Talk:200 euro note

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article 200 euro note has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
December 7, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
August 23, 2012 Good article reassessment Kept
Current status: Good article
WikiProject Numismatics (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject European Union (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:200 euro note/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vibhijain (talk · contribs) 14:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well written:
1a. the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct.
  1. Section 4 needs a copy edit.  Done
  2. The whole "Enviromental impact" section is a copyvio of ref.no.14. Please fix it ASAP.  Done
1b. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  1. "two hundred euro note (€200)" should be changed to "two hundred euro note (€200)".  Done
  2. I have done some changes as per WP:DASH, hope that is fine. YesYThat is fine.
  3. Why the legal information is under the "History" section?  Done
  4. Put "Tracking" under "Enviromental impact".  Done
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
  1. Ref no. 9 and 10 are same. Done And 'CTUOO1' means 'Can't think up of one 1'.
2b. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines.
  1. "There has so far only been one ...... similar to the current one is to be issued from 2011.", the reference provided do not support this statement.  Done
  2. "The initial issue of notes bears the signature of ...... Jean-Claude Trichet, whose signature appears on subsequent issues.", this statement is also not supported by the reference given.  Done
2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
  1. The environmental impact of the note has to be added; you can use this as an example.  Done
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

#"Environmental impact" section do not have a NPOV. Please fix that. Examples are:

  1. As an environment-friendly institution
  2. tries very hard to make a ... save people's health

Euro notes are safe to use  Done, I think...

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:
6a. images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
  1. There are some more pictures here which are suitable for the article.  Done
    Just to comment on that for future reference. Pictures are NOT a GA requirement, but if you give me some, then sheesh, why not?
7. Overall assessment. I will wait for 7 days for the above issues to be solved. Thanks. :) Passed. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 15:18, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

GA Reassessment[edit]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:200 euro note/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "The changeover period during which the former currencies' notes and coins were exchanged for those of the euro lasted about two months, until 28 February 2002." should include the start date which was 1 January 2002  Done
    "Their aim is to record is to ascertain details about its spread and to generate statistics and rankings for various notes." needs to be reworked.  Done
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Reference #9 is a dead link. Has been dead since 2012-07-01.  Done
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comment[edit]

 DonePlarem (User talk) 12:36, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 200 euro note. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 200 euro note. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)