Protestant Revolution (Maryland)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Protestant Revolution (Maryland)
Part of Glorious Revolution
Result Catholic Christianity was banned, from the Province of Maryland, until 1776, in the beginning of American Revolution

Maryland Catholics

Maryland proprietary colonial militia

Maryland Puritans

Protestant associators (Puritan volunteer militia)
Commanders and leaders

Baron Baltimore (Benedict Calvert, 4th Baron Baltimore)

Governor Henry Darnall

Governor John Coode

Governor Nehemiah Blakiston
? 700
Casualties and losses
? ?
The 1649 Maryland Toleration Act was passed by the Maryland colonial assembly allowing Catholics freedom of worship in the Protestant majority colony for forty years

The Protestant Revolution of 1689, sometimes called "Coode's Rebellion" after one of its leaders, John Coode, took place in the Province of Maryland when Puritans, by then a substantial majority in the colony, revolted against the proprietary government led by the Roman Catholic Charles Calvert, 3rd Baron Baltimore. The rebellion followed the "Glorious Revolution" in England of 1688, which saw the Protestant Monarchs William III and Mary II, replace the English, Catholic monarch, King James II. The Lords Baltimore lost control of their proprietary colony, and for the next 25 years, Maryland would be ruled directly by the British Crown. The Protestant Revolution also saw the effective end of Maryland's early experiments with religious toleration, as Catholicism was outlawed, and Roman Catholics forbidden from holding public office. Religious toleration would not be restored in Maryland until after the American Revolution.

Events leading to the Protestant Revolution of 1689[edit]

Maryland had long practiced an uneasy form of religious tolerance among different groups of Christians. In 1649, Maryland passed the Maryland Toleration Act, also known as the Act Concerning Religion, a law mandating religious tolerance for trinitarian Christians. Passed on September 21, 1649 by the assembly of the Maryland colony, it was the first law requiring religious tolerance in the British North American colonies. The Calvert family, who had founded Maryland partly as a refuge for English Catholics, sought enactment of the law to protect Catholic settlers and those of other religions that did not conform to the dominant Anglicanism of England and her colonies.

Economic problems[edit]

Charles Calvert's rule as governor was aggravated by growing economic problems. From the 1660s onwards, the price of tobacco, the staple crop of Maryland and its chief source of export income began a long slide, causing economic hardship, especially among the poor.[1] In 1666, neighbouring Virginia proposed a "stint" on tobacco growing—a one-year moratorium that would lower supply and so drive up prices. Calvert initially agreed to this plan, but came to realize that the burden of the stint would fall chiefly upon his poorest subjects, who comprised "the generality of the province". Eventually, he vetoed the bill, much to the disgust of the Virginians,[1] though in the end Nature provided a stint of her own in the form of a hurricane which devastated the 1667 tobacco crop.[1]

Religion problems[edit]

Charles Calvert, 3rd Baron Baltimore, painted by John Closterman.

By the time Charles Calvert became governor, the population of the province had gradually shifted, due to Puritan immigration, becoming, in time, an overwhelmingly Protestant, British colony . Political power, however, tended to remain concentrated in the hands of the largely Roman Catholic elite. In spite of this demographic shift away from Catholicism, Calvert attempted to preserve Maryland's Catholic identity. From 1669-1689, of 27 men who sat on the Governor's Council, just eight were Protestant. Most councillors were Catholics, and many were related by blood or marriage to the Calverts, enjoying political patronage and often lucrative offices such as commands in the militia or sinecures in the Land Office.[2] In response, Maryland Protestants quickly organized, into anti-Catholic militias, known as "associators".

Armed conflict[edit]

Much conflict between Calvert and his subjects turned on the question of how far English law should be applied in Maryland and to what degree the proprietary government might exercise its own prerogative outside of the law. Delegates to the assembly wished to establish the "full force and power" of the law, but Calvert, ever protective of his prerogative, insisted that only he and his councillors might decide where and when English law should apply. Such uncertainty could and did permit the charge of arbitrary government.[1]

Calvert acted in various ways to restrain the influence of the Protestant majority. In 1670, he restricted suffrage to men who owned 50 acres (200,000 m2) or more or held property worth more than 40 pounds.[1] He also restricted election to Maryland's House of Delegates to those who owned at least 1,000 acres (4 km²) of land.[citation needed] In 1676, he directed the voters to return half as many delegates to the assembly, two instead of four. Measures like these might make the assembly easier to manage, but they tended to strain relations between Calvert and his subjects.[1]

