Jump to content

Group C nerve fiber

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Virtualragman (talk | contribs) at 04:10, 15 January 2016 (Spelling of author's name and additional details to enable locating the reference). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Group C nerve fiber
C fiber not labeled, but substantia gelatinosa of Rolando is Rexed lamina II, labeled at upper left.
Anatomical terminology

Group C nerve fibers are one of three classes of nerve fiber in the central nervous system and peripheral nervous system. The C group fibers are unmyelinated and have a small diameter and low conduction velocity. They include Postganglionic fibers in the autonomic nervous system (ANS), and nerve fibers at the dorsal roots (IV fiber). These fibers carry sensory information.

Damage or injury to nerve fibers causes neuropathic pain. Capsaicin activates C fibers Vanilloid receptors, giving chili peppers a hot sensation.

Structure and anatomy

Location

C fibers are one class of nerve fiber found in the nerves of the somatic sensory system.[1] They are afferent fibers, conveying input signals from the periphery to the central nervous system.[2]

Structure

C fibers are unmyelinated unlike most other fibers in the nervous system.[1] This lack of myelination is the cause of their slow conduction velocity, which is on the order of no more than 2 m/s.[1] C fibers are on average 0.2-1.5 μm in diameter.[1]

Remak bundles

C fiber axons are grouped together into what is known as Remak bundles.[3] These occur when an unmyelinated Schwann cell bundles the axons close together by surrounding them.[4] The Schwann cell keeps them from touching each other by squeezing its cytoplasm between the axons.[4] The condition of Remak bundles varies with age.[4] The number of C fiber axons in each Remak bundle varies with location.[3] For example, in a rat model, large bundles of greater than 20 axons are found exiting the L5 dorsal root ganglion, while smaller bundles of average 3 axons are found in distal nerve segments.[3] Multiple neurons contribute axons to the Remak bundle with an average ratio of about 2 axons contributed per bundle.[3] The cross sectional area of a Remak bundle is proportional to the number of axons found inside it.[3] Remak bundles in the distal peripheral nerve are clustered with other Remak bundles.[3] The Remak Schwann cells have been shown to be electrochemically responsive to action potentials of the axons contained within them.[3]

In experiments where nerve injury is caused but nearby C fibers remain intact, increased spontaneous activity in the C fibers is observed.[3] This phenomenon supports the theory that damaged nerve fibers may release factors that alter the function of neighboring undamaged fibers.[3] Study of Remak bundles has important implications in nerve regeneration after sustaining injury.[3] Currently, recovery of distal C fiber function takes months and may still only regain incomplete function.[3] This may result in abnormal sensory function or neuropathic pain.[3] Remak bundles are thought to release certain trophic factors that promote the regeneration of the damaged axons.[3]

Pathway

C fibers synapse to second-order projection neurons in the spinal cord at the upper laminae of the dorsal horn in the substantia gelatinosa.[5] The second-order projection neurons are of the wide dynamic range (WDR) type, which receive input from both nociceptive terminals as well as myelinated A-type fibers.[5] There are three types of second order projection neurons in the spinothalamic tract: wide dynamic range (WDR), high threshold (HT), and low threshold (LT).[6] These classifications are based on their responses to mechanical stimuli.[6] The second-order neurons ascend to the brain stem and thalamus in the ventrolateral, or anterolateral, quadrant of the contralateral half of the spinal cord, forming the spinothalamic tract.[1] The spinothalamic tract is the main pathway associated with pain and temperature perception, which immediately crosses the spinal cord laterally.[1] This crossover feature is clinically important because it allows for identification of the location of injury.

Function

Because of their higher conduction velocity, Aδ fibers are responsible for the sensation of a quick shallow pain that is specific on one area, termed as first pain.[1] They respond to a weaker intensity of stimulus.[1] C fibers respond to stimuli which have stronger intensities and are the ones to account for the slow, but deeper and spread out over an unspecific area, second pain.[1]

C fibers are considered polymodal because they can react to various stimuli. They react to stimuli that are thermal, or mechanical, or chemical in nature.[1] C fibers respond to all kinds of physiological changes in the body.[7] For example, they can respond to hypoxia, hypoglycemia, hypo-osmolarity, the presence of muscle metabolic products, and even light or sensitive touch.[7] C fiber receptors include:

  • C fiber nociceptors
    • responsible for the second, burning pain
  • C fiber warming specific receptors
    • responsible for warmth
  • ultra-slow histamine-selective C fibers
    • responsible for itch
  • tactile C fibers
    • sensual touch
    • includes CT fibres, also known as C low-threshold mechanoreceptors (CLTM), which are unmyelinated afferents found in human hairy skin, and have a low mechanical threshold < 5 milliNewtons. They have moderate adaptation and may exhibit fatigue on repetitive stimulation and "afterdischarges" for several seconds after a stimulus.[8]
  • C mechano- and metabo- receptors in muscles or joints
    • responsible for muscle exercise, burn and cramp[7]

