Talk:1999 Scottish Challenge Cup final

1999 Scottish Challenge Cup final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 9, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Football: Scotland Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Scottish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1999 Scottish Challenge Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 20:45, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll give this one a review shortly. Miyagawa (talk) 20:45, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Analysis: The first and the final sentence in the third paragraph are uncited. For the first paragraph, you'll just need to use the RSSSF source for the results of the cup.

Citations: 20 & 21 are listed as new.bbc..., when they should be news.bbc...

Post-match: Has either team reached any finals or won any knockout style cups since?

I counted 12 duplicate links that'll need to be fixed.

All in all, I think it is a pretty solid effort and shouldn't take more than a few tweaks to get it to GA. I'll put this on hold in the meanwhile. Miyagawa (talk) 17:51, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the article Miyagawa, I believe I have seen to all the points you mentioned. Cal Umbra 10:27, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. There were still four duplicate links, but rather than delay the process I removed them myself. I believe this now meets the Good Article requirements. Miyagawa (talk) 14:13, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]