An Appetite for Wonder
US edition cover
|12 September 2013 (United Kingdom and United States)|
|Media type||Print (hardcover)|
|Preceded by||The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True|
|Followed by||Brief Candle in the Dark: My Life in Science|
An Appetite for Wonder: The Making of a Scientist is the first volume of the autobiographical memoir by British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins. The hardcover version of the book was published in both the United Kingdom and the United States on 12 September 2013, and covers Dawkins's childhood, youth, studies and early career up to the writing of The Selfish Gene. A second volume, Brief Candle in the Dark: My Life in Science, covering the remaining part of his life, was released in September 2015.
Early reviews were mixed. Marek Kohn of The Independent newspaper described it as warm and generous, while Eric Liebetrau of the Boston Globe  states the book's title is "ultimately a misnomer, as much of the narrative is a slog." The satirical magazine Private Eye describes it as "profoundly irksome...colourless....The self-absorption is extraordinary." Instead of providing a reflective memoir Dawkins "huffs and harangues."  Leah Libresco Sargeant, writing for First Things, finds the book "invites comparisons with C. S. Lewis’ Surprised by Joy. Both are memoirs by thinkers who seemed a little surprised to end up as apologists, much less as writers whom growing numbers would credit with their conversion or de-conversion."
In a review described by theologian Peter Leithart as "the very definition of withering", philosopher John Gray, writing in The New Republic, criticized the book's "tone of indulgent superiority" and "Dawkins' inveterate literal-mindedness," and commented that Dawkins "writes well – fluently, vividly, and at times with considerable power. But the ideas and the arguments that he presents are in no sense novel or original, and he seems unaware of the critiques of positivism that appeared in its Victorian heyday." In his review, which was described by atheist philosopher Stephen Law as "embarrassingly awful", Gray also criticized the frequent self-comparisons Dawkins makes to Darwin, writing "no two minds could be less alike" and that “(Darwin) understood science as an empirical investigation in which truth is never self-evident and theories are always provisional... Dawkins sees science as the triumph of certainty over superstition. But he shows very little interest in asking what scientific knowledge is or how it comes to be possible.”
In The Independent, Brandon Robshaw describes the book as "[...] a generous appreciation and admiration of the qualities of others, as well as a transparent love of life, literature – and science".
Notes and references
- "'Revised title: An Appetite for Wonder". RichardDawkins.net. 9 March 2013. Archived from the original on 13 March 2013. Retrieved 27 March 2013.
- An Appetite for Wonder: The Making of a Scientist. ASIN 0062225790.CS1 maint: ASIN uses ISBN (link)
- Marek Kohn, The Independent - "Book review: An Appetite for Wonder: The Making of a Scientist, By Richard Dawkins", 27 September 2013 Accessed 25 January 2018
- Eric Liebetrau: "‘An Appetite for Wonder’ by Richard Dawkins- Memoir details the early life of an influential atheist" Boston Globe 30 September 2013 Accessed 25 January 2018
- Beyond Belief. Private Eye no.1350. 4 October 2013. p27
- Leah Libresco Sargeant: "Incurious Dawkins A review of Richard Dawkins’ memoir, An Appetite for Wonder.", March 2014, at First Things Accessed 25 January 2018
- Peter Leithart: First Things "Evangelical Atheism", 1 October 2014, at patheos.com/blogs Accessed 25 January 2018
- John Gray The New Republic "The Closed Mind of Richard Dawkins", 3 October 2014 Accessed 25 January 2018
- Law, Stephen (29 December 2015). "John Gray's awful review of Dawkins's "An Appetite for Wonder"". Center for Inquiry. Retrieved 9 June 2019.
Many of Gray’s errors are egregious errors ... Gray is committing a variety of flaming howlers. .., anyone at all familiar with Dawkins’s work should also be able to recognise that Gray is saying things that are untrue. ...yet, for some strange reason, people who should know better have been praising Gray’s review. I encourage them to read it a bit more carefully. Gray’s review is, in reality, embarrassingly awful. Even Dawkins’s critics should be able to recognise that.
- Brandon Robshaw, "Book review: An Appetite For Wonder, by Richard Dawkins. An insight beyond the caricature", The Independent, Saturday 14 September 2013.