Draft talk:Vester Guitars

Fair use rationale for Image:Vester.gif

Image:Vester.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

end of the brand

No mention is made of how Vester disappeared. They produced some moderately good copies of Fender instruments with a headstock logo superficially similar to the "Fender" script logo; due to this, Fender was preparing a trademark suit — a tactic that caused IMC's Hondo to rename their "Fame" line — and also planning to claim that "Vester" sounded too close to "Fender." Samuels had already considered that the market segment had become oversaturated by other brands, and the impending suit convinced them to withdraw entirely by 1994.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 04:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)