Jump to content

A language is a dialect with an army and navy: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

5 August 2024

26 April 2024

11 February 2024

2 October 2023

3 September 2023

6 July 2023

13 May 2023

10 April 2023

9 April 2023

7 April 2023

28 November 2022

27 November 2022

23 August 2022

4 July 2022

10 April 2022

28 January 2022

26 January 2022

29 October 2021

  • curprev 23:1023:10, 29 October 2021Hawkfrost000 talk contribsm 7,378 bytes +1 The page number in the Thomas Burns McArthur text is incorrect. McArthur quotes Randolph Quirk on page 205. https://books.google.ca/books?id=wQucr4-cllwC&pg=PA205&lpg=PA205&dq=thomas+mcarthur+%22language+is+a+dialect+with+an+army+and+a+flag%22&source=bl&ots=9ybqm93KKW&sig=ACfU3U0sNQcQdtbZzgzhRqVkHonPQ7zphQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwibyIzC3fDzAhWhJDQIHbDBAXcQ6AF6BAgfEAM#v=onepage&q=thomas%20mcarthur%20%22language%20is%20a%20dialect%20with%20an%20army%20and%20a%20flag%22&f=false undo
  • curprev 11:3811:38, 29 October 2021190.247.198.100 talk 7,377 bytes 0 →‎Weinreich: wrong transliteration corrected undo

27 September 2021

6 July 2021

29 April 2021

20 March 2021

11 March 2021

27 January 2021

15 January 2021

6 November 2020

20 October 2020

  • curprev 01:0501:05, 20 October 2020Barenchi2 talk contribsm 7,054 bytes −10 →‎Weinreich: I changed "quip" to "aphorism"; the word "arbitrary" to "conventional"; and omitted the word "facetious" as a characterization of the adage. All of the changes help to make the entry more neutral in tone; otherwise, it sounds a lot like Wikipedia does not assess the observation as worthy of serious consideration as a way of understanding how people have distinguished among different languages, especially in the European context. undo Tag: Visual edit

20 September 2020

31 August 2020

27 July 2020

20 June 2020

6 June 2020

  • curprev 15:1715:17, 6 June 2020Pathawi talk contribsm 7,131 bytes −29 →‎Other mentions: Original writer was correct in stating that there was no solid evidence (Laponce attributes this to "la pétite histoire"). I've removed the "citation needed" tag, rephrased the paragraph to make it more clear, & redone the citation to include page no. undo

15 May 2020

24 February 2020

17 February 2020

16 February 2020

8 November 2019

16 September 2019

15 September 2019

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)