Noah's Ark: Difference between revisions
ClueBot NG (talk | contribs) m Reverting possible vandalism by 24.38.9.130 to version by Theroadislong. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (1562583) (Bot) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[File:Noahs Ark.jpg|thumb|280px|''Noah's Ark'' (1846), a painting by the American folk painter [[Edward Hicks]]]] |
[[File:Noahs Ark.jpg|thumb|280px|''Noah's Ark'' (1846), a painting by the American folk painter [[Edward Hicks]]]] |
||
'''Noah's Ark''' ({{lang-he|תיבת נח}}; [[Biblical Hebrew]]: ''Teyvat Noaḥ'') is the vessel in the [[Genesis flood narrative]] ([[Book of Genesis|Genesis]] chapters 6–9) by which the [[Patriarchs (Bible)|Patriarch]] [[Noah]] saves himself, his family, and a remnant of all the world's animals when God decides to destroy the world because of mankind's evil deeds.{{sfn|Cotter|2003|p=49}} God gives Noah detailed instructions for building the ark: it is to be of [[gopher wood|''gopher'' wood]], smeared inside and out with pitch, with three decks and internal compartments; it will be 300 [[cubit]]s long, 50 wide, and 30 high; it will have a roof "finished to a cubit upward", and an entrance on the side.{{sfn|Hamilton|1990|p=279}} [[Ussher chronology]] used Bible genealogy to calculate that Noah would have lived about 2230 BCE. |
'''Noah's Ark''' ({{lang-he|תיבת נח}}; [[Biblical Hebrew]]: ''Teyvat Noaḥ'') is the vessel in the [[Genesis flood narrative]] ([[Book of Genesis|Genesis]] chapters 6–9) by which the [[Patriarchs (Bible)|Patriarch]] [[Noah]] saves himself, his family, and a remnant of all the world's animals when God decides to destroy the world because of mankind's evil deeds.{{sfn|Cotter|2003|p=49}} God gives Noah detailed instructions for building the ark: it is to be of [[gopher wood|''gopher'' wood]], smeared inside and out with pitch, with three decks and internal compartments; it will be 300 [[cubit]]s long, 50 wide, and 30 high; it will have a roof "finished to a cubit upward", and an entrance on the side.{{sfn|Hamilton|1990|p=279}} [[Ussher chronology]] used Bible genealogy to calculate that Noah would have lived about 2230 BCE. '''NOAH HAS A REALLY BIG SHLONG''' |
||
==Origins== |
==Origins== |
Revision as of 16:15, 19 March 2013
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Noahs_Ark.jpg/280px-Noahs_Ark.jpg)
Noah's Ark (Hebrew: תיבת נח; Biblical Hebrew: Teyvat Noaḥ) is the vessel in the Genesis flood narrative (Genesis chapters 6–9) by which the Patriarch Noah saves himself, his family, and a remnant of all the world's animals when God decides to destroy the world because of mankind's evil deeds.[1] God gives Noah detailed instructions for building the ark: it is to be of gopher wood, smeared inside and out with pitch, with three decks and internal compartments; it will be 300 cubits long, 50 wide, and 30 high; it will have a roof "finished to a cubit upward", and an entrance on the side.[2] Ussher chronology used Bible genealogy to calculate that Noah would have lived about 2230 BCE. NOAH HAS A REALLY BIG SHLONG
Origins
The Hebrew word for the ark is teba, which occurs only twice in the Bible, here and in the Book of Exodus, where it is used for the basket in which the infant Moses is placed by his mother. (The word for the ark of the covenant is quite different in Hebrew). In both cases, therefore, teba has a connection with salvation from waters. It is made of "gopher" wood, a word appears only here in the entire Bible, and is divided into qinnim, a word which always refers to birds' nests elsewhere, leading some scholars to amend this to qanim, reeds, the material used for the boat of Atrahasis, the Babylonian