Orgasm gap: Revision history

2 April 2024

• curprev 00:4000:40, 2 April 2024‎ Panian513 talk contribs‎ m 44,669 bytes −98‎ Undid revision 1216792251 by 2A00:23C6:FC2A:4B01:F1A6:B163:2746:B6C7 (talk) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 00:3900:39, 2 April 2024‎ 2a00:23c6:fc2a:4b01:f1a6:b163:2746:b6c7 talk‎ 44,767 bytes +98‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

1 April 2024

• curprev 08:5908:59, 1 April 2024‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 44,669 bytes +69‎ Add: bibcode, date. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Articles tagged with the inline citation overkill template from March 2024 | #UCB_Category 16/47 undo

21 March 2024

• curprev 16:2716:27, 21 March 2024‎ GuccizBud talk contribs‎ m 44,600 bytes +138‎ →‎Contributing factors: Copy edit ▸ MTCE tags ▸ Overcitation flagging. The third one in particular is the most extreme and ridiculous one I've seen in over a decade of editing. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit

29 February 2024

• curprev 17:1517:15, 29 February 2024‎ Jarble talk contribs‎ 44,462 bytes +8‎ added Template:Sex undo

3 January 2024

• curprev 23:3723:37, 3 January 2024‎ Autisticeditor 20 talk contribs‎ 44,454 bytes +2‎ tweaked undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

27 December 2023

• curprev 06:1906:19, 27 December 2023‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 44,452 bytes −237‎ Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | #UCB_CommandLine undo

7 November 2023

• curprev 10:3410:34, 7 November 2023‎ Wikipedialuva talk contribs‎ m 44,689 bytes +2‎ →‎Scientific sexism: clean up, typo(s) fixed: et al → et al. (2) undo Tag: AWB

6 November 2023

• curprev 04:2604:26, 6 November 2023‎ Finell talk contribs‎ 44,687 bytes −89‎ →‎top: copy edit undo

25 October 2023

• curprev 12:5612:56, 25 October 2023‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 44,776 bytes +22‎ Alter: title. Add: doi-access, publisher, authors 1-1. Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | #UCB_CommandLine undo

2 October 2023

• curprev 21:3621:36, 2 October 2023‎ Bilorv talk contribs‎ 44,754 bytes −16‎ →‎History of research: false precision (nearest hundred / nearest percent is more meaningful to readers; sample size isn't big enough to conclude to more accuracy) undo
• curprev 19:4819:48, 2 October 2023‎ Londondare talk contribs‎ 44,770 bytes +29‎ Category:Gender equality undo

27 August 2023

• curprev 08:1308:13, 27 August 2023‎ Sandflier talk contribs‎ 44,741 bytes +27‎ added Category:Sex education using HotCat undo

24 August 2023

• curprev 05:1305:13, 24 August 2023‎ Gobonobo talk contribs‎ 44,714 bytes +20‎ added Category:Orgasm using HotCat undo

15 August 2023

• curprev 22:4622:46, 15 August 2023‎ 208.38.246.92 talk‎ 44,694 bytes +1‎ Corrected spelling of author's last name. undo Tag: Visual edit

13 August 2023

• curprev 09:2409:24, 13 August 2023‎ OAbot talk contribs‎ m 44,693 bytes +17‎ Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot. undo

3 July 2023

• curprev 14:0814:08, 3 July 2023‎ JCW-CleanerBot talk contribs‎ m 44,676 bytes −11‎ task, replaced: PLOS One → PLOS ONE (2) undo Tag: AWB

6 June 2023

• curprev 10:4610:46, 6 June 2023‎ Ira Leviton talk contribs‎ m 44,687 bytes −3‎ Fixed a PMC parameter in a citation. Please see Category:CS1 maint: PMC format. undo
• curprev 09:4509:45, 6 June 2023‎ Sophiasgaler talk contribs‎ 44,690 bytes +2,640‎ Added in the influential 2021 study that created new terminology designed to diminish the orgasm gap undo Tag: Visual edit

31 May 2023

• curprev 19:5719:57, 31 May 2023‎ 2601:204:cf80:63f0:1467:8887:597e:b172 talk‎ 42,050 bytes +579‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit

29 January 2023

• curprev 14:2014:20, 29 January 2023‎ OAbot talk contribs‎ m 41,471 bytes +16‎ Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot. undo

29 November 2022

• curprev 19:3019:30, 29 November 2022‎ Hogyn Lleol talk contribs‎ m 41,455 bytes 0‎ →‎Sexual behaviour and reaching orgasm: hyphenated (adjectival) undo
• curprev 19:1219:12, 29 November 2022‎ 82.1.208.224 talk‎ 41,455 bytes 0‎ →‎Scientific sexism: Elisabeth Lloyd is a philosopher of science specialising in philosophy of biology. Even though she has done work at the interface with biology, it is inaccurate to describe her as a "sex and biology researcher". undo

2 November 2022

• curprev 19:5319:53, 2 November 2022‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 41,455 bytes −119‎ Alter: template type. Removed parameters. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by AManWithNoPlan | #UCB_CommandLine undo

1 November 2022

• curprev 16:5416:54, 1 November 2022‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 41,574 bytes +49‎ Alter: issue. Add: pmid, s2cid, pages, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_webform 632/3849 undo

7 October 2022

• curprev 23:0023:00, 7 October 2022‎ Pikachu1938 talk contribs‎ m 41,525 bytes −3‎ No edit summary undo

15 July 2022

• curprev 08:5808:58, 15 July 2022‎ Sign Design XYZ talk contribs‎ 41,528 bytes +1,128‎ Update in section "History of research" undo Tag: Visual edit

