Jump to content

M18 Hellcat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alexf (talk | contribs) at 18:38, 19 May 2020 (Reverted edits by 46.216.36.113 (talk) to last version by Magic links bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

76 mm Gun Motor Carriage M18
TypeTank destroyer
Place of originUnited States
Service history
Wars
Production history
Designed1942
ManufacturerBuick Motor Division of General Motors
Unit costUS$55,230 (equivalent to $955,928 in 2023)[1]
ProducedJuly 1943 – October 1944
No. built2,507
Specifications ([2])
Mass39,000 lb (20 short tons; 18 t)
Length
  • 17 ft 4 in (5.28 m) hull
  • 21 ft 10 in (6.65 m) including gun
Width9 ft 5 in (2.87 m)
Height8 ft 5 in (2.57 m) over antiaircraft machine gun
Crew5 (Commander, gunner, loader, driver, assistant driver)
Armor4.8–25.4 mm (0.19–1.00 in)
Main
armament
76 mm gun M1A1, M1A1C, or M1A2
45 rounds
Secondary
armament
.50 caliber (12.7 mm) Browning M2HB machine gun
800 rounds
Engine
Power/weight19.8–22.6 hp (14.8–16.9 kW)/tonne
Transmission900T Torqmatic automatic transmission
3 speeds forward, 1 reverse
SuspensionTorsion bar
Fuel capacity165 US gal (620 L)
Operational
range
100 mi (160 km) on road
Maximum speed
  • 45 mph (72 km/h) on road
  • 26 mph (42 km/h) off road

The M18 Hellcat (officially designated the 76 mm Gun Motor Carriage M18 or M18 GMC) was an American tank destroyer of World War II, also used in the Korean War. It was the fastest U.S. armored fighting vehicle on the road.[3] The speed was attained by keeping armor to a minimum, using the innovative Torqmatic automatic transmission, and by equipping the relatively light vehicle with the same main gun used on the much larger Sherman tank.

The Hellcat was the most effective U.S. tank destroyer of World War II. It had a higher kill to loss ratio than any other tank or tank destroyer fielded by U.S. forces in World War II.[4][5]

Development

When the Tank Destroyer Force was organized in 1941, their commander, Lieutenant Colonel (later General) Andrew Davis Bruce envisioned the units being equipped with something faster than a tank, with a better gun but less armor to allow for speed; a cruiser rather than a battleship.[6] He objected to the 3 inch M10 Gun Motor Carriage because it was too heavy and slow for his needs,[7] and later on to the 90 mm M36 Gun Motor Carriage because it was essentially an M10 with a bigger gun.[8] The United States Ordnance Corps made several failed attempts to provide said vehicle using the weapons (the 37 mm, 57 mm, 3 inch, 75 mm and finally the lightweight 76 mm of 1942–1943) and technology available, including mounting the 3-inch gun on the fast M3 Light Tank chassis.[9] The M18 was the end product of a long line of research vehicles aimed at providing the desired machine.

In December 1941, the Ordnance Department issued a requirement for the design of a fast tank destroyer using a Christie suspension, a Wright-Continental R-975 radial aircraft engine, and a 37 mm gun. Two pilot vehicles were to be built.[10] What became the M18 originated in Harley Earl's design studio, part of the Buick Motor Division of General Motors. Previously, basic designs for other kinds of vehicles had mostly originated from within the Ordnance Department. Buick's engineers used a torsion bar suspension that provided a steady ride.[a] Though it weighed about 20 tons, the Hellcat was capable of traveling upwards of 45 mph. Its power came from Wright R-975, a nine-cylinder, 350-to-400-horsepower radial aircraft engine, paired to a three-speed 900T Torqmatic automatic transmission.

