This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
I propose to merge Qaunaq_Mikkigak into Qaunak_Mikkigak. I think that the content in the Qaunaq Mikkigak article can easily be explained in the context of Qaunak Mikkigak, and the Qaunak Mikkigak article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Qaunaq Mikkigak will not cause any problems as for as article size is concerned.
Support merger, but with a question. I have noticed these two articles in the past, but at a time when they were written so differently from each other that it was not inherently obvious that they actually referred to the same person rather than two different people with similar names. If we've now established that they are indeed the same person, then the articles should be merged. But, the question is: if "Qaunaq" is the correct and desired spelling that should be retained in the merged article, then why would we merge from Qaunaq to Qaunak instead of vice versa? Bearcat (talk) 17:27, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge (same person) with the better target being that supported by the references: Qaunaq Mikkigak. Klbrain (talk) 14:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}