flood-hero. Noah is instructed to kapar (smear) the ark with koper (pitch): in Hebrew the first of these words is a verb formed from the second, and this is the only place in the Bible where "koper" means "pitch". God spells out to Noah the dimensions of the ark, 300 cubits by 50 by 30, approximately 137 by 23 by 14 meters (440 feet long, 73 feet wide, and 43 feet high), with three internal divisions (which are not actually called "decks", although presumably this is what is intended), a door in the side, and a sohar, which may be either a roof or a skylight.[3]
The story of the flood is closely connected with the story of the creation, a cycle of creation, un-creation, and re-creation, in which the ark plays a pivotal role.[4] The universe as conceived by the ancient Hebrews was made up of a flat disk-shaped habitable earth with the heavens above and Sheol, the underworld of the dead, below.[5] These three were surrounded by a watery "ocean" of chaos, protected by the firmament, a transparent but solid dome resting on the mountains which ringed the earth.[5] Noah's three-deck ark represents this three-level Hebrew cosmos in miniature: the heavens, the earth, and the waters beneath.[6] In Genesis 1, God created the three-level world as a space in the midst of the waters for mankind; in Genesis 6-8 (the flood story) he fills that space with waters again, saving only Noah, his family and the animals with him in the ark.[4]
The parallels – both similarities and differences – between Noah's ship and that of the Babylonian flood hero Atrahasis have often been noted. Noah's is a rectangle, while Atrahasis was instructed to build his in the form of a cube; Atrahasis has seven decks with nine compartments on each level, Noah has three decks, but is not given any instructions on the number of compartments.[7] The word used for "pitch" is not the normal Hebrew word but is closely related to the word used in the Babylonian story.[8]
Traditions
Rabbinic Judaism
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/92/Franz%C3%B6sischer_Meister_um_1675_001.jpg/200px-Franz%C3%B6sischer_Meister_um_1675_001.jpg)
"Rabbinic Judaism" is the Judaism of the first millennium CE, beginning approximately with the 2nd century
Talmudic tractates Sanhedrin, Avodah Zarah and Zevahim relate that, while Noah was building the ark, he attempted to warn his neighbors of the coming deluge, but was ignored or mocked. In order to protect Noah and his family, God placed lions and other ferocious animals to guard them from the wicked who tried to stop them from entering the ark. According to one Midrash, it was God, or the angels, who gathered the animals to the ark, together with their food. As there had been no need to distinguish between clean and unclean animals before this time, the clean animals made themselves known by kneeling before Noah as they entered the ark. A differing opinion said that the ark itself distinguished clean animals from unclean, admitting seven pairs each of the former and one pair each of the latter.
According to Sanhedrin 108B, Noah was engaged both day and night in feeding and caring for the animals, and did not sleep for the entire year aboard the ark.[9] The animals were the best of their species, and so behaved with utmost goodness. They abstained from procreation, so that the number of creatures that disembarked was exactly equal to the number that embarked. The raven created problems, refusing to leave the ark when Noah sent it forth and accusing the patriarch of wishing to destroy its race, but as the commentators pointed out, God wished to save the raven, for its descendants were destined to feed the prophet Elijah.
