Jump to content

Sodium–sulfur battery

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) at 21:08, 22 May 2018 (Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.6.5)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Cut-away schematic diagram of a sodium–sulfur battery.

A sodium–sulfur battery is a type of molten-salt battery constructed from liquid sodium (Na) and sulfur (S).[1][2] This type of battery has a high energy density, high efficiency of charge/discharge [3] and long cycle life, and is fabricated from inexpensive materials. The operating temperatures of 300 to 350 °C and the highly corrosive nature of the sodium polysulfides, primarily make them suitable for stationary energy storage applications. The cell becomes more economical with increasing size.

Construction

Typical batteries have a solid electrolyte membrane between the anode and cathode, compared with liquid-metal batteries where the anode, the cathode and the membrane are liquids.[2]

The cell is usually made in a cylindrical configuration. The entire cell is enclosed by a steel casing that is protected, usually by chromium and molybdenum, from corrosion on the inside. This outside container serves as the positive electrode, while the liquid sodium serves as the negative electrode. The container is sealed at the top with an airtight alumina lid. An essential part of the cell is the presence of a BASE (beta-alumina solid electrolyte) membrane, which selectively conducts Na+. In commercial applications the cells are arranged in blocks for better heat conservation and are encased in a vacuum-insulated box.

Operation

During the discharge phase, molten elemental sodium at the core serves as the anode, meaning that the Na donates electrons to the external circuit. The sodium is separated by a beta-alumina solid electrolyte (BASE) cylinder from the container of molten sulfur, which is fabricated from an inert metal serving as the cathode. The sulfur is absorbed in a carbon sponge. BASE is a good conductor of sodium ions, but a poor conductor of electrons, and thus avoids self-discharge. When sodium gives off an electron, the Na+ ion migrates to the sulfur container. The electron drives an electric current through the molten sodium to the contact, through the electrical load and back to the sulfur container. Here, another electron reacts with sulfur to form Sn2−, sodium polysulfide. The discharge process can be represented as follows:

2 Na + 4 S → Na2S4 (Ecell ~ 2 V)

As the cell discharges, the sodium level drops. During the charging phase the reverse process takes place. Once running, the heat produced by charging and discharging cycles is sufficient to maintain operating temperatures and usually no external source is required.[4]

Safety

Pure sodium presents a hazard, because it spontaneously burns in contact with air and moisture, thus the system must be protected from water and oxidizing atmospheres.

2011 Tsukuba Plant fire incident

On September 21, 2011, NGK-manufactured NaS batteries for storing electricity installed at the Tsukuba, Japan, plant caught fire. Following the incident, NGK temporarily suspended production of NaS batteries.[5]

Development

United States

Ford Motor Company pioneered the battery in the 1960s to power early-model electric cars.[6]

As of 2009, a lower temperature, solid electrode version was under development in Utah by Ceramatec. They use a NASICON membrane to allow operation at 90 °C with all components remaining solid.[7][8]

In 2014 researchers identified a liquid sodium-cesium alloy that operates at 150 °C and produces 420 milliampere-hours per gram. The material fully coated ("wetted") the electrolyte. After 100 charge/discharge cycles, a test battery maintained about 97% of its initial storage capacity. The lower operating temperature allowed the use of a less-expensive polymer external casing instead of steel, offsetting some of the increased cost associated with using cesium.[9][10]

Japan

The NaS battery was one of four battery types selected as candidates for intensive research by MITI as part of the "Moonlight Project" in 1980. This project sought to develop a durable utility power storage device meeting the criteria shown below in a 10-year project.

  • 1,000 kW class
  • 8 hour charge/8 hour discharge at rated load
  • Efficiency of 70% or better
  • Lifetime of 1,500 cycles or better

The other three were improved lead–acid, redox flow (vanadium type), and zinc-bromide batteries.

