Talk:2006 English football corruption investigation

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"No libel action was taken by any accused".

This is not actually true. Both Bond and Redknapp submitted libel cases against the BBC, but withdrew them before the trial date.

Could there be an argument that the libel proceedings were just for "show"?

"When questioned on the subject, the FA stated that their own investigation was still ongoing, and any charges will probably wait until the governments own investigation into football corruption has concluded."

What 'government' would that be?

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/NewsFromTheFA/Postings/2006/09/FAStatement.htm
- In 2006 English football corruption investigation on 2011-05-26 01:59:55, 404 Not Found
- In 2006 English football corruption investigation on 2011-06-13 17:15:32, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The lead-in I think sufficiently covers the article and needs not be modified any more.DaltonCastle (talk) 04:43, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 English football corruption investigation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071031193801/http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com:80/sport.cfm?id=980622007 to http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/sport.cfm?id=980622007

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]