Jump to content

Corneal neovascularization

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nizarsaleh (talk | contribs) at 01:36, 20 July 2016 (Combined theory). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Corneal neovascularization
SpecialtyOphthalmology Edit this on Wikidata

Corneal neovascularization is the excessive ingrowth of blood vessels from the limbal vascular plexus into the cornea, caused by deprivation of oxygen from the air.

Cause

One of the most common cause of corneal neovascularization is contact lens wear, especially those made with older hydrogel contact lens materials such as HEMA (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) for both daily and extended wear. Such older hydrogel materials have a relatively low oxygen transmissibility so the cornea ends up being starved of oxygen hence the response of the ingress of blood capillaries into the clear cornea to satisfy that oxygen demand. Also, there has been multiple causes proved to be involved with corneal neovascularization, including herpes simplex and corneal ulcers.[1]

Pathogenesis

Chemical theory

There may be presence of vasostimulatory factor (VSF) or the breakdown (destruction) of previously existing vasoinhibitory factor (VIF).[2]

Mechanical theory

Blood vessels cannot invade normal cornea because of its compactness and loosening of the compactness of corneal tissue due to oedema was mandatory for neovascularization.

Combined theory

Both release of some vasostimulatory factor (VSF) and structural loosening of compact corneal stroma by oedema are necessary for the neovascularization to occur.[3]

Treatment

Modern rigid gas permeable and silicon hydrogel contact lenses have a much higher level of oxygen transmissibility, making them effective alternatives to help prevent corneal neovascularization.

Complications

In advanced stages, corneal neovascularization can threaten eyesight, which is why eye routine (annual) exams are recommended for contact lens patients.

Research

Reduction of neovascularization has been achieved in rats by the topical instillation of commercially available triamcinolone and doxycycline.[4]

Some evidence exists to suggest that the Angiotensin II receptor blocker drug telmisartan will prevent corneal neovascularization.[5]

Recent treatment developments include, topical application of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF.[6]

References

Template:Research help

  1. ^ Abdelfattah, NS; Amgad, M; Zayed, AA; Salem, H; Elkhanany, AE; Hussein, H; Abd El-Baky, N (2015). "Clinical correlates of common corneal neovascular diseases: a literature review". International journal of ophthalmology. 8 (1): 182–93. doi:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.01.32. PMID 25709930.
  2. ^ Abdelfattah NS, Amgad M, Zayed AA, Hussein H, Abd El-Baky N. Molecular underpinnings of corneal angiogenesis: advances over the past decade. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 May 18;9(5):768-79
  3. ^ Abdelfattah NS, Amgad M, Zayed AA. Host immune cellular reactions in corneal neovascularization. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr 18;9(4):625-33.
  4. ^ Riazi-Esfahani, M; Peyman, GA; Aydin, E; Kazi, AA; Kivilcim, M; Sanders, DR (August 2006). "Prevention of corneal neovascularization: evaluation of various commercially available compounds in an experimental rat model". Cornea. 25 (7): 801–5. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000220768.11778.60. PMID 17068457.
  5. ^ Usui, T.; Sugisaki, K.; Iriyama, A.; Yokoo, S.; Yamagami, S.; Nagai, N.; Ishida, S.; Amano, S. (2008). "Inhibition of Corneal Neovascularization by Blocking the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor". Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49 (10): 4370–4376. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0964. PMID 18829859.
  6. ^ Cheng, Sheng-Fu; Dastjerdi, Mohammad H.; Ferrari, Giulio; Okanobo, Andre; Bower, Kraig S.; Ryan, Denise S.; Amparo, Francisco; Stevenson, William; Hamrah, Pedram; Nallasamy, Nambi; Dana, Reza (December 2012). "Short-Term Topical Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Stable Corneal Neovascularization". American Journal of Ophthalmology. 154 (6): 940–948.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2012.06.007.