According to one tradition, refuse was stored on the lowest of the ark's three decks, humans and clean beasts on the second, and the unclean animals and birds on the top; a differing interpretation described the refuse as being stored on the utmost deck, from where it was shoveled into the sea through a trapdoor. Precious stones, said to be as bright as the noon sun, provided light, and God ensured that food remained fresh.[10][11][12] Some more unorthodox interpretations of the ark narrative also surfaced: the 12th-century Jewish commentator Abraham ibn Ezra interpreted the ark as being a vessel that remained underwater for 40 days, after which it floated to the surface.[13]
Christianity
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/46/Nuremberg_chronicles_f_11r_1.png/200px-Nuremberg_chronicles_f_11r_1.png)
Interpretations of the ark narrative played an important role in early Christian doctrine. St. Hippolytus of Rome (d. 235) sought to demonstrate that "the Ark was a symbol of the Christ who was expected", stating that the vessel had its door on the east side – the direction from which Christ would appear at the Second Coming – and that the bones of Adam were brought aboard, together with gold, frankincense and myrrh (the symbols of the Nativity of Christ). Hippolytus furthermore stated that the ark floated to and fro in the four directions on the waters, making the sign of the cross, before eventually landing on Mount Kardu "in the east, in the land of the sons of Raban, and the Orientals call it Mount Godash; the Armenians call it Ararat".[14] On a more practical plane, Hippolytus explained that the lowest of the three decks was for wild beasts, the middle for birds and domestic animals, and the top level for humans, and that male animals were separated from the females by sharp stakes so that there would be no breeding on board.[14]
The early Church Father and theologian Origen (c. 182 – 251) produced a learned argument about cubits, in response to a critic who doubted that the ark could contain all the animals in the world. Origen held that Moses, the traditional author of the book of Genesis, had been brought up in Egypt and would therefore have used the larger Egyptian cubit. He also fixed the shape of the ark as a truncated pyramid, square at its base, and tapering to a square peak one cubit on a side; it was not until the 12th century that it came to be thought of as a rectangular box with a sloping roof.[15]
Early Christian artists depicted Noah standing in a small box on the waves, symbolizing God saving the Christian Church in its turbulent early years. St. Augustine of Hippo (354–430), in his work City of God, demonstrated that the dimensions of the ark corresponded to the dimensions of the human body, which according to Christian doctrine is the body of Christ, and in turn the body of the Church.[16] St. Jerome (c. 347 – 420) identified the raven, which was sent forth and did not return, as the "foul bird of wickedness" expelled by baptism;[17] more enduringly, the dove and olive branch came to symbolize the Holy Spirit and the hope of salvation and, eventually, peace.[15] The olive branch remains a secular and religious symbol of peace today.
Islam
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/86/16_2-8-2005-Noahs-ark-Hafis-Abru-2.jpg/220px-16_2-8-2005-Noahs-ark-Hafis-Abru-2.jpg)
In contrast to the Jewish tradition, which uses a term which can be translated as a "box" or "chest" to describe the Ark, surah 29:14 of the Quran refers to it as a safina, an ordinary ship, and surah 54:13 describes the ark as "a thing of boards and nails". `Abd Allah ibn `Abbas, a contemporary of Muhammad, wrote that Noah was in doubt as to what shape to make the ark, and that Allah revealed to him that it was to be shaped like a bird's belly and fashioned of teak wood.[18]
Abdallah ibn 'Umar al-Baidawi, writing in the 13th century, explains that in the first of its three levels wild and domesticated animals were lodged, in the second the human beings, and in the third the birds. On every plank was the name of a prophet. Three missing planks, symbolizing three prophets, were brought from Egypt by Og, son of Anak, the only one of the giants permitted to survive the Flood. The body of Adam was carried in the middle to divide the men from the women. Surah 11:41 says: "And he said, 'Ride ye in it; in the Name of Allah it moves and stays!'"; this was taken to mean that Noah said, "In the Name of Allah!" when he wished the ark to move, and the same when he wished it to stand still.
