Talk:1st Brigade (Ireland)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Ireland (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Military history (Rated Stub-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality assessment scale.

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Shoulder Flash name[edit]

I noticed the old designation for the shoulder flashes were being used on both articles for the brigades even though the brigades no longer have geographical designations any more. So instead of '1st (Southern) Brigade you just have now '1st Brigade'. Similarly instead of '2nd (Eastern) Brigade' you now have just '2nd Brigade'. The shoulder flashes, while the same as the old brigades now identify with the new brigades. DojoIrl (talk) 20:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Facilites[edit]

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

The article lists the various civil/infrastructure facilities (airports/etc) that the Brigade is responsible for protecting. This is cited, and absolutely reasonable and appropriate to include. However, I don't see why we need to add a subjective/relative adjective like "important" to the statement. It doesn't add material/factual context for the reader, and it skirts WP:NPOV, WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV and WP:WTW for the project to be making value judgements on the readers behalf. (A reader will see four large transport infrastructure examples listed, and will make their own determination on importance.) In this vein, and ss per WTW, we should surely "let facts alone do the talking"(?) Guliolopez (talk) 15:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Resolved - By adding quotes around text (to cover WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV concern). Guliolopez (talk) 17:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)