Talk:2021 Kelana Jaya LRT collision
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of 2021 Kelana Jaya LRT collision be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Kuala Lumpur may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Section in Investigation had wrong information
[edit]Currently, the section wrote
- Preliminary investigations revealed that a train had stalled at a station while under automatic operation. In an attempt to get the train running again, the operator allegedly assumed manual control but instead of continuing southbound, reversed into the empty train behind it which had been returning to the depot
and cited this article https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/six-critical-in-the-aftermath-of-malaysias-rail-crash-as-human-error-identified-as
but the article stated the opposite, where the stalled train is empty, assumed manual control and reversed into the train with passengers, see the third and fourth paragraph of the cited article
--MNH48 (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Accidents vs Collision
[edit]The reason the word "collision" is more accurately to be used is because there were accidents on the Kelana Jaya LRT line, but this is the first collision to occur on the line. Hence the distinction. See this article for list of accidents on the LRT systems: https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/first-time-lrt-accident-results-serious-injuries-passengers
The reason that the media uses the word "accident" is because it refers to the event as a whole, but the word "collision" is more accurate term to be used to describe this event in terms of counting this event as the first-ever collision-based accident. MetroMapFinalRender.svg (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- I guess we should amend the wordings. By the way, how should we fill up the chronology of the accident? TheGreatSG'rean (talk) 11:34, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Train unit 40 as Bombardier Innovia ART II?
[edit]As I looked through every news site cited in the article, I could not find a single image which shows train unit 40 as a Innovia ART II, as most media on social media and news sites perpetuate from the revenue-service unit 81. If anyone can find source or image that train unit 40 as Bombardier Innovia ART II, I suggest to hold off adding it to the article, as this is against WP:ORIGINAL and has people already citing the wikipedia to look as to which train models were affected when in actuality, we do not have any means to verify that. MetroMapFinalRender.svg (talk) 09:57, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- C-Class Malaysia articles
- Low-importance Malaysia articles
- WikiProject Malaysia articles
- C-Class rail transport articles
- Low-importance rail transport articles
- C-Class Rapid transit articles
- Unknown-importance Rapid transit articles
- WikiProject Rapid transit articles
- Operations task force articles
- Passenger trains task force articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- C-Class Transport articles
- Low-importance Transport articles
- WikiProject Transport articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Kuala Lumpur