Noah spent five or six months aboard the ark, at the end of which he sent out a raven. But the raven stopped to feast on carrion, and so Noah cursed it and sent out the dove, which has been known ever since as the friend of mankind. The medieval scholar Abu al-Hasan Ali ibn al-Husayn Masudi (d. 956) wrote that Allah commanded the Earth to absorb the water, and certain portions which were slow in obeying received salt water in punishment and so became dry and arid. The water which was not absorbed formed the seas, so that the waters of the flood still exist. Masudi says that the ark began its voyage at Kufa in central Iraq and sailed to Mecca, circling the Kaaba before finally traveling to Mount Judi, which surah 11:44 states was its final resting place. This mountain is identified by tradition with a hill near the town of Jazirat ibn Umar on the east bank of the Tigris in the province of Mosul in northern Iraq, and Masudi says that the spot could be seen in his time.[10] [11]
Other traditions
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/27/Cole_Thomas_The_Subsiding_of_the_Waters_of_the_Deluge_1829.jpg/200px-Cole_Thomas_The_Subsiding_of_the_Waters_of_the_Deluge_1829.jpg)
The Mandaeans of the southern Iraqi marshes regard Noah as a prophet, while rejecting both Abraham and Jesus as false prophets. In the Mandaean scriptures, the ark was built of sandalwood from Jebel Harun and was cubic in shape, with a length, width and height of 30 amma (the length of an arm); its final resting place is said to be Egypt.[citation needed]
The Bahá'í Faith regards the Ark and the Flood as symbolic.[19] In Bahá'í belief, only Noah's followers were spiritually alive, preserved in the "ark" of his teachings, as others were spiritually dead.[20][21] The Bahá'í scripture Kitáb-i-Íqán endorses the Islamic belief that Noah had a large number of companions on the ark, either 40 or 72, as well as his family, and that he taught for 950 (symbolic) years before the flood.[22]
Historicity
Ark's geometrics
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/30/Allessandro_Masnago_-_Cameo_with_Noah%27s_Ark_-_Walters_421447.jpg/220px-Allessandro_Masnago_-_Cameo_with_Noah%27s_Ark_-_Walters_421447.jpg)
In Europe, the Renaissance saw much speculation on the nature of the ark that might have seemed familiar to early theologians such as Origen and Augustine. At the same time, however, a new class of scholarship arose, one which, while never questioning the literal truth of the Ark story, began to speculate on the practical workings of Noah's vessel from within a purely naturalistic framework. In the 15th century, Alfonso Tostada gave a detailed account of the logistics of the ark, down to arrangements for the disposal of dung and the circulation of fresh air. The 16th-century geometrician Johannes Buteo calculated the ship's internal dimensions, allowing room for Noah's grinding mills and smokeless ovens, a model widely adopted by other commentators.[15]
Various editions of the Encyclopædia Britannica reflect the collapse of belief in the historicity of the ark in the face of advancing scientific knowledge. Its 1771 edition offered the following as scientific evidence for the ark's size and capacity: "...Buteo and Kircher have proved geometrically, that, taking the common cubit as a foot and a half, the ark was abundantly sufficient for all the animals supposed to be lodged in it...the number of species of animals will be found much less than is generally imagined, not amounting to a hundred species of quadrupeds". By the eighth edition (1853–1860), the encyclopedia said of the Noah story, "The insuperable difficulties connected with the belief that all other existing species of animals were provided for in the ark are obviated by adopting the suggestion of Bishop Stillingfleet, approved by Matthew Poole...and others, that the Deluge did not extend beyond the region of the Earth then inhabited". By the ninth edition, in 1875, no attempt was made to reconcile the Noah story with scientific fact, and it was presented without comment. In the 1960 edition, the article on the ark stated that "Before the days of 'higher criticism' and the rise of the modern scientific views as to the origin of the species, there was much discussion among the learned, and many ingenious and curious theories were advanced, as to the number of animals on the ark".[24]
Species distribution
By the 17th century, it was becoming necessary to reconcile the exploration of the New World and increased awareness of the global distribution of species with the older belief that all life had sprung from a single point of origin on the slopes of Mount Ararat. The obvious answer was that man had spread over the continents following the destruction of the Tower of Babel and taken animals with him, yet some of the results seemed peculiar. In 1646, Sir Thomas Browne wondered why the natives of North America had taken rattlesnakes with them, but not horses: "How America abounded with Beasts of prey and noxious Animals, yet contained not in that necessary Creature, a Horse, is very strange".[15]
Browne, who was among the first to question the notion of spontaneous generation, was a medical doctor and amateur scientist making this observation in passing. However, biblical scholars of the time, such as Justus Lipsius (1547–1606) and Athanasius Kircher (c.1601–80), were also beginning to subject the Ark story to rigorous scrutiny as they attempted to harmonize the biblical account with the growing body of natural historical knowledge. The resulting hypotheses were an important impetus to the study of the geographical distribution of plants and animals, and indirectly spurred the emergence of biogeography in the 18th century. Natural historians began to draw connections between climates and the animals and plants adapted to them. One influential theory held that the biblical Ararat was striped with varying climatic zones, and as climate changed, the associated animals moved as well, eventually spreading to repopulate the globe.