In 1655 hostilities erupted once again between Maryland Protestants and the Catholic minority within the colony at the Battle of the Severn, a Puritan victory now present-day Annapolis

Religious conflicts[edit]

In 1675, the elder Lord Baltimore died, and Charles Calvert, now 38 years old, returned to London in order to be elevated to his barony. His political enemies now took the opportunity of his absence to launch a scathing attack on the proprietarial government, publishing a pamphlet in 1676 titled A Complaint from Heaven with a Hue and Crye...out of Maryland and Virginia, listing numerous grievances and in particular complaining of the lack of an established church.[1] Neither was the Church of England happy with Maryland's experiment in religious tolerance. The Anglican minister John Yeo wrote scathingly to the Archbishop of Canterbury, complaining that Maryland was "in a deplorable condition" and had become "a sodom of uncleanliness and a pesthouse of iniquity".[1] This was taken sufficiently seriously in London that the Privy Council directed Calvert to respond to the complaints made against him.[1]

Calvert's response to these challenges was defiant. He hanged two of the would-be rebels and moved to re-assert Maryland's religious diversity. His written response illustrates the difficulties facing his administration; Calvert wrote that Maryland settlers were "Presbyterians, Independents, Anabaptists, and Quakers, those of the Church of England as well as the Romish being the would be a most difficult task to draw such persons to consent unto a Law which shall compel them to maintaine ministers of a contrary perswasion to themselves".[1]

Protestant conspiracies[edit]

Benedict Leonard Calvert, second son of Charles Calvert, who would later become the 4th Baron Baltimore

In 1679 Charles and Jane celebrated a second son, Benedict. But two years later, in 1681, Lord Baltimore once again faced rebellion, led by a former governor of the province Josias Fendall (1657–60) and John Coode (Coode would later lead the successful rebellion of 1689). Fendall was tried, convicted, fined forty thousand pounds of tobacco and exiled, but his co-conspirator Coode successfully escaped retribution.[3]

By this time, the political fabric of the province was starting to tear. The governor of Virginia reported that "Maryland is now in torment...and in great danger of falling in pieces".[4] Relations between the governing council and the assembly grew increasingly poor. Underlying much of the rancour was the continued slide in the price of tobacco, which by the 1680s had fallen 50% in 30 years.[4] In 1681 Baltimore also faced personal tragedy; his eldest son and heir, Cecil, died leaving his second son Benedict as the heir presumptive to the Calvert inheritance.

Border conflict with Pennsylvania[edit]

Adding to his difficulties, Lord Baltimore found himself embroiled in a serious conflict over land boundaries with William Penn, engaging in a dispute over the border between Maryland and Pennsylvania. In 1681 King Charles II had granted Penn a substantial, but rather vague proprietorship to the north of Maryland. Penn, however, began building his capital city south of the 40th Parallel, in Maryland territory. Penn and Calvert met twice to negotiate a settlement, but were unable to reach agreement.[2]

Lord Baltimore's departure for England[edit]

In 1684, Baltimore travelled to England,[5] both to defend himself in the dispute with Penn as well as to answer charges that he favoured Catholics in the colony. He would never return to Maryland.

Calvert left the province in the care of his nephew George Talbot, whom he made acting governor, placing him at the head of the Governor's Council. Unfortunately Talbot proved to be a poor choice, stabbing to death a Royal customs official on board his ship in the Patuxent River, and thereby ensuring that his uncle suffered immediate difficulties on his return to London.[2] Calvert's replacement for Talbot was another Roman Catholic, William Joseph, who would also prove controversial. In November 1688, Joseph set about offending local opinion by lecturing his Maryland subjects on morality, adultery and the divine right of kings, lambasting the colony as "a land full of adulterers".[2]

The Glorious Revolution and English Bill of Rights[edit]

In England, events now began to move decisively against the Calverts and their political interest. In 1688, the country underwent what would later become known as the Glorious Revolution, during which the Catholic King James II of England was deposed and the Protestant monarchs King William and Mary II of England were installed on the throne. This triumph of the Protestant faction would cause Calvert considerable political difficulties. Sensibly, Calvert moved quickly to support the new regime, sending a messenger to Maryland to proclaim the new King and Queen. Unfortunately for Lord Baltimore, the messenger died during the journey, and a second envoy (if one was ever sent - Calvert would later claim that it was) never arrived.[6] While the other colonies in quick succession proclaimed the new sovereigns, Maryland hesitated. The delay was fatal to Baltimore's charter, and in 1691 Maryland became a royal province. Baltimore, however, was still permitted to receive the revenues in the form of quitrents and excises from his sometime colony. Maryland remained a royal colony till 1715, when it passed back into the hands of the Calverts.[7]

1689 Protestant Revolution in Province of Maryland[edit]

Col. Henry Darnall, Deputy Governor of Maryland, was overthrown in 1689.