A consortium formed by TEPCO (Tokyo Electric Power Co.) and NGK (NGK Insulators Ltd.) declared their interest in researching the NaS battery in 1983, and became the primary drivers behind the development of this type ever since. TEPCO chose the NaS battery because all its component elements (sodium, sulfur and ceramics) are abundant in Japan. The first large-scale field testing took place at TEPCO's Tsunashima substation between 1993 and 1996, using 3 x 2 MW, 6.6 kV battery banks. Based on the findings from this trial, improved battery modules were developed and were made commercially available in 2000. The commercial NaS battery bank offers:[11]

  • Capacity : 25–250 kW per bank
  • Efficiency of 87%
  • Lifetime of 2,500 cycles at 100% depth of discharge (DOD), or 4,500 cycles at 80% DOD

A demonstration project used NaS battery at Japan Wind Development Co.’s Miura Wind Park in Japan.[12]

Japan Wind Development opened a 51 MW wind farm that incorporates a 34 MW sodium sulfur battery system at Futamata in Aomori Prefecture in May 2008.[13]

As of 2007, 165 MW of capacity were installed in Japan. NGK announced in 2008 a plan to expand its NaS factory output from 90 MW a year to 150 MW a year.[14]

In 2010 Xcel Energy announced that it would test a wind farm energy storage battery based on twenty 50 kW sodium–sulfur batteries. The 80 tonne, 2 semi-trailer sized battery is expected to have 7.2 MW·h of capacity at a charge and discharge rate of 1 MW.[15]

In March 2011, Sumitomo Electric Industries and Kyoto University announced that they had developed a low temperature molten sodium ion battery that can output power at under 100 °C. The batteries have double the energy density of Li-ion and considerably lower cost. Sumitomo Electric Industry CEO Masayoshi Matsumoto indicated that the company planned to begin production in 2015. Initial applications are envisaged to be buildings and buses.[16][failed verification]

Challenges

Corrosion of the insulators was found to be a problem in the harsh chemical environment as they gradually became conductive and the self-discharge rate increased. Dendritic-sodium growth can also be a problem.

Applications

Grid and standalone systems

Main article: Grid energy storage
Main article: Stand Alone Power System

NaS batteries can be deployed to support the electric grid, or for stand-alone renewable power[17] applications. In 2010, Presidio, Texas built the world's largest sodium–sulfur battery, which can provide 4 MW of power for up to eight hours when the city's lone line to the Texas power grid goes down.[18] Under some market conditions, NaS batteries provide value via energy arbitrage (charging battery when electricity is abundant/cheap, and discharging into the grid when electricity is more valuable) and voltage regulation.[19] NaS batteries are a possible energy storage technology to support renewable energy generation, specifically wind farms and solar generation plants. In the case of a wind farm, the battery would store energy during times of high wind but low power demand. This stored energy could then be discharged from the batteries during peak load periods. In addition to this power shifting, sodium sulfur batteries could be used to assist in stabilizing the power output of the wind farm during wind fluctuations. These types of batteries present an option for energy storage in locations where other storage options are not feasible. For example, pumped-storage hydroelectricity facilities require significant space and water resources, while compressed air energy storage (CAES) requires some type of geologic feature such as a salt cave.[20]

Space

Because of its high energy density, the NaS battery has been proposed for space applications.[21][22] Sodium sulfur cells can be made space-qualified: in fact a test sodium sulfur cell flew on the Space Shuttle. The NaS flight experiment demonstrated a battery with a specific energy of 150 W·h/kg (3 x nickel–hydrogen battery energy density), operating at 350 °C. It was launched on the STS-87 mission in November 1997, and demonstrated 10 days of experimental operation.[23]

Transport and heavy machinery

The first large-scale use of sodium–sulfur batteries was in the Ford "Ecostar" demonstration vehicle,[24] an electric vehicle prototype in 1991. The high operating temperature of sodium sulfur batteries presented difficulties for electric vehicle use, however. The Ecostar never went into production.