There was also the problem of an ever-expanding number of known species: for Kircher and earlier natural historians, there was little problem finding room for all known animal species in the ark. Less than a century later, discoveries of new species made it increasingly difficult to justify a literal interpretation for the Ark story.[25] By the middle of the 18th century only a few natural historians accepted a literal interpretation of the narrative.[26]
See also
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/4a/Commons-logo.svg/30px-Commons-logo.svg.png)
- Black Sea deluge hypothesis
- Epic of Gilgamesh
- Flood legends#Hypotheses for theories about how the story arose.
- Mount Etna#Geological history about a massive collapse of a side of Mount Etna about 6000 BC, which may have caused a big tsunami in the Mediterranean Sea.
- Johan's Ark, a half-length model of the Ark
- List of world's largest wooden ships
- Noah's Ark (Hong Kong), a full-scale replica of the Ark
- Searches for Noah's Ark
- Noahide laws
- Sons of Noah
- TalkOrigins Archive
- Wives aboard Noah's Ark
- Ziusudra
References
Citations
- ^ Cotter 2003, p. 49.
- ^ Hamilton 1990, p. 279.
- ^ Hamilton 1990, p. 280-282.
- ^ a b Gooder 2005, p. 38.
- ^ a b Knight 1990, p. 175-176.
- ^ Kessler,Deurloo 2004, p. 81.
- ^ Hamilton 1990, p. 282.
- ^ McKeown 2008, p. 55.
- ^ Avigdor Nebenzahl, Tiku Bachodesh Shofer: Thoughts for Rosh Hashanah, Feldheim Publishers, 1997, p.208
- ^ a b McCurdy, J.F.; Bacher, W.; Seligsohn, M.; Hirsch, E.G., eds. (2002). "Noah". Jewish Encyclopedia. JewishEncyclopedia.com.
{{cite book}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); External link in
(help); Invalid|chapterurl=
|ref=harv
(help); Unknown parameter|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b McCurdy, J.F.; Jastrow, M.W.; Ginzberg, L.; McDonald, D.B., eds. (2002). "Ark of Noah". Jewish Encyclopedia. JewishEncyclopedia.com.
{{cite book}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); External link in
(help); Invalid|chapterurl=
|ref=harv
(help); Unknown parameter|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (help) - ^ Hirsch, E.G.; Muss-Arnolt, W.; Hirschfeld, H, eds. (2002). "The Flood". Jewish Encyclopedia. JewishEncyclopedia.com.
{{cite book}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); External link in
(help); Invalid|chapterurl=
|ref=harv
(help); Unknown parameter|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (help) - ^ Ibn Ezra's Commentary to Genesis 7:16. HebrewBooks.org.
- ^ a b Hippolytus. "Fragments from the Scriptural Commentaries of Hippolytus". New Advent. Retrieved 2007-06-27.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|publisher=
- ^ a b c d Cohn 1996
- ^ St. Augustin (1890) [c. 400]. "Chapter 26:That the ark Which Noah Was Ordered to Make Figures In Every Respect Christ and the Church". In Schaff, Philip (ed.). Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. 1. Vol. 2. The Christian Literature Publishing Company.
