Jump to content

Talk:2012 CFL draft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is it appropriate to have sections for each round?

[edit]

I notice that this article has implemented the templates created for the NFL draft series. I'm fine with this, but I question whether it's appropriate to maintain a new article section for each round. One of the primary reasons these templates were created for the NFL draft articles was to allow sorting of the entire draft (e.g. by pro team, college team, position, player name, etc.), so the NFL draft implementations have eschewed the separate tables for each round. The removal of the separate tables is one of the reasons for the color coding of each round (to give an easy visual clue of where each round beings/ends). Just a suggestion. — DeeJayK (talk) 18:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2012 CFL Draft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:CFL Draft which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]