Declaration of Arbroath
The Declaration of Arbroath is a declaration of Scottish independence, made in 1320. It is in the form of a letter in Latin submitted to Pope John XXII, dated 6 April 1320, intended to confirm Scotland's status as an independent, sovereign state and defending Scotland's right to use military action when unjustly attacked.
Generally believed to have been written in the Arbroath Abbey by Bernard of Kilwinning, then Chancellor of Scotland and Abbot of Arbroath, and sealed by fifty-one magnates and nobles, the letter is the sole survivor of three created at the time. The others were a letter from the King of Scots, Robert I, and a letter from four Scottish bishops which all presumably made similar points.
The Declaration was part of a broader diplomatic campaign which sought to assert Scotland's position as an independent kingdom, rather than being a feudal land controlled by England's Norman kings, as well as lift the excommunication of Robert the Bruce. The Pope had recognised Edward I of England's claim to overlordship of Scotland in 1305 and Bruce was excommunicated by the Pope for murdering John Comyn before the altar in Greyfriars Church in Dumfries in 1306.
The Declaration made a number of rhetorical points: that Scotland had always been independent, indeed for longer than England; that Edward I of England had unjustly attacked Scotland and perpetrated atrocities; that Robert the Bruce had delivered the Scottish nation from this peril; and, most controversially, that the independence of Scotland was the prerogative of the Scottish people, rather than the King of Scots. In fact it stated that the nobility would choose someone else to be king if Bruce proved to be unfit in maintaining Scotland's independence.
Some have interpreted this last point as an early expression of 'popular sovereignty' – that government is contractual and that kings can be chosen by the community rather than by God alone. Modern Scottish nationalists point to the “Declaration" as evidence of the long-term persistence of the Scots as a distinct national community, giving a very early date for the emergence of nationalism. However "the overwhelming majority of academics challenge this vision. Scholars point out that definitions change with time. The meaning ascribed to words similar to nation during the ancient and medieval periods was often quite different than it is today."
It has also been argued that the Declaration was not a statement of popular sovereignty (and that its signatories would have had no such concept) but a statement of royal propaganda supporting Bruce's faction. A justification had to be given for the rejection of King John in whose name William Wallace and Andrew de Moray had rebelled in 1297. The reason given in the Declaration is that Bruce was able to defend Scotland from English aggression whereas, by implication, King John could not.
|“||To this man, in as much as he saved our people, and for upholding our freedom, we are bound by right as much as by his merits, and choose to follow him in all that he does.||”|
Whatever the true motive, the idea of a contract between King and people was advanced to the Pope as a justification for Bruce's coronation whilst John de Balliol still lived in Papal custody.
Who signed it
There are 39 names (eight earls and thirty one barons) at the start of the document, all of whom may have had their seals appended, probably over the space of some weeks and months, with nobles sending in their seals to be used. (On the extant copy of the Declaration there are only 19 seals, and of those 19 people only 12 are named within the document.) It is thought likely that at least 11 more seals than the original 39 might have been appended.) The Declaration was then taken to the papal court at Avignon by Bishop Kininmund, Sir Adam Gordon and Sir Odard de Maubuisson.
The Pope heeded the arguments contained in the Declaration, influenced by the offer of support from the Scots for his long-desired crusade if they no longer had to fear English invasion. He exhorted Edward II in a letter to make peace with the Scots, but the following year was again persuaded by the English to take their side and issued six bulls to that effect. It was only in October 1328, after a short-lived peace treaty between Scotland and England, the Treaty of Edinburgh-Northampton (which renounced all English claims to Scotland and was signed by the new English king, Edward III, on 1 March 1328), that the interdict on Scotland and the excommunication of its king were finally removed.
The original copy of the Declaration that was sent to Avignon is lost. A copy of the Declaration survives among Scotland's state papers, held by the National Archives of Scotland in Edinburgh. The most widely known English language translation was made by Sir James Fergusson, formerly Keeper of the Records of Scotland, from text that he reconstructed using this extant copy and early copies of the original draft. One passage in particular, strongly suggesting Sallust (86–35 BC) as the direct source, is often quoted from the Fergusson translation:
|“||...for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom – for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.||”|
Here are the signatories of the Declaration of Arbroath in 1320. They are an interesting list, although it includes several consistent Bruce loyalists, it includes others who had opposed Bruce, or whom Bruce had tried for plotting against him a few months later, and some shadowy figures of whom little is known.
The declaration itself is written in Latin, it uses the Latin versions of people's titles, and in some cases the spelling of names has changed over the years. This list generally uses the titles of people's Wikipedia biographies.