Changes to the specification mean that the first pilot – the 57 mm Gun Motor Carriage T49 – was built with the British (57 mm) QF 6-pounder gun instead of the 37 mm and a torsion bar suspension instead of the Christie suspension. It was tested in 1942 but the army wanted a heavier gun – the same 75 mm gun M3 as used on the M4 Sherman medium tank. The T49 project was cancelled and the second pilot was built with the 75 mm gun as the 75 mm Gun Motor Carriage T67. This met approval, but in early 1943 the army requested a more powerful gun – the 76 mm gun M1 under development for the Sherman. Six pilot models – as the 76 mm Gun Motor Carriage T70 – were built with this gun. The trials of these models led to a new turret and changes to the hull front, but the design was otherwise accepted for production, which began in July 1943.[10]

Once developed, the Hellcat was tested in the same manner as passenger cars before and after it, at the General Motors Milford Proving Ground. Top speed testing was done on a paved, banked oval and ride quality tests were done over specially developed stretches of bumps. The M18 also required tests of its ability to ford six feet of water, climb small walls, and ram through structures.

The first models of the tank destroyer were tested by the US Army's 704th Tank Destroyer Battalion. The unit had originally been trained on the M3 Gun Motor Carriage (a 75 mm gun installed in the bed of an M3 half-track). Despite its T70 prototypes requiring several improvements, the 704th had a "superlative" testing record, and the unit was later issued production Hellcats after many of their suggestions were integrated into the vehicle. The testing phase of the Hellcat proved that teamwork was an essential element of the new light tank destroyer units[citation needed], and replaced the fixed, rigid structure of other units with a much more flexible command structure that allowed adapting to more complicated tasks.[11]

Design

The M18's new design incorporated several labor saving and innovative maintenance features. It used the same Wright R975 engine as the Sherman tank, but turned 90 degrees in order to have a lower profile. The fully unitized drivetrain was much easier to maintain, as it was mounted on rails equipped with steel rollers that allowed maintenance crews to disconnect it easily from the transmission, roll it out onto the lowered engine rear cover using rails, service it, and then reconnect it to the transmission. The transmission could also be removed easily and rolled out onto a front deck plate to facilitate quick inspection and repairs.

In contrast to the M10 and M36, tank destroyers, which used the heavy chassis of the M4 Sherman, the M18 Hellcat was designed from the start to be a fast tank destroyer. As a result, it was smaller, lighter, more comfortable, and significantly faster, but carried the same gun as the Sherman 76 mm models. The M18 carried a five-man crew, consisting of a commander, gunner, loader, driver, and assistant driver. 45 rounds of main gun ammunition were carried, 9 in the turret and 18 in each sponson. An M2 Browning machine gun with 800 rounds of ammunition was provided on a flexible ring mount for use against enemy aircraft and infantry.

Armor

The armor of the M18 Hellcat was quite light to facilitate its high speed, and provided very little protection from the most commonly used German antitank weapons. At the time, even thickly armored Allied tanks were unable to withstand most German antitank weapons, so reduction of armor had little negative effect on survival compared to most other Allied tanks of the period. The lower hull armor was 12.7 mm (0.50 in) thick all around, vertical on the sides, but sloped at 35 degrees from the vertical at the lower rear. The lower front hull was also 12.7 mm (0.50 in) thick, being angled twice to form a nearly rounded shape; 53 degrees from the vertical and then 24 degrees from the vertical. The hull floor was only 4.8 mm (0.19 in) The upper hull armor was also 12.7 mm (0.50 in) thick, being angled at 23 degrees from the vertical on the sides and 13 degrees from the vertical at the rear. The lower front hull's angled construction was also used to form the Hellcat's sloping glacis; two plates were angled at 38 and 24 degrees from the vertical, respectively. The hull roof was 7.9 mm (0.31 in) The cast turret of the Hellcat was 25.4 mm (1.00 in) thick on the front (at a 23 degree angle from the vertical) and 12.7 mm (0.50 in) thick on the sides (angled at 23 degrees from the vertical) and rear (angled at 9 degrees from the vertical) The front of the turret was further protected by a rounded cast gun mantlet which was 19 mm (0.75 in) thick.

