Talk:September 2012 cacerolazo in Argentina

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Talk:2012 cacerolazo in Argentina)
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Argentina (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve September 2012 cacerolazo in Argentina, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Split[edit]

I propose to set apart the articles on the 8N and the September protest. They are different ones. Cambalachero (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

I agree --190.105.63.205 (talk) 18:32, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
If there are no opposes to the article split, I will arrange the change by tomorrow Cambalachero (talk) 00:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

"According to local newspaper's Clarín y la Nación.." OR "Nearly.."[edit]

We should be discussing this instead of engaging in WP:Edit war.--Neo139 (talk) 20:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

See the reference 20, a source that is not even from Argentina, and let me cite: "Now the use of law is seen as a further act of intimidation to keep media in line, even if, according to different international reports, 80% of audiovisual Argentine media are directly or indirectly controlled by the government". Cambalachero (talk) 21:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Also "It is estimated the the Kirchner government now has direct or indirect control of 80% of the Argentine media." (from The Guardian). It's hardly to get more reliable than The Guardian. Maybe we should change the word "Nearly" for "It's estimated that" or "Around". "Nearly" implies that 'is just a bit less', and the source indicates the the number is 'around 80%', so it could be 80, less or more. --Neo139 (talk) 22:03, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
I have found this one, from Global Editors Network. It says "Now the use of law is seen as a further act of intimidation to keep media in line, even if – according to different international reports – 80 percent of audiovisual Argentinian media are directly or indirectly controlled by the government.". It would be interesting if the find which international reports is the article referring to.--Neo139 (talk) 23:06, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

The "80% pro-gov media" statement is blatantly FALSE[edit]