AMD K5
General information | |
---|---|
Launched | March 27, 1996 (SSA/5) October 7, 1996 (5k86) |
Performance | |
Max. CPU clock rate | 75 MHz to 133 MHz |
FSB speeds | 50 MHz to 66 MHz |
Cache | |
L1 cache | 8 KB + 16 KB (Data + Instructions) |
Architecture and classification | |
Microarchitecture | K5 |
Instruction set | x86 (IA-32) |
Physical specifications | |
Cores |
|
Sockets | |
Products, models, variants | |
Model |
|
History | |
Predecessor | Am5x86 |
Successor | K6 |
The K5 was AMD's first x86 processor to be developed entirely in-house. Introduced in March 1996, its primary competition was Intel's Pentium microprocessor. The K5 was an ambitious design, closer to a Pentium Pro than a Pentium regarding technical solutions and internal architecture. However, the final product was closer to the Pentium regarding performance, although faster clock for clock compared to the Pentium.
Technical details
The K5 was based upon an internal highly parallel 29k RISC processor architecture with an x86 decoding front-end. The K5 offered good x86 compatibility. All models had 4.3 million transistors, with five integer units that could process instructions out of order and one floating point unit. The branch target buffer was four times the size of the Pentium's and register renaming improved parallel performance of the pipelines.[clarification needed] The chip's speculative execution of instructions reduced pipeline stalls. It had a 16 KB, four-way set associative instruction cache and an 8 KB data cache. The K5 lacked MMX instructions, which Intel started offering in its Pentium MMX processors that were launched in early 1997.
Performance
The K5 project represented an early chance for AMD to take technical leadership from Intel. Although the chip addressed the right design concepts, the actual engineering implementation had its issues. The low clock rates were, in part, due to AMD's limitations as a "cutting edge" manufacturing company at the time, in part due to the design itself (many levels of logic, thus slowing it down). Having a branch prediction unit four times the size of the Pentium, yet reportedly not delivering superior performance is an example of how the actual implementation fell short of the project's goals.[citation needed] Additionally, while the K5's floating point performance was better than that of the Cyrix 6x86[clarification needed], it was weaker than that of the Pentium. Because it was late to market and did not meet performance expectations, the K5 never gained the acceptance among large computer manufacturers that the Am486 and AMD K6 enjoyed.
Models
There were two sets of K5 processors, internally called the SSA/5 and the 5k86, both released with the K5 label. The "SSA/5" line ran from 75 to 100 MHz (5K86 P75 to P100, later K5 PR-75 to PR100); the "5k86" line ran from 90 to 133 MHz. However, AMD used what it called a PR rating, or performance rating, to label the chips according to their equivalence to a Pentium of that clock speed. Thus, a 116 MHz chip from the second line was marketed as the "K5 PR166". Manufacturing delays caused the PR200's arrival to nearly align with the release of K6. Since AMD did not want the two chips competing, the K5-PR200 only arrived in small numbers.
SSA/5
- Sold as 5K86 P75 to P100, later as K5 PR75 to PR100
- 4.3 million Transistors in 500 or 350 nm
- L1-Cache: 8 + 16 KB (Data + Instructions)
- Socket 5 and Socket 7
- VCore: 3.52V
- Front side bus: 50 (PR75), 60 (PR90), 66 MHz (PR100)
- First release: March 27, 1996
- Clockrate: 75, 90, 100 MHz
5k86
- Sold as K5 PR120 to PR166 (PR200)
- 4.3 million Transistors in 350 nm
- L1-Cache: 8 + 16 KB (Data + Instructions)
- Socket 5 and Socket 7
- VCore: 3.52V
- Front side bus: 60 (PR120/150), 66 MHz
- First release: October 7, 1996
- Clockrate: 90 (PR120), 100 (PR133), 105 (PR150), 116.6 (PR166), 133 MHz (PR200)
References
Further reading
- Gwennap, Linley (25 March 1996). "AMD Ships Pentium Competitor". Microprocessor Report.
- Slater, Michael (24 October 1994). "AMD's K5 Designed to Outrun Pentium". Microprocessor Report.
- Slater, Michael (8 May 1995). "AMD K5 Volume Slips into 1996". Microprocessor Report.