{{cite book}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); External link in
(help); Invalid|chapterurl=
|ref=harv
(help); Unknown parameter|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|trans_title=
ignored (|trans-title=
suggested) (help) - ^ Jerome (1892) [c. 347–420]. "Letter LXIX. To Oceanus.". In Schaff, P (ed.). Niocene and Post-Niocene Fathers: The Principal Works of St. Jerome. 2. Vol. 6. The Christian Literature Publishing Company.
{{cite book}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); External link in
(help); Invalid|chapterurl=
|ref=harv
(help); Unknown parameter|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (help) - ^ Baring-Gould, Sabine (1884). "Noah". Legends of the patriarchs and prophets and other Old Testament characters from various sources. James B. Millar and Co., New York. p. 113.
{{cite book}}
: External link in
(help); Unknown parameter|chapterurl=
|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (help) - ^ From a letter written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi, October 28, 1949: Bahá'í News, No. 228, February 1950, p. 4. Republished in Compilation 1983, p. 508
- ^ Poirier, Brent. "The Kitab-i-Iqan: The key to unsealing the mysteries of the Holy Bible". Retrieved 2007-06-25.
- ^ Shoghi Effendi (1971). Messages to the Bahá'í World, 1950–1957. Wilmette, Illinois, USA: Bahá'í Publishing Trust. p. 104. ISBN 0-87743-036-5.
- ^ From a letter written on behalf of Shoghi Effendi to an individual believer, November 25, 1950. Published in Compilation 1983, p. 494
- ^ "Cameo with Noah's Ark". The Walters Art Museum.
- ^ All quotations from the article "Ark" in the 1960 Encyclopædia Britannica
- ^ Browne 1983.
- ^ Young 1995, p. History of the Collapse of "Flood Geology" and a Young Earth.
Bibliography
- Cotter, David W (2003). Genesis. Liturgical Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Gooder, Paula (2000). The Pentateuch: a story of beginnings. T&T Clark.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Hamilton, Victor P (1990). The book of Genesis: chapters 1-17. Eerdmans.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Kessler, Martin; Deurloo, Karel Adriaan (2004). A commentary on Genesis: the book of beginnings. Paulist Press.
{{cite book}}
: Text "ref-harv" ignored (help) - Knight, Douglas A (1990). "Cosmology". In Watson E. Mills (General Editor) (ed.). Mercer Dictionary of the Bible. Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press. ISBN 0-86554-402-6.
{{cite book}}
:|editor=
has generic name (help); Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - McKeown, James (2008). Genesis. Two Horizons Old Testament Commentary. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 398. ISBN 0-8028-2705-5.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
Further reading
- Commentaries on Genesis
- Rogerson, John William (1991). Genesis 1-11. T&T Clark.
- Sacks, Robert D (1990). A Commentary on the Book of Genesis. Edwin Mellen.
- Towner, Wayne Sibley (2001). Genesis. Westminster John Knox Press.
- Von Rad, Gerhard (1972). Genesis: A Commentary. Westminster John Knox Press.
- Wenham, Gordon (2003). "Genesis". In James D. G. Dunn, John William Rogerson (ed.). Eerdmans Bible Commentary. Eerdmans.
- Whybray, R.N (2001). "Genesis". In John Barton (ed.). Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Press.
- General
- Aune, David E. (2003). "Cosmology". Westminster Dictionary of the New Testament and Early Christian Literature. Westminster John Knox Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
- Batto, Bernard Frank (1992). Slaying the Dragon: Mythmaking in the Biblical Tradition. Westminster John Knox Press.
- Browne, Janet (1983). The Secular Ark: Studies in the History of Biogeography. New Haven & London: Yale University Press. p. 276. ISBN 0-300-02460-6.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
- Brueggemann, Walter (2002). Reverberations of faith: a theological handbook of Old Testament themes. Westminster John Knox.
- Campbell, Antony F; O'Brien, Mark A (1993). Sources of the Pentateuch: texts, introductions, annotations. Fortress Press.
- Carr, David M (1996). Reading the fractures of Genesis. Westminster John Knox Press.
