This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at 2023 France–China Summit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 11:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One of the issues you mentioned is an interesting one in Europe, namely why there is a relatively large difference between France and the EU in the topic of China. This is especially true in a China-France thread, should we as editors deliberately emphasize von der Leyen (rather than the opinions of China's Xi Jinping or France's Macron). Of course I think that if the main venue of a talk is in France, then more local government and media literature in France should be read; if it is in China, then Chinese analysis should not be excluded from Wikipedia. A cooperative and powerful China and France will inevitably move the US or UK's cake. If I were the US or UK government, I would also use media reports to deliberately discredit the cooperation (and if I could prevent it, so much the better).
But the reality is that the smear didn't live up to the "expectation", Xi Jinping still went to France, Macron still entertained him, and the agreement was signed. The fact that Wikipedia has to go on and on about irrelevant details of Von der Leyen's remarks is, I think, not only an insult to China and France, but also an insult to Wikipedia. Of course this is wishful thinking on my part; after all, the Wikipedia servers are in the US. Our discussion itself is a travesty. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 14:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course I still respect Von der Leyen, and I'm probably one of the few in China who think Von der Leyen looked at European interests more than American or Chinese interests. She criticized China's dumping on the EU in front of Xi Jinping, which I thought was quite courageous and bold. That's why I found her photo on the EU website, but if I were to put her words on the corresponding page, I'd probably be told that I'm "describing too many details that no one cares about". TinaLees-Jones (talk) 14:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at 2023 France–China Summit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 11:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)