Jump to content

Talk:100th United States Congress

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

There is a competing standard on how to title these articles. Should we use the words (One Hundredth) or the numbers (100th)? Chadlupkes 18:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I say numbers. All the .gov sites I saw refer to it as the "100th Government." Bsd987 01:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree and am going to be bold. No reason to have 2. -Jcbarr 04:57, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So how come #1-99 are all spelled out? *Dan T.* 15:41, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
For the sake of consistency, and the fact that it'll take forever to change 1-99, let's have them spelled out in the article summaries while keeping the page names numeric. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwayzer (talkcontribs) 23:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 100th United States Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]