3 July 2022

• curprev 23:3023:30, 3 July 2022‎ Peaceray talk contribs‎ 40,400 bytes +150‎ →‎Scientific sexism: Adjusted Lloyd citation to 2005 edition & added link to online source undo

21 June 2022

• curprev 16:4716:47, 21 June 2022‎ Pek~enwiki talk contribs‎ 40,250 bytes +36‎ →‎See also: Added internal link. undo

10 June 2022

• curprev 21:1321:13, 10 June 2022‎ JayBeeEll talk contribs‎ 40,214 bytes −44‎ Undid revision 1089062440 by Rjen1001 (talk) "men's willingness" = "how willing men are"; your rewording adds a whole bunch of words that just make the sentence harder to navigate for a reader undo Tag: Undo

21 May 2022

• curprev 18:0718:07, 21 May 2022‎ Rjen1001 talk contribs‎ 40,258 bytes +44‎ The statement "men's willingness to perform cunnilingus during relationship sex" is misleading. The sources cited are fine. Both of these studies suggest that men are typically not concerned with women's pleasure in hookups, NOT that they are unwilling to attend to women's pleasure during hookups. There is nothing in those studies to suggest that men are unwilling to perform cunnilingus during casual sex. Thus, both sources originally cited back up this claim. undo Tag: Reverted

26 April 2022

• curprev 06:1606:16, 26 April 2022‎ TylerBurden talk contribs‎ 40,214 bytes +642‎ Undid revision 1084724860 by 155.12.81.81 (talk) Don't see how what you removed is anything like what you described. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 06:0006:00, 26 April 2022‎ 155.12.81.81 talk‎ 39,572 bytes −642‎ →‎History of research: This "article" is full of propagandistic feminazi hate-speech and destorted "research". There's a lot of crap and hate on Wikipedia, but this is one of the worst examples. Just confirming that most women are evil. Thank you. undo Tags: Reverted references removed

18 April 2022

• curprev 18:1018:10, 18 April 2022‎ JayBeeEll talk contribs‎ 40,214 bytes −476‎ →‎History of research: WWN, seriously? This would only be rescuable with a reliable source attributing it to WWN undo

5 April 2022

• curprev 18:1918:19, 5 April 2022‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 40,690 bytes +50‎ Add: pmid, s2cid, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | #UCB_toolbar undo
• curprev 16:5716:57, 5 April 2022‎ Headbomb talk contribs‎ 40,640 bytes +39‎ →‎Sexual behaviour and reaching orgasm: | Alter: journal. Add: s2cid, volume. | Use this tool. Report bugs. | #UCB_Gadget undo

1 April 2022

• curprev 04:0004:00, 1 April 2022‎ Nederlandse Leeuw talk contribs‎ 40,601 bytes −172‎ Valuable contributions, but the last sentence is unsupported. undo

31 March 2022

• curprev 14:0414:04, 31 March 2022‎ MariaWang1 talk contribs‎ m 40,773 bytes +1,508‎ Added a paragraph on future work undo Tag: Visual edit

8 February 2022

• curprev 04:2604:26, 8 February 2022‎ Crossroads talk contribs‎ 39,265 bytes −319‎ Undid revision 1069478918 by Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) I don't agree with this. It should not be presented as though it is all in the past unless sources say it's different now. undo Tag: Undo

2 February 2022

• curprev 14:4014:40, 2 February 2022‎ Nederlandse Leeuw talk contribs‎ 39,584 bytes +79‎ The use of British English throughout this article appears to be pretty consistent, with few exceptions such as quotes from U.S. literature, and words such as 'prioritize'. I recommend we maintain this convention. undo
• curprev 14:3814:38, 2 February 2022‎ Nederlandse Leeuw talk contribs‎ 39,505 bytes +319‎ See Talk:Orgasm gap#Past tense for snapshots. undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 13:4413:44, 2 February 2022‎ Nederlandse Leeuw talk contribs‎ 39,186 bytes +28‎ →‎Sexual behaviour and reaching orgasm: It's in the source text, don't remove it. E.g. p. 7 'Over one-third of participants explicitly stated that sexual reciprocity in committed relationships was important—meaning that both partners should be willing to perform oral sex if that is what their partner wanted (...) most interpreted reciprocity to mean a literally even exchange of sexual acts and orgasms' undo
• curprev 03:3303:33, 2 February 2022‎ Rjen1001 talk contribs‎ 39,158 bytes −10‎ →‎Contributing factors undo
• curprev 03:3203:32, 2 February 2022‎ Rjen1001 talk contribs‎ m 39,168 bytes +6‎ →‎Contributing factors undo
• curprev 03:2603:26, 2 February 2022‎ Rjen1001 talk contribs‎ 39,162 bytes +523‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 03:1003:10, 2 February 2022‎ Rjen1001 talk contribs‎ 38,639 bytes −29‎ →‎Contributing factors undo
• curprev 01:1201:12, 2 February 2022‎ Nederlandse Leeuw talk contribs‎ 38,668 bytes +103‎ Best separated and summarised. undo
• curprev 01:0401:04, 2 February 2022‎ Nederlandse Leeuw talk contribs‎ 38,565 bytes −467‎ Not in citation given / no added value. undo
• curprev 00:4900:49, 2 February 2022‎ Enlightenedstranger0 talk contribs‎ 39,032 bytes −7‎ →‎Sexual behaviour and reaching orgasm: What I changed this to is correct. Say it plainly. undo
• curprev 00:3700:37, 2 February 2022‎ Nederlandse Leeuw talk contribs‎ 39,039 bytes +5,690‎ Sorry, but this is not a proper way of applying [[WP:CITETRIM]. You're breaking citations and removing relevant sources. Let's discuss this on the talk page. I agree that trimming may be a good idea, but this is not the way to do it. undo Tag: Manual revert