free".^[16] This shows that countries with small populations often had a high degree of political freedom and civil liberties, which is one of the hallmarks of democracies. Some scholars have taken the statistical correlation between small size and democracy as a sign that smallness is beneficial to the development of a democratic political system,^[17] mentioning social cohesiveness, opportunities for direct communication and homogeneity of interests as possible explanations for why this is the case.^[16]^[18]

Case study research, however, has led researches to believe that the statistical evidence belies the anti-democratic elements of microstate politics.^[16]^[19] Due to small populations, family and personal relations are often decisive in microstate politics. In some cases, this impedes neutral and formal decision-making and instead leads to undemocratic political activity, such as clientelism, corruption, particularism and executive dominance.^[16] While microstates often have formal institutions that are associated with democracy, the inner workings of politics in microstates are in reality often undemocratic.

The high number of democracies amongst microstates could be explained by their colonial history.^[16]^[17] Most microstates adopted the same political system as their colonial ruler.^[20] Because of the high number of microstates that were British colonies in the past, microstates often have a majoritarian and parliamentary political system similar to the Westminster system.^[17] Some microstates with a history as British colony have implemented some aspects of a consensus political system, to adapt to their geographic features or societal make-up.^[20] While the colonial history often determines what political systems microstates have, they do implement changes to better accommodate their specific characteristics.

Microstates and international relations

Microstates often rely on other countries in order to survive, as they have a small military capacity and a lack of resources. This had led some researchers to believe that microstates are forced to subordinate themselves to larger states which reduces their sovereignty.^[21] Research, however, has shown that microstates strategically engage in patron-client relationships with other countries.^[22] This allows them to trade some privileges to countries that can advance their interests the most. Examples of this are microstates that establish a tax haven or sell their support in international committees in exchange for military and economic support.^[21]

Historical anomalies and aspirant states

A small number of tiny sovereign political units have been founded on historical anomalies or eccentric interpretations of law. These types of states, often labelled as "microstates," are usually located on small (usually disputed) territorial enclaves, generate limited economic activity founded on tourism and philatelic and numismatic sales, and are tolerated or ignored by the nations from which they claim to have seceded.

The Republic of Indian Stream – now the town of Pittsburg, New Hampshire – was a geographic anomaly left unresolved by the Treaty of Paris that ended the U.S. Revolutionary War, and claimed by both the U.S. and Canada. Between 1832 and 1835, the area's residents refused to acknowledge either claimant.

The Cospaia Republic became independent through a treaty error and survived from 1440 to 1826. Its independence made it important in the introduction of tobacco cultivation to Italy.

Couto Misto was disputed by Spain and Portugal, and operated as a sovereign state until the 1864 Treaty of Lisbon partitioned the territory, with the larger part becoming part of Spain.

Jaxa was a small state that existed during the 17th century at the border between Tsardom of Russia and Qing China. Despite its location in East Asia, the state's primary language was Polish.

References

^ ^a ^b Warrington, E. (1994). "Lilliputs Revisited". Asian Journal of Public Administration, 16(1).
^ Mehmet, O. & Tahiroglu, M., 2002. Growth and equity in microstates: Does size matter in development? International Journal of Social Economics, 29(1/2), pp.152–162.
^ Boyce, P.J. & Herr, R.A., 2008. Microstate diplomacy in the south pacific. Australian Outlook, (April 2012), pp.37–41.
^ Reid, G.L., 1975. Impact of Very Small Size on the International Behaviour of Microstates (International Studies), SAGE Publications Ltd.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g Dumienski, Zbigniew (2014). "Microstates as Modern Protected States: Towards a New Definition of Micro-Statehood" (PDF). Occasional Paper. Centre for Small State Studies. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-14. Retrieved 2014-06-07. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^ ^a ^b Neemia, U., 1995. Smallness, islandness and foreign policy behaviour: aspects of island microstates foreign policy behaviour with special reference to Cook Islands and Kiribati. University of Wollongong.
^ Dommen, E., 1985. States, Microstates and Islands, Routledge Kegan & Paul.
^ ^a ^b "CIA – The World Factbook – Rank Order – Population". CIA. Retrieved 2021-12-02.
^ ^a ^b ^c Amstrup, N., 1976. The Perennial Problem of Small States: A Survey of Research Efforts. Cooperation and Conflict, 11(2), pp. 163–182.
^ "CIA – The World Factbook – Rank Order – Area". CIA. Archived from the original on June 13, 2007. Retrieved 2008-06-20.
^ "Demographic Yearbook—Table 3: Population by sex, rate of population increase, surface area and density" (PDF). United Nations Statistics Division. 2008. Retrieved 2011-06-12. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^ "News release" (PDF). National Statistics Office. 10 July 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 July 2020. Retrieved 10 July 2020.
^ ^a ^b Neumann, I.B. & Gstöhl, S., 2004. Lilliputians in Gulliver’s World ? Small States in International Relations.
^ Oest, K.J.N. & Wivel, A., 2010. Security, profit or shadow of the past? Explaining the security strategies of microstates. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(3), pp. 429–453.
^ Mendelson, M. H. (1972). "Diminutive States in the United Nations". The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 21(4), pp.609–630.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Veenendaal, W. (2015). "Democracy in microstates: why smallness does not produce a democratic political system", Democratization, 22(1): 92-112.
^ ^a ^b ^c Anckar, D. (2004). "Regime Choices in Microstates: The Cultural Constraint", Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 42(2): 206-223.
^ Corbett, J. (2015). ""Everybody knows everybody": practising politics in the Pacific Islands", Democratization, 22(1): 51-72.
^ Erk, J. and Veenendaal, W. (2014). "Is Small Really Beautiful? The Microstate Mistake", Journal of Democracy, 25(3): 135-148.
^ ^a ^b Anckar, D. (2008). "Microstate Democracy: Majority or Consensus; Diffusion or Problem-Solving?", Democratization, 15(1): 67-85.
^ ^a ^b Sharman, J.C. (2017). "Sovereignty at the Extremes: Micro-States in World Politics", Political Studies, 65(3): 559-575.
^ Veenendaal, W. (2017). "Analyzing the Foreign Policy of Microstates: The Relevance of the International Patron-Client Model", Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(3): 561-577.