Jump to content

Spectre (security vulnerability): Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

27 October 2024

23 August 2024

15 August 2024

12 August 2024

9 August 2024

5 July 2024

7 June 2024

25 May 2024

  • curprev 23:5923:59, 25 May 2024 IAmTheSpaghetti talk contribs 84,604 bytes −233 Mechanism: Remove very inaccurate summary. Spectre does not trick a program into accessing memory, and an attacker leveraging Spectre does not read the memory that the victim program accessed. The vulnerability is that details of the CPU's behavior when executing a program are visible to other processes due to side effects, and that information may be enough for an attacker to determine what data the CPU was operating on. This is explained correctly in the subsequent paragraphs. undo
  • curprev 22:1522:15, 25 May 2024 IAmTheSpaghetti talk contribs 84,837 bytes 0 No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

24 May 2024

22 May 2024

21 May 2024

19 May 2024

15 April 2024

12 February 2024

10 February 2024

23 January 2024

19 January 2024

18 January 2024

3 January 2024

30 December 2023

19 December 2023

17 December 2023

1 December 2023

29 October 2023

24 October 2023

5 September 2023

26 August 2023

18 August 2023

3 August 2023

22 July 2023

8 April 2023

27 March 2023

  • curprev 04:4904:49, 27 March 2023 Citation bot talk contribs 71,678 bytes +33 Alter: url, template type. URLs might have been anonymized. Add: eprint, class, s2cid, authors 1-1. Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Whoop whoop pull up | #UCB_webform 526/3352 undo

15 March 2023

  • curprev 14:4014:40, 15 March 2023 Michaelmalak talk contribs 71,645 bytes +2,643 I personally found all that info really interesting. The first of the three already had secondary sources so I left that alone. I moved and contextualized the second and third of the three, while removing promotional language. undo
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)