Duncan, Earl of Fife (changed sides in 1332)
Thomas Randolph, Earl of Moray (important Bruce supporter although briefly fought for the English in the past)
Patrick Dunbar, Earl of March (changed sides a few times)
Malise, Earl of Strathearn (Bruce loyalist)
Malcolm, Earl of Lennox (Bruce loyalist)
William, Earl of Ross (earlier betrayed Bruce's female relatives to the English)
Magnús Jónsson, Earl of Orkney
William de Moravia, Earl of Sutherland
Walter, High Steward of Scotland (Bruce loyalist)
William de Soules, Butler of Scotland (later imprisoned for plotting against Bruce)
Sir James Douglas (leading Bruce loyalist)
David, Lord of Brechin (later executed for plotting against Bruce)
Ingram de Umfraville (fought on the English side at Bannockburn)
John de Menteith, guardian of the earldom of Menteith (earlier betrayed William Wallace to the English)
Alexander Fraser of Touchfraser and Cowie
Gilbert de la Hay, Constable of Scotland (Bruce loyalist)
Robert Keith, Marischal of Scotland (Bruce loyalist)
William Oliphant (briefly fought for the English)
Fergus of Ardrossan
William de Monte Alto
Reginald le Chen
In addition, the names of the following do not appear in the document's text, but their names are written on seal tags and their seals are present:
Alexander de Lamberton (became a supporter of Edward Balliol after the Battle of Dupplin Moor, 1332)
Edward Keith (subsequently Marischal of Scotland; d. 1346)
Arthur Campbell (Bruce loyalist)
Thomas de Menzies (Bruce loyalist)
John de Inchmartin (became a supporter of Edward Balliol after the Battle of Dupplin Moor, 1332; d. after 1334)
Thomas de Morham
US Senate Resolution 155 of 10 November 1997 states that the Declaration of Arbroath, the Scottish Declaration of Independence [sic], was signed on April 6, 1320 and the American Declaration of Independence was modeled on that inspirational document. However, although this influence is accepted by some historians, it is disputed by others. Even advocates of the link concede that it is speculative and not based on any verifiable sources.
- Declaration of independence
- Claim of Right 1989
- List of signatories of the Declaration of Arbroath
- Barons' Letter of 1301, refutation of Papal claim to Scottish suzerainty by English barons
- Scott 1999, p. 196.
- Barrow 1984.
- Lynch 1992.
- McLean 2005, p. 247.
- Mark Bevir, ed. (2010). Encyclopedia of Political Theory. SAGE Publications. p. 921.
- Kellas 1998, p. 35.
- Fugelso, Karl (2007). Memory and medievalism. D.S. Brewer. p. 138. ISBN 978-1-84384-115-9.
- McCracken-Flesher, Caroline (2006). Culture, nation, and the new Scottish parliament. Bucknell University Press. p. 246. ISBN 978-0-8387-5547-1.
- Robert Allan Houston; William Knox; National Museums of Scotland (2001). The new Penguin history of Scotland: from the earliest times to the present day. Allen Lane.[page needed]
- "The seals on the Declaration of Arbroath". National Archives of Scotland. Retrieved 2 September 2011.
- Scott 1999, p. 197.
- Scott 1999, p. 225.
- National Archives of Scotland website feature
- "Declaration of Arbroath - Seals". National Archives of Scotland.
- "Congressional Record Senate Articles". www.congress.gov. Retrieved 2016-01-15.
- Neville, Cynthia (April 2005). "'For Freedom Alone': Review". The Scottish Historical Review. 84.
- Cowan, Edward J. (2014). For Freedom Alone. Birlinn General. ISBN 978-1-78027-256-6.[page needed]
- "Declaration of Arbroath awarded Unesco status". www.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 5 July 2016.
- Barrow, G. W. S. (1984). Robert the Bruce and the Scottish Identity. Saltire Society. ISBN 978-0-85411-027-8.
- Kellas, James G. (1998). The politics of nationalism and ethnicity. Palgrave. ISBN 978-0-312-21553-8.
- Lynch, Michael (1992). Scotland: A New History. Pimlico. ISBN 978-0-7126-9893-1.
- McLean, Iain (2005). State of the Union: Unionism and the Alternatives in the United Kingdom Since 1707. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-925820-8.
- Scott, Ronald McNair (1999). Robert the Bruce: King of Scots. Canongate Books. ISBN 978-0-86241-616-4.
|Wikisource has original text related to this article:|