- Clines, David A (1997). The theme of the Pentateuch. Sheffield Academic Press.
- Cohn, Norman (1996). Noah's Flood: The Genesis Story in Western Thought. New Haven & London: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-06823-9.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
- Davies, G.I (1998). "Introduction to the Pentateuch". In John Barton (ed.). Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Press.
- Kugler, Robert; Hartin, Patrick (2009). The Old Testament between theology and history: a critical survey. Eerdmans.
- Levin, Christoph L (2005). The Old testament: a brief introduction. Princeton University Press.
- Longman, Tremper (2005). How to read Genesis. InterVarsity Press.
- McEntire, Mark (2008). Struggling with God: An Introduction to the Pentateuch. Mercer University Press.
- Ska, Jean-Louis (2006). Introduction to reading the Pentateuch. Eisenbrauns.
- Van Seters, John (1992). Prologue to History: The Yahwist As Historian in Genesis. Westminster John Knox Press.
- Van Seters, John (1998). "The Pentateuch". In Steven L. McKenzie, Matt Patrick Graham (ed.). The Hebrew Bible today: an introduction to critical issues. Westminster John Knox Press.
- Van Seters, John (2004). The Pentateuch: a social-science commentary. Continuum International Publishing Group.
- Walsh, Jerome T (2001). Style and structure in Biblical Hebrew narrative. Liturgical Press.
- Bailey, Lloyd R. (1989). Noah, the Person and the Story. South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press. ISBN 0-87249-637-6.
- Campbell, Antony F; O'Brien, Mark A (1993). Sources of the Pentateuch: texts, introductions, annotations. Fortress Press.
- Best, Robert M. (1999). Noah's Ark and the Ziusudra Epic. Fort Myers, Florida: Enlil Press. ISBN 0-9667840-1-4.
- Compilation (1983). Hornby, Helen (ed.). Lights of Guidance: A Bahá'í Reference File. Bahá'í Publishing Trust, New Delhi, India. ISBN 81-85091-46-3.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Dalrymple, G. Brent (1991). The Age of the Earth. Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-2331-1.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Emerton, J.A. (1988). Joosten, J. (ed.). "An Examination of Some Attempts to Defend the Unity of the Flood Narrative in Genesis: Part II". Vetus Testamentum. XXXVIII (1). International Organization for the Study of the Old Testament.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
- Nicholson, Ernest W (2003). The Pentateuch in the twentieth century: the legacy of Julius Wellhausen. Oxford University Press.
- Plimer, Ian (1994). Telling Lies for God: Reason vs Creationism. Random House Australia. p. 303. ISBN 0-09-182852-X.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
- Speiser, E. A. (1964). Genesis. The Anchor Bible. Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-00854-6.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Tigay, Jeffrey H., (1982). The Evolution of the Gilgamesh Epic. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia. ISBN 0-8122-7805-4.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Van Seters, John (2004). The Pentateuch: a social-science commentary. Continuum International Publishing Group.
- Wenham, Gordon (1994). "The Coherence of the Flood Narrative". In Hess, Richard S.; Tsumura, David Toshio (eds.). I studied inscriptions from before the flood. Sources for Biblical and Theological Study. Vol. 4. Eisenbrauns. p. 480. ISBN 0-931464-88-9.
{{cite book}}
:|format=
requires|url=
(help); External link in
(help); Invalid|chapterurl=
|ref=harv
(help); Unknown parameter|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (help) - Young, Davis A. (1995). The Biblical Flood: A Case Study of the Church's Response to Extrabiblical Evidence. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Pub Co. p. 340. ISBN 0-8028-0719-4.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - Zondervan Illustrated Bible Dictionary, [edited by] J.D. Douglas (2011). ([Rev. ed.] ed.). Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan. ISBN 0310229839.
{{cite book}}
:|first=
has generic name (help); Invalid|ref=harv
(help); Missing or empty|title=
(help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)