Talk:106 & Park

This page is not a forum for general discussion about 106 & Park or anything not directly related to improving the article. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 106 & Park or anything not directly related to improving the article at the Reference desk.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cite your Source

I have removed the following information from the page...

"But viewer ratings are starting to plummet. According to BET the average BEt 106 and Park new episode airing would hold anywhere from 45,000-123,000 viewers, but since Tigger and Julissa left ratings have averaged 14,000-34,000 viewers. But the ratings of Julissa's show "The Center" have gone up a whopping 5.6%."

Information such as this can not be posted on wikipedia without citation. Please list your source and then repost the information.

Recent top 10 section

someone needs to update that —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pumpkin Pie (talk • contribs).

Recent Countdown section

This is updated daily? That seems too change too often to be of value. The previous versions of the article will have the content, but it won't be too easy to browse. I don't think that the article should grow to keep it for each day either. Any thoughts? --EarthPerson 00:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article 106 & Park Countdowns was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/106 & Park Countdowns. I've removed the section linking to it. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-07 08:37Z

My goodness

Is the 'Freestyle Friday 2001-2007" section that was added even written in english? 207.144.168.175 05:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC) ( User:BMSprint )[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:106parklogoold.gif

Image:106parklogoold.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:12, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:106parkphoneinterview.jpg

Image:106parkphoneinterview.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:13, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Special Editions Section

I deleted the special editions section because it is difficult to keep up with all of the special editions of 106 & Park. In addition, you would also have to keep up with all of the past special editions of the series. Therefore, it was deleted

Hog2 (talk) 11:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dates

should all the dates for when videos chart and premeire for 07 be deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.132.148.119 (talk) 04:59, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No we need to keep it there for the history. Also, because for I Won't Tell premiered in 07 but came on the countdown in 08. So, let's keep it.

-Piazzajordan2

Could someone who knows make it clear on the page when the show actually began broadcasting? that would be a good idea i think

Cheers - Righteho — Preceding unsigned comment added by Righteho11 (talk • contribs) 05:44, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RFC

Should the article include an exhaustive list—dating from Aug 2007 to the present—of every single "New Jam of the Day" (20+ per month) and "New Entry"? —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 09:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. Oh good god no. ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 20:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It absolutely should not. Not only is it unsourced but it clearly violates WP:NOT#IINFO. I've removed it. - eo (talk) 00:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uhhh, ok so now New Joints & New Entries from 106 & Park has been created and everything is moved there. Not exactly what the goal was. - eo (talk) 01:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the New Joints/New Entries page that just got "created"? I really personally feel like it should be placed somewhere on Wikipedia if somebody is willing to kepp up on the updates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.21.22 (talk) 04:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Joints & New Entries from 106 & Park

All of this information has been removed per WP:NOT#IINFO and under the basis that it is not notable and its "source" is a blog (not a reliable source). Further, upon being moved to its own article, it was deleted per consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Joints & New Entries from 106 & Park. Therefore, it should not be continuously readded here. To editors: please stop placing it here. It also does not belong on User Pages or User Talk Pages per WP:User page. Again, please stop re-inserting non-notable info here; continuing to do so at this point will be considered vandalism. - eo (talk) 17:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I KNOW IT TAKES ALOT BUT PLEASE?????

I know it takes a lot of work to keep the top 10 countdown updated, with the new joints and all but please let it be put back on the page. it was a huge help for me to keep me informed on the latest songs and the albums that i must have. it takes work but i'll update everyday if i have to as long as you allow me to put it back up! get back with me as soon as possible please, what can I do to make a difference or change your minds? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelltaylor777777 (talk • contribs) 07:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We can't because they won't let us. :(

--Piazzajordan2 (straight chillin) 07:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.bet.com/OnTV/BETShows/106andpark/106andpark_about_article
- In 106 & Park on 2011-05-23 02:02:10, 404 Not Found
- In 106 & Park on 2011-05-31 22:03:08, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.106andpark.com
- In 106 & Park on 2011-05-23 02:02:16, HTTP Redirect Loop: [1] -> [2] -> [3] -> [4] -> [5]
- In 106 & Park on 2011-05-31 22:03:10, HTTP Redirect Loop: [6] -> [7] -> [8] -> [9] -> [10]

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]