The main disadvantages of the M18 were its very light armor protection and open-topped turret, and the inconsistent performance of its 76 mm gun against the frontal armor of later German designs such as the Tiger and Panther. The open-topped turret—a characteristic which it shared with all American tank destroyers—left the crew exposed to snipers, grenades, and shell fragments, however it gave the crew excellent visibility which was of importance in the killing of tanks, the intent of tank destroyers being primarily ambush weapons. The doctrinal priority of high speed at the cost of armor protection thus led to a relatively unbalanced design. The problem of the main gun performance was remedied with High Velocity Armor Piercing (HVAP) ammunition late in the war, which allowed the 76 mm gun to achieve greater armor penetration, but this was never available in quantity.[12] The 76 mm gun with standard ammunition could penetrate the frontal turret armor of Panther tanks only at very close ranges,[13] whereas the HVAP ammunition gave it a possibility of effectively engaging some of the heavier German tanks and allowing to penetrate the Panther turret at ranges of about 1,000 m (1,100 yd).[14][15]

Production

Original plans called for a total of 8,986 M18s to be supplied – 1,600 for Lend-Lease to other countries and 7,386 for the U.S. Army. The production plans of the M18 were curtailed to 2,507 vehicles, including the six pilot models. 10 were later converted into T41/T41E1 command vehicle and prime mover prototypes, and 640 were converted into M39 Armored Utility Vehicles. The reasons behind the reduction (in no particular order) were:

  • The 76mm gun was already inadequate for later German tanks and The Army Ground Forces preferred to get the 90 mm Gun Motor Carriage M36 into service, despite Tank Destroyer Force commander Andrew Bruce's objections to adopting it
  • The number of self-propelled tank destroyer battalions had been approximately halved due to a policy change forced by the AGF, who wanted towed guns to be used and hence far fewer self-propelled units were needed for the Tank Destroyers
  • There was little potential Lend-Lease activity: Britain and the Soviet Union "had little interest".[16] Two, listed as "T70", were transferred to the United Kingdom, and five to the Soviet Union.[17]

Production of M18 Hellcats ran from July 1943 until October 1944, with 2,507 built. Several changes were made during production. The first 684 M18s experienced problems with their transmission gear ratios which meant they could not climb steep slopes, and were returned to the factory for modification. Most of these early vehicles remained at the Buick factory after modification. Ten were later converted to T41/T41E1 command vehicle and prime mover prototypes, and 640 were converted to M39 Armored Utility Vehicles. The rest of the M18s built featured an improved transmission. The 76 mm gun M1 fitted to most Hellcats kicked up large amounts of dust when fired. This was enough to impede the vision of the crew, who had to wait until the muzzle blast cleared to fire accurately again. To solve this problem, the 76 mm gun M1 was replaced with the muzzle brake-equipped 76 mm gun M1A2 as soon as it became available; in the interim, the M1A1C gun, threaded for a muzzle brake but not so equipped, was used. Beginning in June 1944, roughly the last 700 Hellcats received the M1A2 gun. Hellcats with serial numbers 1350 and below had the naturally-aspirated R975-C1 engine, which produced 350 horsepower. The ventilation grate for the transmission and oil coolers behind the driver's hatch on these early Hellcats had a bulged shape, protruding above the line of the upper hull. M18s with serial numbers 1351 and above had the internally-modified supercharged R975-C4 engine, which produced 400 horsepower. At roughly the same time as the change in engine type, the shape of the ventilation grate was changed to be flush with the upper hull.[18]

There were three production contracts for the Hellcat: RAD-563 covered the six pilot models. T-6641 was for the first 1,000 vehicles, and T-9167 was for the final 1,507 vehicles.[19][20]

Production of M18[20][21]
Model Quantity Contract Number Serial Number Registration Number
Pilot 6 RAD-563 none assigned 40128384 through 40128389
M18 1,000 T-6641 1 through 1000 40108110 through 40109109
M18 1,507 T-9167 1007 through 2513 40114883 through 40146389
Production of M18[19][21][22]
Month M18
July 1943 6
August 1943 83
September 1943 112
October 1943 150
November 1943 267
December 1943 194
January 1944 250
February 1944 218
March 1944 170
April 1944 150
May 1944 150
June 1944 150
July 1944 150
August 1944 150
September 1944 150
October 1944 157
Total 2,507

