Talk:2012 St. Louis Cardinals season

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject St. Louis Cardinals.

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

St. Louis Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject St. Louis (Sports), a project to build and improve articles related to St. Louis and the surrounding metropolitan area. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.St. LouisWikipedia:WikiProject St. LouisTemplate:WikiProject St. LouisSt. Louis articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reorganized. Can this become a standard going forward?

I did some reorganization of Cardinals' 2012 season page. Some redundancies and/or topical misplacements caught my eye:

"Standings:" Records versus opponents and against each division are better fit under the standings topic to give an idea of how each team fared against each other relates to the table of the final standings. All those numbers focus on team's performance in the league-wide context.

"Players and coaching staff:" Why have a different topics for "players" and "roster?" I consolidated them. The former "players" topic only leads the reader to another page, anyway: "See also Cardinals all-time roster". Player statistics should directly follow the roster. The opening day lineup was its own section - Why? It belongs near the roster.

"Schedule and results:" I transferred the "game logs" section from "standings" to a separate topic now headed under "Schedule and results," since the schedule becomes the game scoring log as each game is played. Also, team performance in various situations goes here - a table of team performance outlines results that correspond to an in-game context.

I would like to see at least the most recent ones refitted with better organization, and see these changes to become a standard going forward, as some of these pages are a ghastly amalgam of information with no sensible alignment. Overall, the content on the 2012 page is satisfactory and is a good reference. ˜˜˜˜Elcid.ruderico 24 March 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elcid.ruderico (talk • contribs) 23:58, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]