Draft:Race, Rights, and Rifles: The Origins of the NRA and Contemporary Gun Culture
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
| Author | Alexandra Filindra |
|---|---|
| Original title | Race, Rights, and Rifles: The Origins of the NRA and Contemporary Gun Culture |
| Language | English |
| Series | Chicago Studies in American Politics |
| Subject | Military history, intellectual history, race, and political science |
| Genre | Non-fiction |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press |
Publication date | September 2023 |
| Publication place | United States |
| Pages | 368 |
| ISBN | 9780226828763 |
Race, Rights, and Rifles: The Origins of the NRA and Contemporary Gun Culture is a book by American author and academic Alexandra Filindra.[a] Published in 2023 by the University of Chicago Press, and part of its Chicago Studies in American Politics series,[1] the book explores the historical trajectory of American gun culture, tracing it back to the nation's founding era. Filindra argues that the dominant gun culture in the United States is rooted in ascriptive martial republicanism, a tradition that intertwines classical republican citizen-soldier ideals with American White male supremacy.[2][3][4]
Summary
[edit] | This Summary contains content that is written like an advertisement. (February 2024) |
The book delves into the historical evolution of American gun culture, arguing that the dominant ideology behind it is rooted in "ascriptive martial republicanism". This ideology, linking classical republican citizen-soldier ideals with White male supremacy, shapes a worldview where civic duty is intertwined with bearing arms for the protection of the nation. The book unfolds in three parts: Historical Foundations, exploring early ascriptive republican ideology, its embeddedness in America's military institutions, and the social and cultural transmission of this ideology; The Origins and Worldview of the National Rifle Association (NRA),[5] tracing the emergence of the NRA and its ascriptive republican stance; and Ascriptive Republicanism in Contemporary White Public Opinion, examining the ideology's influence on current gun attitudes and its correlation with anti-democratic beliefs. Filindra methodically weaves through history, organizational history, and contemporary mass political behavior, giving a thorough account of the NRA's role in preserving this ideological tradition.
Author
[edit]In a September 2023 interview with Current Journal, Filindra discussed her motivation for writing the book. She said she was interested in the intersection of contemporary gun culture, race, and political attitudes and noted the discrepancy between the prevailing notion associating gun culture with liberal individualism and her findings that connect it to political duty, negative racial attitudes, and the dominance of White men. Filindra argued that the book offers a new perspective on America's gun culture by integrating military history, intellectual history, race, and political science.[6]
Reviews
[edit]Political scientist Matthew J. Lacombe wrote a review in which he praised the book for its ambitious exploration of the historical roots of American gun culture and its contemporary political implications. Lacombe highlighted and affirmed Filindra's argument that the dominant gun culture in America is linked to ascriptive martial republicanism,[7] intertwining duty, traditional masculinity, and White identity in a local culture focused on armed citizenship. Lacombe noted the debunking of the myth that the NRA was apolitical or supportive of gun control, but he highlighted what he thought as some occasional harsh treatment of the NRA, urging a balanced perspective. Lacombe appreciated the content analyses showing the presence of ascriptive martial republicanism in NRA materials and the exploration of the NRA's "theory of democracy." He also raised questions about the NRA's strategic motivations and its translation of this ideology into political power.
Lacombe wrote:
I applaud Filindra for giving little credence to the commonly asserted myth that the NRA was, for much of its history, apolitical or even genuinely supportive of gun control. While that myth makes for an interesting story, it is just wrong, as Filindra and others have shown. The road to altering what’s considered to be “conventional wisdom” tends to be bumpy and slow, so it is good to see another well-researched account that can help chip away at this misconception.[8]
Kirkus Reviews described the book as an "enlightening, timely study of the evolution of arguments about gun ownership."[9]
Footnotes
[edit]- ^ Filindra teaches Political Science at the University of Illinois Chicago.
References
[edit]- ^ "Book Series: Chicago Studies in American Politics". University of Chicago Press.
- ^ Filindra, Alexandra. Race, Rights, and Rifles: The Origins of the NRA and Contemporary Gun Culture. Chicago Studies in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- ^ "Podcast | Alexandra Filindra, "Race, Rights, and Rifles: The Origins…". New Books Network.
- ^ "Wanting a gun isn't about fear". Think. 2023-11-16.
- ^ "How the National Rifle Association shapes Wisconsin gun culture". WPR. 2023-09-25.
- ^ Petroziello, Rachel (2023-09-29). "The Author's Corner with Alexandra Filindra". Current.
- ^ Filindra, Alexandra (2023-10-23). "The Politics Behind January 6 – Martial Republicanism and White Male Supremacy – Are as Strong as Ever - Bucks County Beacon".
- ^ Lacombe, Matthew J. (2024-01-03). "Review of Race, Rights, and Rifles by Alexandra Filindra". Interest Groups & Advocacy. 13: 69–72. doi:10.1057/s41309-023-00200-8. ISSN 2047-7414. S2CID 266845320.
- ^ RACE, RIGHTS, AND RIFLES | Kirkus Reviews.