Combat performance

World War II

M18 Hellcat of the 824th Tank Destroyer Battalion in action at Wiesloch, Germany, April 1945

The M18 served primarily in Western Europe, but was also present in the Pacific. M18 strength in the European Theatre of Operations varied from 136 in June 1944 to a high of 540 in March 1945. Losses totaled 216.[23] Kills claimed were 526 in total: 498 in Europe, 17 in Italy, and 11 in the Pacific. The kills-to-losses ratio for Europe was 2.3 to 1 and the overall kill to loss ratio was 2.4 to 1.[24]

M18s were “…not primarily used for tank fighting, but were committed more often to improvised roles, usually direct fire support for infantry.” [25]

European Theatre

The T70 prototype of the M18 first saw combat at Anzio, Italy, and production versions of the M18 were used in North-West Europe and Italy from the summer of 1944 onwards. Typically, every US Infantry or Armored Division had a Tank Destroyer Battalion attached on a long-term basis.

On 19 September 1944, in the Nancy bridgehead near Arracourt, France, the 704th Tank Destroyer Battalion was attached to the 4th Armored Division. Lt. Edwin Leiper led one M18 platoon of C Company to Rechicourt-la-Petite, on the way to Moncourt. He saw a German tank gun muzzle appearing out of the fog 30 feet away, and deployed his platoon. In a five-minute period, five German tanks of the 113th Panzer Brigade were knocked out for the loss of one M18.[citation needed] The platoon continued to fire and destroyed ten more German tanks while losing another two M18s. One of the platoon's M18s commanded by Sgt Henry R. Hartman knocked out six of the German tanks, most of which were the much-feared Panthers.[26]

The M18 Hellcat was a key element during World War II in the Battle of the Bulge.[27] On December 19–20, Team Desobry, a battalion-sized tank-infantry task force of the 10th Armored Division was assigned to defend Noville located north-northeast of both Foy and of Bastogne, just 4.36 mi (7.02 km) away. With just four[28] M18 tank destroyers of the 705th Tank Destroyer Battalion to assist, the paratroopers of 1st Battalion of the 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment attacked units of the 2nd Panzer Division, whose mission was to proceed by secondary roads via Monaville (just northwest of Bastogne) to seize a key highway and capture, among other objectives, fuel dumps—for the lack of which the overall German counter-offensive faltered and failed. Worried about the threat to its left flank in Bastogne, it organized a major joint arms attack to seize Noville. Team Desobry's high-speed highway journey to reach the blocking position is one of the few documented cases[28] in which the top speed of the M18 Hellcat – 50 mph (80 km/h) – was actually used to get ahead of an enemy force.[28]

The attack of 1st Battalion and the M18 Hellcat tank destroyers of the 705th TD Battalion near Noville together destroyed at least 30 German tanks and inflicted 500 to 1,000 casualties on the attacking forces, in what amounted to a spoiling attack. A Military Channel historian credited the M18 destroyers with 24 kills, including several Tiger tanks, and believes that in part, their ability to "shoot and scoot" at high speed and then reappear elsewhere on the battlefield, confused and slowed the German attack, which finally stalled, leaving the Americans in control of the town overnight.[28]

Pacific Theatre

M18s served in tank destroyer battalions supporting US Army infantry divisions in the latter stages of the war, notably in the Philippines and Okinawa. M18s were not issued to Marine Corps units.

Korean War

An M39 carrier used in the Korean War
Main article: M39 Armored Utility Vehicle

The M18 saw service primarily as the turret-less M39 Armored Utility Vehicle which was used as a prime mover, infantry carrier, and ammunition carrier. A number of variants were proposed including a mobile command post, howizer variant, and flamethrower variant. The tank destroyer was also used as its original purpose intended.[29]

