Talk:1928 in film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Favionian keep reverting and she should be banned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1006:B003:A839:C108:7E93:8C2:3BC9 (talk) 10:44, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

STOP REVERTING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well they keep on reverting and they should be stopped.

Why don't you discuss your edits rather than ordering others around. I also strongly suggest you stop reverting and edit warring with others. - SchroCat (talk) 10:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the lead section.

I've fixed the page by adding a lead section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1006:B12F:B3DC:712E:9B47:D121:D549 (talk) 10:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have not "fixed" anything and what you have added does not qualitfy as a lead, even under the most lame-brained definitions we lower ourselvs to. Thanks also for edit warring to the most ridiculous degree imaginable: how many people have you reverted to try and force your own words onto the page. You are guilty of edit warring, of breaching WP:3RR, of not bothering to discuss things in an adult way and of being an utter WP:DICK. Well done. - SchroCat (talk) 10:25, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]