This variation of input signals calls for a variety of cells of the cortex in lamina 1 to have different modality-selectiveness and morphologies.[7] These varying neurons are responsible for the different feelings we perceive in our body and can be classified by their responses to ranges of stimuli.[7] The brain uses the integration of these signals to maintain homeostasis in the body whether it is temperature related or pain related.[7]

Vanilloid receptor

The vanilloid receptor (VR-1, TRPV1) is a receptor that is found on the free nerve endings of both C and Aδ fibers that responds to elevated levels of heat (>43 °C) and the chemical capsaicin.[1] Capsaicin activates C fibers by opening a ligand-gated ion channel and causing an action potential to occur.[1] Because this receptor responds to both capsaicin and heat, chili peppers are sensed as hot.[1] VR-1 is also able to respond to extracellular acidification and can integrate simultaneous exposure to all three sensory stimuli.[9] VR1 is essential for the inflammatory sensitization to noxious thermal stimuli.[9] A second type of receptor, a vanilloid-like receptor (TRPV2,VRL-1), has a higher threshold of activation regarding heat of about 52 °C and also responds to capsaicin and low pH.[1] Both types of receptors are transmembrane receptors that are closed during resting conditions.[1] When open, these receptors allow for an influx of sodium and calcium which initiates an action potential across the fibers.[1] Both receptors are part of a larger family of receptors called transient receptor potential (TRP) receptors.[1] If damage to these heat transducer receptors occurs, the result can be chronic neuropathic pain caused by lowering the heat pain threshold for their phosphorylation.[8][10]

Role in neuropathic pain

Activation of nociceptors is not necessary to cause the sensation of pain.[10] Damage or injury to nerve fibers that normally respond to innocuous stimuli like light touch may lower their activation threshold needed to respond; this change causes the organism to feel intense pain from the lightest of touch.[10] Neuropathic pain syndromes are caused by lesions or diseases of the parts of the nervous system that normally signal pain.[11] There are four main classes:

After a nerve lesion of either C fibers or Aδ fibers, they become abnormally sensitive and cause pathological spontaneous activity.[5] This alteration of normal activity is explained by molecular and cellular changes of the primary afferent nociceptors in response to the nerve damage.[5] The abnormal activity of the damaged nerves is associated with the increased presence of mRNA for voltage-gated sodium channels.[12] Irregular grouping of these channels in sites of the abnormal activity may be responsible for lowering the activation threshold, thus leading to hyperactivity.[12]

Central sensitization

After nerve damage or repeated stimulation, WDR (wide dynamic range) neurons experience a general increase in excitability.[5] This hyper-excitability can be caused by an increased neuronal response to a noxious stimulus (hyperalgesia), a larger neuronal receptive field, or spread of the hyper-excitability to other segments.[5] This condition is maintained by C fibers.[5]

C fibers cause central sensitization of the dorsal horn in the spinal cord in response to their hyperactivity.[5] The mechanism underlying this phenomenon involves the release of glutamate by these pathologically sensitized C fibers.[5] The glutamate interacts with the postsynaptic NMDA receptors, which aids the sensitization of the dorsal horn.[5] Presynaptic neuronal voltage-gated N-calcium channels are largely responsible for the release of this glutamate as well as the neuropeptide, substance P.[5] The expression of presynaptic neuronal voltage-gated N-calcium channels increases after a nerve lesion or repeated stimulation.[5] NMDA receptor activation (by glutamate) enhances postsynaptic Nitric Oxide Synthase. Nitric Oxide is thought to migrate back to the presynaptic membrane to enhance the expression of the voltage-gated N-calcium channels resulting in a pain wind-up phenomenon. This abnormal central sensitization cycle results in increased pain (hyperalgesia) and pain responses from previously non-noxious stimuli evoke a pain response (allodynia).[5]

Central sensitization of the dorsal horn neurons that is evoked from C fiber activity is responsible for temporal summation of “second pain” (TSSP).[13] This event is called ‘windup’ and relies on a frequency greater or equal to 0.33Hz of the stimulus.[13] Windup is associated with chronic pain and central sensitization.[13] This minimum frequency was determined experimentally by comparing healthy patient fMRI’s when subjected to varying frequencies of heat pulses.[13] The fMRI maps show common areas activated by the TSSP responses which include contralateral thalamus (THAL), S1, bilateral S2, anterior and posterior insula (INS), mid-anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and supplemental motor areas (SMA).[13] TSSP events are also associated with other regions of the brain that process functions such as somatosensory processing, pain perception and modulation, cognition, pre-motor activity in the cortex.[13]

Treatment

Currently, the availability of drugs proven to treat neuropathic pain is limited and varies widely from patient to patient.[10] Many developed drugs have either been discovered by accident or by observation.[10] Some past treatments include opiates like poppy extract, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like salicylic acid, and local anesthetics like cocaine.[10] Other recent treatments consist of antidepressants and anticonvulsants, although no substantial research on the actual mechanism of these treatments has been performed.[10] However, patients respond to these treatments differently, possibly because of gender differences or genetic backgrounds.[10] Therefore, researchers have come to realize that no one drug or one class of drugs will reduce all pain.[10] Research is now focusing on the underlying mechanisms involved in pain perception and how it can go wrong in order to develop an appropriate drug for patients afflicted with neuropathic pain.[10]

