Jump to content

Talk:2007 National People's Congress

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reads Like a Press Release

[edit]

This is little more than an official statement. I placed a POV tag on this page. Let's learn something useful. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Scott Adler (talk • contribs).

If you believe there is some sort of factual bias, please feel free to point it out. Claiming something sounds like a "press release" or an "official statement" doesn't seem to make any proper claim at a biased POV. 222.159.65.35 11:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

?

[edit]

Lighten up? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.177.45.200 (talk) 08:35, 16 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Party down 24.89.245.62 19:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan (disputable)

[edit]

Can we explain what this means instead of putting this cryptic parenthetical? I'm assuming that some Communist organization from Taiwan, or representing exiles from Taiwan, has sent representatives to the NPC without the consent of the ROC government on Taiwan ... but this should be spelled out. --Jfruh (talk) 14:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put in some more detail.

Roadrunner 15:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't some of this stuff be in the National People's Congress article itself? Colipon+(T) 23:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes probably. If you want to move it there, be my guest.

Roadrunner 00:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed

[edit]

Removed since this is incorrect....

making the legal provisions the first of its kind to protect private ownership in a country once dominated by ideological social egalitarianism.[1]

First of all, the law covers all forms of property in the PRC and is not specifically a private property bill. Second the protections on private property ownership are in the PRC Constitution, and there a number of administrative regulations and laws that protect private property in the PRC.

Roadrunner 15:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Guardian Unlimited: China Introduces Landmark Property Law

Removed this

[edit]
The bill is also aimed at curbing illegal land seizures in rural areas without proper compensation to farmers.[1]

This is disputable as the law doesn't change the system of land tenure in rural areas. There are some administrative measures that the State Council has adopted that will probably make a difference, but that is separate from the property law.

Roadrunner 23:59, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes you are absolutely right. I think... perhaps... "the bill is said to be also aimed at" is better? Colipon+(T) 07:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ BBC:China announces new property law

Changed Taiwan reference

[edit]

Wen has been harsh against Chen's administration, but there wasn't an increase in the harshness. I have some analysis of Wen's Taiwan comments, but most of that would probably be original research.

Roadrunner 22:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2007_National_People%27s_Congress&oldid=1196502436"