Talk:2MAX

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2MAX article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal 2MAX is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Radio Stations Low‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Investigation

The station seems to be struggling with the investigation by the ACMA, basically they do not understand participation in the media includes decision making. The station has failed to implement anything regarding policy and procedures for allowing programming to be handled by anyone other than neo-conservative, narrow minded, pseudo Christian small country town dictators.

Surprise surprise the ACMA takes a dim view of that. No Youth on committees, no gay and lesbian programming allowed, no "heavy music" allowed, because sponsors wouldn't stand for it. That is NOT going to go down well with the ACMA.

******** Obviously, you haven't recieved the good news then!!

Defining good news as being that the ACMA issued a no-breach finding? I think that the station had a lot of work to do to show that participation in decision making is actually happening. Looking forward to seeing the outcome at the AGM... Are you going to publish the findings of the ACMA report?150.101.201.72 (talk) 06:10, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]