Tank destroyer doctrine

Main article: Tank destroyer

U.S. combined arms doctrine on the eve of World War II held that tanks should be designed to fulfill the role of forcing a breakthrough into enemy rear areas. Separate GHQ tank battalions supported infantry in destroying fixed enemy defenses, and armored divisions then exploited the breakthrough to rush into the enemy's vulnerable rear areas. U.S. tanks were expected to fight any hostile tanks they encountered in their attack, but the mission of destroying massed enemy armored thrusts was assigned to a new branch, the Tank Destroyer Force. Tank destroyer units were meant to counter German blitzkrieg tactics. Tank destroyer units were to be held as a reserve at the corps or army level, and were to move quickly to the site of any massed enemy tank breakthrough, maneuvering aggressively and using ambush tactics (charging or chasing enemy tanks was explicitly prohibited) to destroy enemy tanks. This led to a requirement for very fast, well-armed vehicles. Though equipped with turrets (unlike most self-propelled anti-tank guns of the day), the typical American design was more heavily gunned, but more lightly armored, and thus more maneuverable, than a contemporary tank. The idea was to use speed and agility as a defense, rather than thick armor, to bring a powerful self-propelled gun into action against enemy tanks.

This doctrine failed on the European battlefield where attacking American tanks ran into defending German tanks and self-propelled guns far more often than intended, and the tank destroyers were called in to assist. Tank destroyers were often deployed to attack enemy armor at long range from an ambush position. During the battle for Italy, tank destroyers compensated for a shortage of 155 mm artillery ammunition by using their 3-inch or 76 mm guns in indirect fire role[dubious – discuss]. Near the end of the war, there were so few German tanks that tank destroyers were increasingly used as self-propelled artillery in support of infantry for lack of any other targets. In effect, they were used exactly like tanks.

In practice, tank destroyer battalions were not held in reserve but were attached nearly permanently to divisions. Tank destroyer battalions assigned to divisions were often split up, with tank destroyer companies attached to infantry regiments, or platoons attached to infantry battalions. When so attached, defending tank destroyer units supplemented organic antitank weapons (bazookas and 57mm towed guns).[30]

Mobility

While the M18 was capable of high road speeds, this attribute was difficult to use successfully in combat.[28]

Although sustained travel at road speeds was hardly ever used outside of the Allied response during the Battle of the Bulge,[28] most Hellcat crews found the higher speeds especially useful in a sprint to flank German tanks, which had relatively slow turret traverse speeds, and such maneuvering allowed the tank destroyer crew to direct a shot into the enemy's thinner side or rear armor. The open-top proved an advantage in terms of allowing the TD crews significantly better visibility than their opponents, many of which were German tank destroyers that did not have revolving turrets and were handicapped by poor lateral visibility.

In general, Hellcat crews were complimentary of their vehicle's performance and capabilities but did complain that the open-top created a cold interior in the Northern European winter of 1944–45.[28] This problem was exacerbated because the air-cooled engine pulled a percentage of its cooling air through the crew compartment, creating, in effect, a large armor-plated refrigerator. It was not designed to do so, but it proved impossible to seal off the crew compartment entirely from engine induced drafts.

Post war

After World War II, many M18s were sold to other countries. These were rebuilt and refurbished by Brown & Root in northern Italy in the late 1940s and early 1950s, and bear data plates that indicate those rebuilds. One of the users was Yugoslavia, which received 260 Hellcats during the Informbiro period[31] and kept some of them in reserve until the early 1990s. A number of these vehicles were later used by the Military of Serbian Krajina and Army of Republika Srpska during the Yugoslav wars. One example was used on an armored train named the "Krajina express" (Krajina Ekspres).[32]

The Military of the Republic of China also operated several M18s until their chassis and hulls were worn out, at which point the turrets were salvaged and installed onto surplus hulls of M42 Duster anti-aircraft vehicles to produce Type 64 light tanks.

