Talk:1% rule

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

On 28 February 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to 1% rule. The result of the discussion was procedural close.

On 1 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from 1% rule (Internet culture) to 1% rule. The result of the discussion was moved.

Reasons that lurkers lurk

This is the 80/20 rule with a different ratio due to accessibility, anonymity. In a real environment where the lurkers actually have to lurk, some percentage contribute to not look like lurkers. BunnyStrider (talk) 22:30, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting Problems

Although I don't have a scientific study/survey at hand, it is my long-term experience that for every one person who reports a problem with a product (software or hardware), 99 others have the problem but don't report it (the equivalent of lurkers).

In the retail world, some of the 99 simply return the product - even though there may be an easy solution - and the others simply throw it away. 162.205.217.211 (talk) 00:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

4% rule

A look at this article's data pages indicates that it was created by 1 person and, over the past 90 days, has been viewed 28 times. Bigturtle (talk) 19:58, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P. Tomi Austin

Looking online, I find no source for this. Everything that comes up when searching for “P. Tomi Austin” or “P. Tomi Austin lurker” is quoting this article (relevant xkcd). It seems made up, maybe? DemonDays64 (talk) 20:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see no mention of that name in the article, so I assume the relevant statement has been removed from the article. V2Blast (talk) 15:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should this be an essay?

There is much essays to find in here, but what if an essay about this is created? 125.167.114.151 (talk) 01:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Social media commentary

I find this to be true of social media commentary as well. It doesnt matter the topic of discussion, only about 1% of comments contribute meaningful content to the discussion. Of the 90% of all others, comments are outdated cliches that have already circulated for years that no one really needs to hear again, brainless automatons interjecting old news and old sentiments without offering solutions or analysis, or moving the conversation forward. Basically meme culture. While the remaining 9% think they are contributing but only restating or reiterating content thats already been stated in a comment thread to which they are responding but didnt bother read. An entire social media thread could be compressed to 1% of its size if all the redundancies, meaninglessness, and common knowledge was removed. 50.34.41.50 (talk) 22:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1% rule and Wikipedia

I think that the statement that the 1-9-10 rule or 1% rule applies to Wikipedia is inaccurate: the Wikimedia Foundation reports that less than 0.05% of visitors are active editors in any given month (rather than 10%), and Wikipedia surveys show that 28% of users state that creating new articles is their primary activity (rather than 10%). @TheConflux: do you have another source? I recognize that the statistics that I found aren't perfect. Thanks, Inverted Hourglass (talk) 16:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the piece of information, didn't realize the Wikimedia Foundation found otherwise. That's surprising to me, but I'm happy to change my mind. TheConflux (talk) 18:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It was surprising to me too, though I imagine that the barrier to entry on Wikipedia is a lot higher than other sites. Inverted Hourglass (talk) 23:28, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 February 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Procedual close. Duplicate RM just below. (closed by non-admin page mover) ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 05:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1% rule (Internet culture) → 1% rule – Seems to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC compared to 1% rule (aviation medicine) PhotographyEdits (talk) 20:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 22:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 1 March 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 21:21, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1% rule (Internet culture) → 1% rule – Seems to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC compared to 1% rule (aviation medicine) PhotographyEdits (talk) 20:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom, there is no question that the Internet rule is the primary topic when pageviews are compared and neither can truly lay claim to longterm significance. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.