Microneurography

Microneurography is a technique using metal electrodes to observe neural traffic of both myelinated and unmyelinated axons in efferent and afferent neurons of the skin and muscle.[14] This technique is particularly important in research involving C fibers.[14] Single action potentials from unmyelinated axons can be observed.[14] Recordings from efferent postganglionic sympathetic C fibers of the muscles and skin yield insights into the neural control of autonomic effector organs like blood vessels and sweat glands.[14] Readings of afferent discharges from C nociceptors identified by marking method have also proved helpful in revealing the mechanisms underlying sensations such as itch.[14]

Unfortunately, interpretation of the microneurographic readings can be difficult because axonal membrane potential can not be determined from this method.[15] A supplemental method used to better understand these readings involves examining recordings of post-spike excitability and shifts in latency; these features are associated with changes in membrane potential of unmyelinated axons like C fibers.[15] Moalem-Taylor et al. experimentally used chemical modulators with known effects on membrane potential to study the post-spike super-excitability of C fibers.[15] The researchers found three resulting events.[15] Chemical medulators can produce a combination of loss of super-excitability along with increased axonal excitability, indicating membrane depolarization.[15] Secondly, membrane hyperpolarization can result from a blockade of axonal hyperpolarization-activated current.[15] Lastly, a non-specific increase in surface charge and a change in the voltage-dependent activation of sodium channels results from the application of calcium.[15]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Purves, Dale; et al. (2004). Neuroscience. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc. ISBN 0-87893-725-0. {{cite book}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author2= (help)
  2. ^ Craig, AD (Aug 2002). "How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body". Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 3 (8): 655–66. doi:10.1038/nrn894. PMID 12154366.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Murinson, BB; JW Griffin (2004). "C-fiber structure varies with location in peripheral nerve". Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology. 63 (3): 246–254. PMID 15055448.
  4. ^ a b c Fagan, Tom (2003). "Glial Cells Critical for Peripheral Nervous System Health". News from Harvard Medical, Dental and Public Health Schools.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Baron, Ralf (2006). "Mechanisms of Disease: neuropathic pain—a clinical perspective". Nature Clinical Practice Neurology. 2: 95–106. doi:10.1038/ncpneuro0113. ISSN 1745-834X.
  6. ^ a b Chung, J.M.; et al. (1979). "Excitation of primate spinothalamic neurons by cutaneous C-fiber volleys". Journal of Neurophysiology. 42: 1354–1369. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author2= (help)
  7. ^ a b c d e f Craig, AD (2003). "Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body". Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 13 (4): 500–505. doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00090-4. PMID 12965300.
  8. ^ a b Loken, L (2009). "Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans". Nature Neuroscience. 12 (5): 548–549. doi:10.1038/nn.2312. PMID 19363489.
  9. ^ a b Davis, JB; et al. (2000). "Vanilloid receptor-1 is essential for inflammatory thermal hyperalgesia". Nature. 405 (6783): 183–7. doi:10.1038/35012076. PMID 10821274. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author2= (help)
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Scholz, Joachim; Clifford Woolf (2002). "Can we conquer pain?". Nature Neuroscience. 5: 1062–1067. doi:10.1038/nn942. PMID 12403987.
  11. ^ Baron, Ralph; Ogawa, Setsuro; Katz, Joel; Nagai, Hitoshi; Kashiwazaki, Miho; Saeki, Shigeru; Suzuki, Hajime (2000). "Peripheral neuropathic pain: from mechanisms to symptoms". Clinical Journal of Pain. 16 (2 Suppl): S12–20. doi:10.1097/00002508-200003000-00003. PMID 10870735.
  12. ^ a b Lai, J; Hunter, John C; Porreca, Frank (2003). "The role of voltage-gated sodium channels in neuropathic pain". Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 13 (3): 291–297. doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00074-6.
  13. ^ a b c d e f Staud, Roland; et al. (2007). "Brain activity related to temporal summation of C-fiber evoked pain". Pain. 129 (1–2) (1-2 ed.): 130–142. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.10.010. PMC 1997296. PMID 17156923. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author2= (help)
  14. ^ a b c d e Mano, Tadaaki; et al. (2006). "Microneurography as a tool in clinical neurophysiology to investigate peripheral neural traffic in humans". Clinical Neurophysiology. 117 (11): 2357–2384. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.002. PMID 16904937. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author2= (help)
  15. ^ a b c d e f g Moalem-Taylor, Gila; et al. (2007). "Post-spike excitability indicates changes in membrane potential of isolated c-fibers". Muscle and Nerve. 36 (2): 172–182. doi:10.1002/mus.20793. PMID 17487863. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author2= (help)

See also

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Group_C_nerve_fiber&oldid=699905277"