The Greek Army received 127 M18s from 1952 till 1954. Initially, these were organized in three Tank Destroyer Regiments numbered 397, 398 and 399. In 1959 the Tank Destroyer Regiments were reorganized in three Tank Destroyer Battalions with the same numbers. Most of the M18s were retired in the end of 60s but a few of them remained in service till the middle 70s for training.[33] The hulls of the M18s were dismantled and the turrets were used as gun emplacements in the northern borders of Greece and the Aegean islands.[34] One M18 is preserved in the Greek Army Tank Museum.[35]

The Venezuelan military still operates M18s, with 75 still in reserve service. An unknown number of these vehicles were modernized by a Yugoslavian firm in 1991.[citation needed]

M18 Hellcat "Amaz N Grace" is on loan to the Museum of American Armor in Old Bethpage, New York, from the US Military Museum. An M18 is on display at the Army Heritage and Education Center in Carlisle, Pennsylvania.

M39 Armored Utility Vehicle

Armored Utility Vehicle M39 in Korea, 1952

The only M18 variant produced in significant numbers was the M39 Armored Utility Vehicle, a turretless variation used to transport personnel or cargo or as a gun tractor. This version was armed with a single M2 machine gun on a flexible mount. Some 650 early production M18s were converted into M39s by removing the turret and fitting seats for up to eight men in the open fighting space.[36] M39s saw combat during the Korean War, primarily as armored personnel and munitions carriers and were finally declared obsolete on February 14, 1957.[37] About 100 M39s were transferred to the West German Bundeswehr in 1956, where they were used to train the reestablished Panzergrenadier armored infantry units.[38]

Variants

  • T41 Prime Mover One Hellcat with its turret removed and internal changes made, converted into a prime mover for the 3-inch Gun M5.
  • T41E1 Command and Reconnaissance Vehicle: One Hellcat with its turret removed and internal changes made, meant as a replacement for the M20 Armored Utility Car in tank destroyer battalions. The command and reconnaissance vehicle configuration was found to be superior, and it was decided to use it for both the T41 and T41E1. Ten prototypes, in a program consolidated as T41, were built
  • M39 Armored Utility Vehicle A standardized T41; 640 converted from October 1944 to March 1945
  • 105 mm Howitzer Motor Carriage T88: M18 with the 76 mm gun replaced with a 105 mm T12 howitzer. A pilot was built in 1944 but project cancelled after the end of the war.
  • 90 mm Gun Motor Carriage M18: M18 with the 76 mm gun replaced with a 90 mm gun on a M36 turret; cancelled after the end of the war [39]
  • 76 mm Gun Motor Carriage T86 (Amphibious)
M18 with a much larger and lightweight flotation hull, using its tracks for water propulsion. The T86E1 variant test vehicle used propellers for propulsion.
  • 105 mm Howitzer Motor Carriage T87 (Amphibious)
The T86 vehicles had shown that track propulsion was better and this was used for the T87 which had the same 105 mm T12 howitzer of the T88.

