Jump to content

Talk:The Angry Beavers: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
remove WikiProject Oregon, with rationale
WE CAN SAVE THEM: new section
Tag: repeating characters
Line 79: Line 79:
==WikiProject Oregon==
==WikiProject Oregon==
I'm removing WikiProject Oregon from this article. I can't find any connection to Oregon, except that the word "Beaver" is used. If I'm wrong, feel free to correct me. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 04:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm removing WikiProject Oregon from this article. I can't find any connection to Oregon, except that the word "Beaver" is used. If I'm wrong, feel free to correct me. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 04:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

== WE CAN SAVE THEM ==

Theres a petition on web who tries to get back to the Angry Beavers!!

www.gopetition.com/online/5232.html

SING IT EVERYBODY! WE CAN REVIVEL THEM!!!!!!!!!

Revision as of 00:23, 31 December 2009

Template:Wikiproject Nickelodeon

WikiProject iconTelevision Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Episodes

"No. of episodes: 108": Due to this I had a little email exchange with Micah Wright, where he contradicted: there are only 62 episodes, plus A Tail of Two Rangers/Bye Bye Beavers, giving a total of 63 produced episodes. -- m.

DVD

I've removed the comment that said the show will probabally never come to DVD because of the controversies. Being controversial has never been a reason to stop films & TV series being released on DVD before. The only reason this wouldn't come out is because Nick only seem to release their big money spinners (Spongebob, Rugrats etc...), their cult shows never seeing the light of day.

Its a good thing you did, because it has technically been released on DVD, see the bottom of the page. Im not sure if its a bootleg or not.--Ecwnet 04:58, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Invader Zim has acheived cult status, and they released the entire series on DVD...

NPOV

The final straw was an un-aired episode titled Bye Bye Beavers, which was going to be the show's last episode, involving Norb having to convince Dag that they're just characters on a TV show, thereby indicating a destruction of the fourth wall. Staffer Micah Wright said that Nickelodeon hated this episode, as it made fun of the station's practice of not making new episodes of their Nicktoons, preferring to air reruns instead. It is unclear if it was even part of foreign syndication. Also, the episode had broken Nick's "code on Nicktoons": When you're going off the air, don't tell your viewers! However, Doug did get a series finale.

This part suggests a non-NPOV by the author of the article.

I've found that often history is looked back upon with a factual opinion. Nazis were bad, the Allies were good; the Romans were great, the Germans no more than barbarians. Some are correct, such as the former. Some, like the latter, are far more debatable. But judging from the fact that the paragraph does not misrepresent Nickelodeon's policy, I would say that it is not an unfair assessment, save the last two lines. I am removing them from the main article --The reverend 08:52, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, disney finished the series of doug for them, they only stoped it when they were on hiatus like most of there other cartoons as you can see, rockos modern life legend of the hidden temple amd others didn't really have a divine ending

DvD avaliable at nickclassics.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.91.131.138 (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Debut

I could've sworn the series began before 1997. I seem to recall watching it before Hey Arnold and Catdog debuted. 67.188.172.165 17:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response: Hey Arnold came out in 1996, CatDog came out in 1998.

Address

The beavers address is listed as "RTE 4 BOX 413". Coincidentally the national broadcaster for Ireland is known as RTE with stations RTE 1 and RTE 2 although there is no RTE 4. There is nothing to suggest this is anything more than a coincidental acronym but I make a note of it here anyway in case there is anything more than a coincidenc or any kind of interesting explanation of the address. Horkana

Fair use rationale for Image:TABlogo.JPG

Image:TABlogo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Norbdag.JPG

Image:Norbdag.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A source that could be used: Jerry Beck's Not Just Cartoons: Nicktoons!

I found a book in the bookstore called Not Just Cartoons: Nicktoons! by Jerry Beck. I'm not going to buy it and join the project, but I will ask the other members to get the book so that they can add real world information about various fictional characters.

This makes the creation of separate articles for *many* fictional characters feasible. Having information about the development of the character will make the articles satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) WhisperToMe (talk) 20:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing "The Angry Beavers"

I plan to copyedit this article simply out of pure interest. I loved this show when I was younger and now that I'm an editing student in college, I thought this would be a good place to practice. I'll mainly be looking for errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, etc.Erinrebeccalong (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

bye bye beavers

According to the episode list article, this was released in the UK. Is this true and if it is why is it not mentioned in this article...Paycheckgurl (talk) 01:22, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

American style English?

I changed thr information at the top of the page from " in November 11, 2001" to "on November 11, 2001." However, my edit was reverted. Is in "November 11, 2001" even proper english? I am American, thank you very much, and I never hear about things happening "In" some date. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.48.9.178 (talk) 20:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You changed the spelling from "canceled" to "cancelled". Yngvarr (t) (c) 21:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well what about "canceled in"? Is that also considered American english? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.48.9.178 (talk) 21:25, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's been changed. treelo radda 21:41, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I'm surprised your edit wasn't reverted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.48.9.178 (talk) 01:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Oregon

I'm removing WikiProject Oregon from this article. I can't find any connection to Oregon, except that the word "Beaver" is used. If I'm wrong, feel free to correct me. tedder (talk) 04:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WE CAN SAVE THEM

Theres a petition on web who tries to get back to the Angry Beavers!!

www.gopetition.com/online/5232.html

SING IT EVERYBODY! WE CAN REVIVEL THEM!!!!!!!!!