Jump to content

Caiman australis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Leomk0403 (talk | contribs) at 11:41, 4 May 2023 (+{{Taxonbar}}, <references /> to {{Reflist}} (SpeciesHelper)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Caiman australis is an extinct species of caiman described in 1858 on the basis of a left maxilla that was collected from the Upper Miocene age Ituzaingó Formation of Entre Rios, Argentina.[1][2]

Caiman australis
Temporal range: Late Miocene, 9.0–7.3 Ma
↓
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Clade: Archosauromorpha
Clade: Archosauriformes
Order: Crocodilia
Family: Alligatoridae
Subfamily: Caimaninae
Clade: Jacarea
Genus: Caiman
Species:
†C. australis
Binomial name
†Caiman australis
(Bravard, 1858)
Synonyms
  • Crocodilus australis
    Bravard, 1858
  • Alligator australis
    (Bravard, 1858)
  • Proalligator australis
    (Bravard, 1858)

Etymology

The species name “australis” comes from the Greek root austral, which means “southern” after its discovery in South America.[1]

Discovery and taxonomy

Caiman australis was first described by French engineer Auguste Bravard, who had been hired by the Museo de la Confederación,[1] on the basis of a complete left maxilla that had been collected from Upper Miocene strata belonging to the Ituzaingó Formation along the banks of the Parana River in Entre Ríos Province, Argentina.[3][2] Bravard named it Crocodilus australis in 1858, believing that it was a species of crocodile due to its elongated maxilla.[1] It was the first named “Mesopotamian” species and the only one known for 2 decades.[3][1] Bravard gave it a very brief description, but Hermann Burmeister and Cayetano Rovereto gave more detailed descriptions in 1883[4] and 1912 respectively.[5] The species was placed in several genera by different authors, with Juan B. Ambrosetti placing it in Proalligator in 1887,[6] Florentino Ameghino placed it in Alligator in 1898,[7] until it was finally placed in Caiman in 2012.[3] Some additional fossils have been suggested to be from the species, but a lack of overlap prevents definitive assignment.[3]

Description

Due to the fragmentary nature of the holotype, few diagnostic traits are known for Caiman australis. C. australis had a narrow snout, with a narrower and longer maxilla than living Caiman species. The 3rd and 4th alveoli are the largest alveoli and are similarly sized, with smaller interalvelovar spaces on the maxilla. The first, second and fifth to ninth alveoli are similar in size, and the third and fourth alveoli are the largest of the maxillary tooth row, a characteristic present in some other Caiman species. The lateral margin of maxilla is also less festooned than in other Caiman species, in dorsal and lateral view. The maxilla is also adorned with an unusual predominance of prominent and elongated grooves and bumps.[3]

Paleoenvironment

Fossils of Caiman australis have been recovered from the Ituzaingó Formation of Entre Rios, Argentina, which preserves vast tidal flats similar to those in the modern day Amazon and a warm climate.[8] Large, herbivorous notoungulate mammals in the Ituzaingó Formation were widespread, including the toxodontids Xotodon and Adinotherium,[9] and litopterns such as Brachytherium, Cullinia, Diadiaphorus, Neobrachytherium, Oxyodontherium, Paranauchenia, Promacrauchenia, Proterotherium and Scalabrinitherium.[10] Large, armored glyptodonts like Palaehoplophorus, Eleutherocercus, and Plohophorus[11] lived in the area as well as other cingulates like the pampatheres Kraglievichia[11] and Scirrotherium.[12] Carnivores included the phorusrhacids Devincenzia and Andalgalornis[13] and sparassodonts,[14] with giant crocodilians like Gryposuchus and Mourasuchus in the freshwater.[15] Bamboos, coconut palms, and other palms were prevalent.[16]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Bravard, A. (1858). Monografıa de los terrenos marinos terciarios del Paraná. Diario oficial del Gobierno: El Nacional Argentino.[Reprinted as Burmeister, G. 1883.].
  2. ^ a b Bona, P., & Barrios, F. (2015). The Alligatoroidea of Argentina: an update of its fossil record. Publicación Electrónica de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, 51.
  3. ^ a b c d e Bona, P., Riff, D., & de Gasparini, Z. B. (2012). Late Miocene crocodylians from northeast Argentina: new approaches about the austral components of the Neogene South American crocodylian fauna. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 103(3-4), 551-570.
  4. ^ Burmeister, G. (1883). Reprint of Bravard, 1858: Monografía de los terrenos marinos terciarios del Paraná. Annales del Museo Público de Buenos Aires, 3, 45-94.
  5. ^ Rovereto, G. (1912). Los cocodrilos fósiles en las capas de Paraná. Museo nacional de hist. nat. de Buenos Aires.
  6. ^ Ambrosetti, J. B. (1887). Observaciones sobre los reptiles fósiles oligocenos de los terrenos terciarios antiguos del Paraná.
  7. ^ Ameghino, F. (1898). Sinopsis geológico-paleontológica de la República Argentina. Segundo censo de la República Argentina, 1.
  8. ^ Cione, A. L., Dahdul, W. M., Lundberg, J. G., & Machado-Allison, A. (2009). Megapiranha paranensis, a new genus and species of Serrasalmidae (Characiformes, Teleostei) from the upper Miocene of Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 29(2), 350-358.
  9. ^ Schmidt, G. I. (2013). Los ungulados nativos (Litopterna y Notoungulata: Mammalia) del “Mesopotamiense”(Mioceno Tardío) de Entre Ríos, Argentina. Publicación Electrónica de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, 14(1).
  10. ^ Schmidt, G. I. (2013). Litopterna y Notoungulata (Mammalia) de la Formación Ituzaingó (Mioceno tardío-Plioceno) de la Provincia de Entre Ríos: sistemática, bioestratigrafía y paleobiogeografía (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Nacional de La Plata).
  11. ^ a b Scillato, G. J. (2013). Los Cingulata (Mammalia, Xenarthra) del “Conglomerado Osífero”(Mioceno tardío) de la Formación Ituzaingó de Entre Ríos, Argentina. Publicación Electrónica de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, 14(1).
  12. ^ Góis, Flávio; Scillato-Yané, Gustavo Juan; Carlini, Alfredo Armando; Guilherme, Edson (2013-06-01). "A new species of Scirrotherium Edmund & Theodor, 1997 (Xenarthra, Cingulata, Pampatheriidae) from the late Miocene of South America". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 37 (2): 177–188. doi:10.1080/03115518.2013.733510. ISSN 0311-5518. S2CID 129039539.
  13. ^ Alvarenga, Herculano M.F.; Höfling, Elizabeth (2003). "Systematic revision of the Phorusrhacidae (Aves: Ralliformes)". Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia. 43 (4). doi:10.1590/S0031-10492003000400001. ISSN 0031-1049.
  14. ^ Babot, J. M., & Ortiz, P. E. (2009). Primer registro de Borhyaenoidea (Mammalia, Metatheria, Sparassodonta) en la provincia de Tucumán (Formación India Muerta, Grupo Choromoro; Mioceno tardío). Acta Geológica Lilloana, 34-48.
  15. ^ Riff, D., Romano, P. S. R., Oliveira, G. R., & Aguilera, O. A. (2010). Neogene crocodile and turtle fauna in northern South America. Amazonia. Landscapes and Species Evolution: A Look Into the Past, 259-280.
  16. ^ Franco, M. J., & Brea, M. (2015). First extra-Patagonian record of Podocarpaceae fossil wood in the Upper Cenozoic (Ituzaingó Formation) of Argentina. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 53(2), 103-116.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Caiman_australis&oldid=1153132288"