All work on the three amphibious models was canceled after the end of the war.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ the torsion bar suspension was used for two other American tanks of the late-war era, the M24 Light Tank and the M26 Pershing
  1. ^ Zaloga (2004)
  2. ^ http://afvdb.50megs.com/usa/m18hellcat.html
  3. ^ Zaloga, Steven J, M18 Hellcat Tank Destroyer 1943–97, p. 14, ISBN 1-84176-687-9
  4. ^ "4: M18 Hellcat". Tank Overhaul. Series 1. 13 August 2008. Military Channel.
  5. ^ Patton's Vanguard: The United States Army Fourth Armored Division, By Don M. Fox. P.25
  6. ^ Zaloga 2004, p. 5
  7. ^ Zaloga 2002, p. 13
  8. ^ Zaloga 2002, p. 19
  9. ^ Hunnicutt 1992, p. 298
  10. ^ a b Chamberlain & Ellis (1969) p147
  11. ^ Don M. Fox Patton's Vanguard: The United States Army Fourth Armored Division p.26
  12. ^ Zaloga, Steven (2008). Armored Thunderbolt. Stackpole. p. 194.
  13. ^ Jentz, Thomas (1995). Germany's Panther Tank. Schiffer. p. 127.
  14. ^ Weapons of the Tankers By Harry Yeide. P61.
  15. ^ Bird, Lorrin; Livingston, Robert (2001). WW II Ballistics: Armor and Gunnery. Overmatch. p. 63.
  16. ^ Zaloga 2004, p. 12
  17. ^ "Section III-A Ordnance - General Supplies", Quantities of Lend-Lease Shipments, War Department, p. 9, 1946 – via HyperWar Foundation
  18. ^ Doyle (2012) p36
  19. ^ a b Doyle (2012) p57
  20. ^ a b Zaloga (2004) p44
  21. ^ a b Doyle (2012) p22
  22. ^ Zaloga (2004) p12
  23. ^ Zaloga 2004 p34
  24. ^ Zaloga 2004 p36
  25. ^ Zaloga 2004 p37
  26. ^ "Tank Action" by George Forty P195.ISBN 0-7509-0479-8
  27. ^ Military Channel, Tank Overhaul, "The Hellcat", (2006), aired October 5, 2007, 10:00am MDT
  28. ^ a b c d e f g Military Channel, Program "Tank Overhaul" 22:51, Wednesday 13 August 2008 (UTC) "Current hour EDST", mixed documentary with interviews of WW-II veterans.
  29. ^ "M18 Gun Motor Carriage (Hellcat) Tank Destroyer (TD) / Gun Motor Carriage (GMC) - United States". www.militaryfactory.com.
  30. ^ "Tank Tactics: From Normandy to Lorraine" by Roman Jarymowycz, Ch. 5 Creating North American Panzer Armies
  31. ^ Kočevar, Iztok (August 2014). "Micmac à tire-larigot chez Tito: L'arme blindée yougoslave durant la Guerre froide" [The Yugoslav armored arm during the Cold War]. Batailles et Blindés (in French). No. 62. Caraktère. pp. 66–79. ISSN 1765-0828.
  32. ^ Radic, Aleksandar (15 February 2008). "Историја – Крајина експрес". Арсенал magazine (in Serbian) (14): 51–54. Archived from the original on 4 September 2012. Retrieved 20 January 2015.
  33. ^ <Hellenic Army General Staff / Training Directorate (Γενικό Επιτελείο Στρατού / Διεύθυνση Εκπαιδεύσεως), History of Cavalry and Tank Corps (Ιστορία Ιππικού Τεθωρακισμένων), Athens (Αθήνα), 1995
  34. ^ https://grvehicles.wordpress.com/2015/07/06/m18-hellcat/
  35. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2017-09-05. Retrieved 2017-04-15.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  36. ^ Steven J. Zaloga, M18 Hellcat Tank Destroyer 1943–97, pp. 11–12. ISBN 1-84176-687-9
  37. ^ Zaloga p. 43.
  38. ^ Tankograd Militarfahrzeug Spezial No 5002 "Die Anfangsjahre des Heeres 1956–1966 (The Early Years of the Modern German Army)" by Peter Blume PP48-49. No ISBN number
  39. ^ Steven J. Zaloga (20 March 2013). M18 Hellcat Tank Destroyer 1943–97. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 68. ISBN 978-1-4728-0308-5.

References

  • Doyle, David (2012). M18 Hellcat Tank Destroyer Walk Around. Squadron/Signal. ISBN 9780897476980.
  • Zaloga, Steven J (2008). Armored Thunderbolt: The U.S. Army Sherman in World War II. Stackpole Books. ISBN 9780811704243.
  • Zaloga, Steven J (2002). M10 and M36 Tank Destroyers 1942–53. Osprey Publishing (New Vanguard 57). ISBN 1841764698.
  • Zaloga, Steven J (2004), M18 Hellcat Tank Destroyer 1943–97, New Vanguard, Osprey, ISBN 1-84176-687-9
  • TM 9-2800
  • SNL G163
  • TM 9-755
  • TM 9-1725
  • TM 9-1731G
  • TM 9-1750D
  • TM 9-1755A
  • TM 9-1755B
  • TM 9-1826B
  • TM 9-1828A
  • TM 9-1829A
  • Tankdestroyer.net (Web based United States tank destroyer forces information resource) Tankdestroyer.net
Wikimedia Commons has media related to M18 Hellcat.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=M18_Hellcat&oldid=957618222"