Talk:Other (Lustmord album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:( O T H E R ))

Lustmord is often regarded as the progenitor of dark ambient music, and several of his albums have their own articles on Wiki already. Copyediting is still needed however. C1k3 (talk) 05:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of PROD[edit]

Article needs sources and references, but will remove PROD based upon notability of Lustmord. --OliverTwisted 05:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move[edit]

(cur | prev) 19:46, 25 March 2009‎ Seegoon (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (546 bytes) (0)‎ . . (moved Talk:O T H E R (Lustmord album) to Talk:O T H E R: No need to pre-emptively disambiguate.) (undo | thank)

Requested move 14 January 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was:  Done (non-admin closure)  samee  talk 07:50, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



( O T H E R )Other (Lustmord album) – Not sure how this survived PROD, but anyway if it's staying https://www.amazon.co.uk/Other-Lustmord/dp/B005JT1XGC/ let's have it at a title that looks like the only available English sources, retailers. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:27, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - This is an uncontroversial move though, should have just used Speedy Deletion.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The round braces are there because of the technical restrictions on having titles with square brackets. And the square brackets are part of the title, the way it appears on the album and in the various sources that come up on a google search (other than forums, amazon, ebay and the like). The extra spacing is probably over the top: apparently present in the original album , but seemingly not reproduced in the secondary texts. – Uanfala (talk) 22:43, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy move per WP:MOS/TM, regardless of actual trademark status. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 21:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per MOS:TM. Yes, this could have been speeded via WP:RM/TR.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  20:31, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.