See also

References

  1. ^ Wen, Z.; Hu, Y.; Wu, X.; Han, J.; Gu, Z. (2013). "Main Challenges for High Performance NAS Battery: Materials and Interfaces". Advanced Functional Materials. 23 (8): 1005. doi:10.1002/adfm.201200473.
  2. ^ a b Bland, Eric (2009-03-26). "Pourable batteries could store green power". MSNBC. Discovery News. Retrieved 2010-04-12.
  3. ^ Hameer, S.; Niekerk, J.; et al. (2015). "A review of large-scale electrical energy storage". Int. J. Energy Res. 39: 1179–1195. doi:10.1002/er.3294. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |last3= (help)
  4. ^ Oshima, T.; Kajita, M.; Okuno, A. (2005). "Development of Sodium-Sulfur Batteries". International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology. 1 (3): 269. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7402.2004.tb00179.x.
  5. ^ Q&A Concerning the NAS Battery Fire | NAS Battery Fire Incident and Response | NGK INSULATORS, LTD. Ngk.co.jp. Retrieved on 2014-06-26.
  6. ^ Davidson, Paul (2007-07-05). "New battery packs powerful punch". USA Today{{inconsistent citations}}{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  7. ^ New battery could change world, one house at a time | Ammiraglio61's Blog. Ammiraglio61.wordpress.com (2010-01-15). Retrieved on 2014-06-26.
  8. ^ Ceramatec’s home power storage | The American Ceramic Society. Ceramics.org. Retrieved on 2014-06-26.
  9. ^ Lu, X.; Li, G.; Kim, J. Y.; Mei, D.; Lemmon, J. P.; Sprenkle, V. L.; Liu, J. (2014). "Liquid-metal electrode to enable ultra-low temperature sodium–beta alumina batteries for renewable energy storage". Nature Communications. 5: 4578. Bibcode:2014NatCo...5E4578L. doi:10.1038/ncomms5578. PMID 25081362.
  10. ^ "PNNL: News - 'Wetting' a battery's appetite for renewable energy storage". www.pnnl.gov. August 1, 2014. Retrieved 2016-06-25.
  11. ^ (Japanese). ulvac-uc.co.jp
  12. ^ jfs (2007-09-23). "Japanese Companies Test System to Stabilize Output from Wind Power". Japan for Sustainability. Retrieved 2010-04-12.
  13. ^ "Can Batteries Save Embattled Wind Power?" Archived 2011-09-27 at the Wayback Machine by Hiroki Yomogita 2008
  14. ^ 2008年｜ニュース｜日本ガイシ株式会社 (in Japanese). Ngk.co.jp. 2008-07-28. Archived from the original on 2010-03-23. Retrieved 2010-04-12. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  15. ^ "Xcel Energy to trial wind power storage system". BusinessGreen. 4 Mar 2008. Retrieved 2010-04-12.
  16. ^ "Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. - Press Release (2014) Development of "sEMSA," a New Energy Management System for Business Establishment/Plant Applications". global-sei.com.
  17. ^ "Aquion Energy to build microgrid battery system in Hawaii".
  18. ^ Texas Town Installs a Monster Battery for Backup Power | Popular Science. Popsci.com (2010-07-14). Retrieved on 2014-06-26.
  19. ^ Walawalkar, R.; Apt, J.; Mancini, R. (2007). "Economics of electric energy storage for energy arbitrage and regulation in New York". Energy Policy. 35 (4): 2558. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.005.
  20. ^ Stahlkopf, Karl (June 2006). "Taking Wind Mainstream". IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved 2010-04-12.
  21. ^ Koenig, A. A.; Rasmussen, J. R. (1990). "Development of a high specific power sodium sulfur cell". Proceedings of the 34th International Power Sources Symposium. p. 30. doi:10.1109/IPSS.1990.145783. ISBN 0-87942-604-7.
  22. ^ Auxer, William (June 9–12, 1986). "The PB sodium sulfur cell for satellite battery applications". Proceedings of the International Power Sources Symposium, 32nd, Cherry Hill, NJ. A88-16601 04–44. Pennington, NJ: Electrochemical Society: 49–54. Bibcode:1986poso.symp...49A.
  23. ^ Garner, J. C.; Baker, W. E.; Braun, W.; Kim, J. (31 December 1995). "Sodium Sulfur Battery Cell Space Flight Experiment" – via www.osti.gov. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  24. ^ Cogan, Ron (2007-10-01). "Ford Ecostar EV, Ron Cogan". Greencar.com. Archived from the original on 2008-12-03. Retrieved 2010-04-12. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sodium–sulfur_battery&oldid=842498614"