@Seppi333: if you have specific suggestions or criticisms for the draft this is the place to do that. The RfC is to determine which version is better. If you want to edit the draft and make minor changes please go ahead and do that. QuackGuru (talk) 14:49, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@QuackGuru: I'm not following the RfC, but if there is consensus to replace the current article with this draft then please let me know and I'll do a history merge. Please don't cut and paste this draft over the article. I will be miffed if I have to fix this after the fact. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:24, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@QuackGuru: Thanks for the note about the draft. I'm going through it in detail now and I will have suggestions when I'm done. But overall I do think it's a nice improvement over what is in the current article. It wouldn't be fair to make you or the others wait on my feedback. If I can reply here with my edits before the draft goes live, great. Otherwise, I don't mind making my comments in the main talk page after it's live. Cheers, Sarah at PMI (talk) 15:38, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
