This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colonialism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ColonialismWikipedia:WikiProject ColonialismTemplate:WikiProject Colonial EmpiresColonialism articles
Shouldn't this article be renamed to the English translation of the formal name of the treaty, "Evian Accords"? Tmangray (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not necessarily, for example Alistair Horne uses Evian Agreements in his book on the Algerian War, A Savage War of Peace. The key thing is what the most common term is in English. Carl Logan (talk) 19:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, not necessarily, but in this instance, Googling turns up five times as many hits on Evian Accords than Evian Agreements, in English. Even the article itself uses that name in the intro. Tmangray (talk) 01:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
