Linder v. United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by R'n'B (talk | contribs) at 16:53, 2 March 2020 (Disambiguating links to Schedule 1 (link changed to Controlled Substances Act#Schedule_I_controlled_substances) using DisamAssist.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Linder v. United States
Argued March 9, 1925
Decided April 13, 1925
Full case nameCharles O. Linder v. United States
Citations268 U.S. 5 (more)
45 S. Ct. 446; 69 L. Ed. 819; 1925 U.S. LEXIS 545
Case history
PriorFrom District Court, Eastern District of Washington
Court membership
Chief Justice
William H. Taft
Associate Justices
Oliver W. Holmes Jr. · Willis Van Devanter
James C. McReynolds · Louis Brandeis
George Sutherland · Pierce Butler
Edward T. Sanford · Harlan F. Stone
Case opinion
MajorityMcReynolds, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Harrison Narcotics Tax Act
Superseded by
Controlled Substance Act

Linder v. United States, 268 U.S. 5 (1925), is a Supreme Court case involving the applicability of the Harrison Act. The Harrison Act was originally a taxing measure on drugs such as morphine and cocaine, but it later effectively became a prohibition on such drugs. However, the Act had a provision exempting doctors prescribing the drugs. Dr. Charles O. Linder prescribed the drugs to addicts in Moore, Oklahoma, which the federal government said was not a legitimate medical practice. He was prosecuted and convicted. Linder appealed, and the Supreme Court unanimously overturned his conviction, holding that the federal government overstepped its power to regulate medicine. The opinion of the court was written by Justice James Clark McReynolds and states, "Obviously, direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of the federal government."[1]

Current implication

With the passage of myriad later laws, including the Controlled Substance Act which gives no exemption whatsoever to Schedule I drugs, and the end of Lochner era, the holding of Linder has now been mostly overruled[citation needed] or superseded. However, the rationale of the case was later used to stop the Department of Justice from interfering with Oregon's assisted suicide laws in the case Gonzales v. Oregon.

See also

References

  1. ^ Linder v. United States, 268 U.S. 5 (1925).

External links