File talk:Winniethepooh.png

This file is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Disney

This file is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles

Can we find a copy without that glaring white pixel on the mouth? The Wednesday Island 14:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

When the fair use rationale and image template have been removed by vandalism, it seems a little harsh then to mark the page for deletion and remove it from the associated article for "no fair use rationale". Why not just revert the vandalism, back to the previous version? --Old Moonraker (talk) 08:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

Did not see that fair use rationale removal was vandalism. My mistake. Thanks for pointing it out. Fastily (talk) 00:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]