Meanwhile, Maryland Puritans, by now a substantial majority in the colony, feeding on rumors from England and fearing Popish plots, began to organize rebellion against the proprietary government. Governor Joseph did not improve the situation by refusing to convene the assembly and, ominously, recalling weapons from storage, ostensibly for repair.[6] Protestants, angry at the apparent lack of official support for the new King and Queen, and resentful of the preferment of Catholics like deputy governor and planter Colonel Henry Darnall to official positions of power, began to arm themselves. In the summer of 1689, an army of seven hundred Puritan citizen soldiers, led by Colonel John Coode[8] and known as "Protestant Associators", defeated a proprietarial army, led by the Catholic planter, .[9] Darnall, heavily outnumbered, later wrote: "Wee being in this condition and no hope left of quieting the people thus enraged, to prevent effusion of blood, capitulated and surrendered."[9]

After this" Glorious Protestant Revolution" in Maryland, the victorious Coode and his Puritan allies set up a new government that outlawed Catholicism; Catholics would thereafter be forced to maintain secret chapels in their home in order to celebrate the Mass.[9] In 1704 an Act was passed "to prevent the growth of Popery in this Province", preventing Catholics from holding political office.[9]

John Coode would remain in power until the new royal governor, Nehemiah Blakiston, was appointed on July 27, 1691. Charles Calvert himself would never return to Maryland, and worse, his family's royal charter to the colony was withdrawn in 1689. Henceforth, Maryland would be administered directly by the British monarchy.


The Protestant Revolution ended Maryland's experiment with religious toleration. Religious laws were backed up with harsh sanctions. In the early 18th century Marylanders who "should utter any profane words concerning the Holy Trinity" would find themselves "bored through the tongue and fined twenty pounds" for a first offence.[10] Maryland established the Church of England as its official church in 1702 and explicitly barred Catholics from voting in 1718.[11]

Full religious toleration would not be restored in Maryland until the American Revolution, when Darnall's great-grandson Charles Carroll of Carrollton, arguably the wealthiest Catholic in Maryland, signed the American Declaration of Independence. The United States Constitution would guarantee freedom of worship for all Americans for the first time.

See also[edit]


  • Brugger, Robert J., Maryland, a Middle Temperament 1634-1980 Retrieved November 2012
  • Finkelman, Paul, Maryland Toleration Act. The Encyclopedia of American Civil Liberties. New York: CRC Press (2006). ISBN 0-415-94342-6.
  • Hoffman, Ronald, Princes of Ireland, Planters of Maryland: A Carroll Saga, 1500-1782 Retrieved Jan 24 2010
  • Drolsum, T. Joyner, Unholy Writ: An Infidel's Critique of the Bible Retrieved November 2012
  • Roark, Elisabeth Louise, Artists of Colonial America Retrieved February 22, 2010

Further reading[edit]

  • Antoinette Patricia Sutto Loyal Protestants and Dangerous Papists: Maryland and the Politics of Religion in the English Atlantic,1630-1690, University of Virginia Press, 2015


  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Brugger, p.35 Retrieved July 29, 2010
  2. ^ a b c d Brugger, p.38 Retrieved July 26, 2010
  3. ^ Brugger, p.36 Retrieved July 29, 2010
  4. ^ a b Brugger, p.37 Retrieved July 29, 2010
  5. ^ Hoffman, p.87 Retrieved November 2012
  6. ^ a b Brugger, p.39 Retrieved July 26, 2010
  7. ^ Elson, Henry. "Colonial Maryland". Retrieved 2015-10-13.
  8. ^ The 1689 rebellion, in Maryland was sometimes known as "Coode's Rebellion" after this leader. See Maryland as a proprietary province. Mereness, Newton Dennison. New York, 1901. The Macmillan Company.
  9. ^ a b c d Roarke, p.78 Retrieved February 22, 2010
  10. ^ Drolsum, p.356 Retrieved November 2012
  11. ^ Finkelman